Parents self-paid millions to build a footbridge, want to earn advertising money was criticized for impure purposes, donations should be gratuitous?

In early June 2020, Ms. Meng made it clear that she wanted to pay millions out of pocket to donate a footbridge in front of the school, the local housing construction, urban management and other units to give their full support, and the quality of construction work and safety construction carried out supervision. Later the donor explicitly proposed to want to footbridge 30 years of advertising and publicity contracting rights, did not get the relevant departments are willing to. According to the relevant laws and regulations, after the completion of the footbridge, it will be transferred to the relevant departments management methods. Some netizens do not agree with Ms. Meng to do that, think they are like her to engage in the words, after the bad advertising campaigns will be overflowing streets, Ms. Meng if you want to make a profit, you should go to the project investment.

Ms. Meng kind donation of personal behavior is very worthy of attention praise, after all, she found the problem, and has long been out of real money to solve the problem, but the relevant departments of the practice is also very worthy of doubt. Overpass belongs to the municipal engineering public **** facilities, overhaul, maintenance responsibility by the relevant departments to bear, Ms. Meng asked for advertising and publicity contracting rights, this kind of thing who should do it?

Charity is not a public good should be attached to the conditions, Ms. Meng donated the building after the building, can get the naming rights of the building, found that the relevant departments will be used in other ways, the building can be supervised by the duty to provide the other party to correct, but this does not mean that she can be unscrupulous. For example, "Yat-Fu Building" "Yat-Fu Middle School" "Yat-Fu Elementary School" this kind of more or less everyone has heard of seen, this kind of housing buildings, institutions are by philanthropist Mr. Run Run Shaw old The company's name is "Shaw" and the name is "Shaw".

After he donated the institution, the institution belonged to the relevant departments, and he did not have much to do with it, not to the institution's daily operations, classroom teaching, and not to require the institution only and a special canteen contracting company collaboration, otherwise then it is not called public welfare, called project investment. Everyone's standard of living is good, the social and moral standard is also slowly improving, more and more people take the trouble to their own a force to assist others, do more people do charity, but and charity donations related to disputes, but also more up.

A hospital is located in rural Jiangsu, the diagnosis and treatment standard is relatively outdated, was elected to the precise poverty alleviation project project, was donated more than 3 million yuan of medical equipment, the hospital level to donate machines and equipment to the enterprise payment of nearly 600,000 yuan of installation, adjustment, warranty spending. But after a period of time, the hospital found that the quality of many machines and equipment simply does not meet the relevant norms, but also feel that the use of donated objects is far from three million, the donor sued the people's court, the provisions of the return of more than 290,000 yuan of installation costs.

The defendant's defense attorney felt that it is a donation and not a transaction, the defendant has long been presented with the corresponding installation, adjustment of service projects, no profit from this, so do not need to return more than 29 million yuan. But the presiding judge does not feel that way, she showed that donation is actually a civil law act, whether the donor or the donor, should follow the relevant laws and regulations, can not ignore the public interest of personal behavior of the legal and regulatory characteristics of the purpose of participating in charitable activities, the purpose of the must be simplicity. In the presidency of the negotiation, the donor returned part of the expenses.

The original intention of the public welfare charitable donations is the strongest to assist the weak, the development of a large group of people together to change the status quo level. But some people take the public charity as a business , the company deposited unsold machinery and equipment, clothes and pants, the expiration of the snacks donated, for which won a good reputation. That kind of personal behavior is likely to violate the law, in accordance with the relevant requirements of the "Charity Law", the donation of objects, quality must also pass.

In the visceral organ donation industry, disputes are especially common. Some patients, despite their wealth, are terminally ill and have no way of surviving, and some of them have found a "business opportunity" in which they are looking for human organs that can be matched in the name of paid donation. That involves the crime of selling internal organs, in accordance with the relevant requirements of the Human Organ Transplantation Regulations, the donation of human organs, must be created in the "free, consent" basically, no matter what the name, as long as the money given, the characteristics of the matter will change.

Network mutual aid, fund-raising in recent years has become more and more common, giving a part of the people to seek help in the way, so that the poor people see the expectation, but thus causing disputes, disputes, many cases. The relevant departments must sound these aspects of the laws and regulations, so that everyone in the legal framework of the laws and regulations to make good deeds, to prevent dispute cases, the social trend will become better and better.