Advantages and shortcomings of the medical consortium

Primary health care services have received more attention, the number of consultations and bed utilization rate of primary health care institutions have increased, and the satisfaction of the public has been improving, which promotes the division of labor and cooperation among medical institutions and promotes the establishment of a reasonable diagnosis and treatment order. For those "medical consortiums" that have not yet achieved integration, the fact that different medical institutions belong to different departments, coupled with divergent interests, can easily lead to the fragmentation of medical institutions within the consortium, making unified management more difficult. The advantages of the development of the "medical association".

The study found that the development of "medical consortium" has brought more attention to the work of primary health services, increased the number of consultations and bed utilization rate of primary health institutions, and the public's satisfaction has also been improved, which promotes the division of labor and cooperation among medical institutions and promotes the establishment of a reasonable diagnosis and treatment order. The establishment of a rational diagnosis and treatment order.

The mobility of medical personnel and the cultivation of talents within the consortium have also been continuously optimized, and the level of medical services of the member units, especially the primary units, has been greatly improved.

At the same time, the "medical consortium" has also made the allocation and utilization of healthcare resources more reasonable, and the core hospitals within the consortium have carried out unified management of resources, which has lowered the management costs of the primary healthcare institutions and improved the operational efficiency of the primary healthcare institutions. The development of centralized delivery also makes up for the lack of resources at the grassroots level.