First of all, we have to understand what preexisting condition is? It is an extra conductive fiber in the heart, which is reflected in the electrocardiogram as a superimposed weak cardiac signal. It's like when a person has an extra mole; some moles develop into malignant tumors, others don't.
According to medical expertise, there are three kinds of preexisting conditions: ① preexisting asymptomatic, which doesn't affect study and work at all, and doesn't require treatment. ②pre-excitation with symptoms, this situation is a frequent attack, characterized by a rapid heartbeat. ③ Pre-excitation has complications. The heart carries other complications. Against the Physical Examination Criteria, for preexcited asymptomatic persons, it is clearly in line with Article 1, but the operation manual restricts it. This is its contradiction and its injustice. What is the problem? The key to the problem is the conceptual distinction between preexcitation and preexcitation syndrome. 1) It is not strictly a preexcitation syndrome, but a simple preexcitation phenomenon, which does not conform to the definition of "syndrome", that is, "Syndrome, a medical term, refers to a group of typical signs or symptoms of animal and plant diseases, dysfunctions, pathologies presenting as foci or injuries. Signs or symptoms." The definition of "syndrome" is "a medical term for a group of typical signs or symptoms of an animal or plant disease, dysfunction, pathology, lesion or injury", which is not a group, but a superimposed ECG signal without symptoms. ② ③ is the real pre-excitation syndrome, otherwise it is self-contradiction and great injustice.
Some may question: this symptom may strike later? Ask the pre-excitation without disorder people live for more than twenty years with no problem, how much can it affect in the future? This questioning is purely unfounded. According to this possibility, then a small group of experts may be electrocuted and killed by electricity, but also in a crowded city car accident and killed, and may drink water accidentally choked to death, and even more likely to exercise and sudden death of respiratory failure, this possibility does not stand up to scrutiny at all.
The following is an analysis of radiofrequency ablation for preexcitation through medical expertise to determine whether preexcitation is serious or not. During the electrophysiologic examination and calibration of the procedure, preexcitation syndrome is induced by repeated stimulation within the heart through a catheter that enters the heart from a blood vessel. If it's dangerous, the patient will likely die, which contradicts the statistic that the surgery has a success rate of over 95%. If it were serious, would there still be so many pre-excitators posting on the internet? If it were serious, would these pre-exciters have died young? As you can see, pre-excitation is not serious at all, even after an attack.
Why is there a medical restriction? This has to be analyzed in terms of what can be achieved by limiting pre-excitation in a standard manual. Medical equipment is expensive, and limiting preexcitation syndromes when setting standards for medical examinations allows hospitals to recoup their costs by obtaining high surgical fees. Additionally, medical care is very demanding in terms of clinical trials, and limiting the preexcitation syndrome could force many preexcited people to become experimental samples for doctors, thus overall improving cardiac surgery in hospitals across the country. This surgery has a 95 percent success rate, and the rewards that medical tests get for limiting it are enormous.
No one is immune to mistakes, not even political parties, scientists, or the most powerful brain, Albert Einstein, and in this case, aren't hospital doctors to blame? In the implementation of unreasonable system, it is difficult to blame. Hospital doctors, in good conscience to draw conclusions, hurt God, heaven and earth!!!!
"Gaining much help, losing little help", when more and more people found that hospitals in this issue are not their own integrity, and jumped to conclusions with a clear conscience, the doctor's benevolence is gone. When the mask of unkindness and injustice is demolished, people who know the truth will not go to donate blood, not to mention grateful to the hospital and doctors. The so-called "justice lies in the hearts of the people", the truth of the issue, is to let more people see, let the people of the country to judge.