The importance of strengthening the use and management of army material procurement evaluation experts
It is the need to accelerate the reform of the army material procurement work. Actively deepen the army material procurement reform is a new period to do a good job in the military struggle for logistics preparation, improve the logistics of comprehensive protection capacity of the important content, must be placed on the agenda of the material procurement work, and to strengthen the use of material procurement evaluation experts and management is the current army material procurement reform of the important content. The evaluation opinions of the military procurement evaluation experts play a pivotal role in the final results of the military procurement activities. At the same time, strengthening the management of procurement evaluation experts is the need to adapt to the adjustment and reform of the military establishment system. With the adjustment and reform of the army establishment system, the professional and technical talents of the army material procurement department have been reduced, which makes the lack of professional evaluation talents and experience in the material procurement evaluation. Therefore, it is very important to strengthen the use and management of the evaluation experts of the army material procurement. In the army material procurement activities, evaluation experts in the material procurement department for the selection of high quality and low price, excellent service on the role of the referee on the military materials. To a certain extent, the quality of their work directly affects the quality and reputation of military procurement. Therefore, strengthening the use and management of military procurement evaluation experts is the need to speed up the reform of military procurement. The evaluation of army material procurement is the key link of army material procurement activities. Army material procurement activities due to the different procurement methods, its procedural requirements may vary, but whether it is open bidding, invitations to tender, competitive negotiation, or request for quotations, can not be separated from the evaluation of material procurement experts. No evaluation experts objective and fair, true and reliable evaluation opinions, the procurement agency will not be able to purchase cheap, good quality, excellent service military supplies, suppliers can not realize their value on the stage of fair competition, the chain of procurement activities will be broken. Therefore, the evaluation activities of the procurement evaluation experts are directly related to the military material procurement activities are smooth and effective, is a key part of the military material procurement activities.
Strengthening the use and management of procurement evaluation experts is a guarantee of openness, fairness and impartiality in the evaluation of material procurement. "Openness, fairness and impartiality" is the principle of the army material procurement, but also the cornerstone of the army material procurement. The principle of "openness, fairness and impartiality" is manifested through the evaluation of military procurement materials. By strengthening the management of army material procurement evaluation experts, make them in the procurement evaluation activities, in accordance with the agreement of the prior bidding documents and the pre-determined evaluation methods and standards for evaluation activities, fair treatment of suppliers, suppliers of materials, works and services for objective and fair evaluation, put forward the evaluation opinion, recommend the winning supplier. Therefore, strengthening the management of the use of evaluation experts in military material procurement can ensure the openness, fairness and impartiality of material procurement evaluation. No evaluation experts scientific evaluation activities, open, fair and impartial cornerstone is difficult to exist, material procurement results can not be realized, their evaluation opinions directly affect the final results of the army material procurement.
Strengthening the use of material procurement evaluation experts and management of a few suggestions Unify the conditions, the establishment of a scientific evaluation of the expert pool. Strengthen the use and management of material procurement evaluation experts, first of all, according to the "army material procurement evaluation expert management regulations" unified conditions, the required experts should rely on the army internal and social talent groups, the establishment of scientific material procurement evaluation expert database. According to the Regulations on the Management of Experts in the Evaluation of Military Material Procurement, experts in the evaluation of material procurement should have the following conditions:
(1) Familiar with the policies and regulations of the state and the military material procurement;
(2) Good business quality, eight years of work in the relevant fields, with a Bachelor's degree or higher, senior professional and technical positions, or the same level of professional and technical level (not in line with the regulations, but in the relevant fields of professional expertise). Provisions, but in the relevant field of professional expertise must be outstanding, familiar with market conditions);
(3) have good professional ethics, in the evaluation of procurement of materials can be objective and fair, integrity and self-discipline, and compliance with the law;
(4) I voluntarily participate in the evaluation of the army's procurement of materials in an independent capacity, and to accept the supervision and management of the department of the military supplies and oil;
(5) no violation of laws and malpractices, and the supervision and management of the military supplies and oil;
(6) have no violation of the law, and no violation of the law. (5) There is no violation of law and discipline and bad record.
For the above material procurement evaluation experts meet the prescribed conditions of the personnel, only to the army material procurement agencies or military supplies and oil sector self-recommendation, but also by the unit and the relevant experts recommended. In this way, through the unification of the conditions, the establishment of material procurement evaluation expert pool, not only to make full use of social talent resources, but also to facilitate the strengthening of the material procurement evaluation of the unified management and use of experts.
Sound system, standardize the evaluation of expert evaluation behavior. In order to regulate the evaluation of expert evaluation behavior, can be set up by the General Logistics Department of military supplies and oil sector by the main leader as the head of the relevant business departments to participate in the evaluation of expert management of the procurement of materials leading group, the unified procurement of materials evaluation of the management of experts. As the military materiel procurement evaluation experts play an important role as referees in the process of whether social resources can be scientifically transformed into logistical support power and enhance the combat power of the troops. Therefore, it is necessary to base on the overall framework of logistics integration construction, in accordance with the basic requirements and principles of integration construction, to take the material procurement evaluation experts as an integrated element of logistics support integration, overall planning, and systematic development. It also focuses on improving the system and regulations of material procurement evaluation experts, establishing and improving the system of military material procurement evaluation experts, and providing organizational guarantees for military material procurement reform in the evaluation process. At the same time, through the establishment of a sound material procurement evaluation expert system, can optimize the configuration of the army material procurement evaluation expert resources, reduce the government out of multiple departments, information communication difficult, relationship coordination difficult and other aspects of the problem, so as to effectively regulate the evaluation of the evaluation expert evaluation behavior.
Separation of management and utilization, and improve the evaluation quality of evaluation experts. First, the evaluation of the use of experts and management to adhere to the separation of management. Separation of management, that is, the management of the army material procurement evaluation experts and the use of the army material procurement evaluation experts separately. That is, the Ministry of Quartermaster supplies and oil is responsible for the army material procurement evaluation expert management, material procurement evaluation expert use by the material procurement agency from the expert database organization randomly selected. Adhere to the separation of management and use, is the evaluation of open and transparent guarantee, is to make the material procurement activities open project, open procedures, open offer, open results, to prevent the management and use of a "behind-the-scenes transactions" and "backroom operation". Adhere to the separation of management and use, but also to ensure that the material procurement evaluation experts from a professional point of view, independent and independent to complete the various types of material procurement evaluation activities, to promote the procurement evaluation work can be smooth and efficient, and effectively improve the quality of evaluation experts evaluation.
Strictly in accordance with the requirements of the "military material procurement evaluation expert management regulations" to use evaluation experts. According to the regulations, no unit or individual may designate a material procurement evaluation expert or intervene in the selection of evaluation experts. In bidding and procurement, experts who participate in the preparation of bidding documents or provide advice on bidding projects may no longer participate in bid evaluation activities as evaluation experts. Personnel of a business department shall not participate as experts in bid evaluation activities for material procurement projects of their own department or unit. At the same time, in order to prevent the loss of confidentiality due to the length of time, the selection of evaluation experts for material procurement shall be carried out one day before the bid opening or bid evaluation in non-tendering mode, and shall not exceed two days under special circumstances. To resolutely change the past by the procurement agency to select experts, and then reported to the business sector for approval of the practice, because this practice is a long period of time, prone to loss of confidentiality, will prompt individual personnel to interfere in the evaluation of the evaluation of experts.
In the management, to strengthen the education and training of evaluation experts. As the army material procurement evaluation experts, not only must be proficient in material, engineering, services and other aspects of professional knowledge, but also must be familiar with the army procurement policies and regulations and bidding and tendering knowledge. Needless to say, each expert, in the field of expertise engaged in a considerable wealth of professional knowledge, but due to the army material procurement work for a short period of time, only a few years from the military commission [16th] document to start the organization of procurement is still in development, no experience can be drawn on; and need to purchase a wide range of materials, involving a wide range of surfaces. Therefore, to strengthen the army material procurement knowledge learning and training is not only the procurement regulations on the evaluation of the expert requirements, but also the evaluation of their own experts to improve the quality and efficiency of the evaluation work, to meet the continuous standardization and development of the army procurement business needs. Really learn and implement the army material procurement related regulations and systems and business knowledge, is the evaluation of experts in accordance with the management of the army material procurement evaluation experts need to do a good job in the army material procurement evaluation work.
Dynamic management, the regular implementation of performance evaluation of evaluation experts.
To implement dynamic management of procurement evaluation experts, in order to standardize the evaluation behavior of experts and improve the overall quality of the evaluation expert team. Regularly review the qualifications of the evaluation experts in the procurement evaluation expert pool, and update the relevant information of the material procurement evaluation expert pool. The business level, working ability and professional ethics of the evaluation experts in the actual procurement evaluation work of the army material procurement shall be tracked and recorded, and reflected in the expert database. For the evaluation experts who strictly abide by the regulations and systems of army material procurement and seriously and responsibly make evaluation opinions during the evaluation process, they are to be recorded in the evaluation expert database, and can be exempted from examination in the regular qualification examination and performance management assessment. For evaluation experts who do not strictly follow the prescribed scoring methods as well as the operating procedures stipulated by law in the bid evaluation process, the bad behavior record system is implemented, which is recorded in the list of bad records and canceled its qualification to participate in the procurement evaluation next time, and if the situation is serious, its qualification as a procurement evaluation expert is canceled and it will be famous from the evaluation expert database. This is both effective measures to regulate the evaluation behavior of experts, but also the implementation of dynamic management of the basic requirements of the evaluation experts.
Regular implementation of performance appraisal of evaluation experts. American Harvard University professor William. James did an experiment, he found through research, a person if not incentivized, only to play its ability to 20% to 30%, if by the correct and adequate incentives, will be able to play its ability to 80% to 90%, or even higher.
For the army material procurement evaluation expert management, the establishment of a complete set of incentives and constraints mechanism, the implementation of performance appraisal management, will help to improve the overall performance of the army material procurement evaluation experts, and thus improve the economic efficiency of the army material procurement. To establish a set of perfect army procurement performance evaluation system, the use of appropriate evaluation methods, qualitative and quantitative evaluation of all aspects of procurement evaluation work. The evaluation of evaluation experts should highlight the following points: first, the evaluation of military procurement evaluation experts focus on the use of military expenditure efficiency analysis to regulate the behavior; second, the evaluation of whether from the corresponding rules and regulations, procurement directory, procurement plans and the actual needs of the troops to carry out a comprehensive evaluation; third, the evaluation of the implementation of the procurement services whether the cost control and cost-effectiveness analysis. The fourth is to assess whether the implementation of the relevant economic laws and regulations and the army material procurement and bidding and other relevant provisions.
Rewards and penalties are clearly defined, to play the positive initiative of evaluation experts. To make the army material procurement evaluation activities throughout the open, fair and impartial principle, the army material procurement evaluation experts must be scientific, objective and impartial attitude to participate in material procurement evaluation work. In order to ensure that the army material procurement evaluation experts to scientific, objective, impartial attitude to participate in material procurement evaluation, must take measures to evaluate the experts to reward and punish, mobilize the evaluation of the experts of the positive initiative.
For the evaluation activities in the evaluation of scientific and fair attitude to participate in the army material procurement evaluation activities of experts should be given the corresponding reward. For strictly abide by the army material procurement regulations and systems, abide by the objective and impartial code of ethics, conscientiously perform their duties, in the evaluation process without any interference, independent, responsible for the evaluation opinions, evaluation of experienced and professional skilled evaluation experts, to give recognition and rewards, and in the evaluation of the expert database record in the regular qualification review and performance management assessment can enjoy exemption treatment.
To seriously deal with the evaluation activities can not be scientific and fair attitude to participate in the evaluation of military material procurement activities of experts. In the bid evaluation process is not strictly in accordance with the provisions of the scoring method and the operating procedures prescribed by law, arbitrary modifications and variations of the evaluation of the behavior of experts, the implementation of bad behavior record system, and cancel its next participation in the procurement evaluation of the qualifications. Through malicious collusion to promote suppliers to win the bid, the winning results are invalid, and in accordance with the Government Procurement Law and the military materiel procurement evaluation expert management regulations for serious treatment, the circumstances are serious, the qualification of its procurement evaluation experts canceled, constitutes a crime according to the law to pursue criminal responsibility, and seriously deal with violations of laws and regulations in the evaluation process. So that the evaluation experts can consciously implement the state and the army material procurement laws and regulations, and actively cooperate with the army material procurement agencies to do a good job in accordance with the law procurement evaluation, to take practical action to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the suppliers, and safeguard the impartiality of the material procurement evaluation process, in the process of procurement evaluation, we must adhere to the principle of exclusion of behavior that may affect the impartiality of the procurement, and really make the winning suppliers happy, not winning the suppliers comfortable.