Moon landing scam, evidence, the biggest scientific scam of the 2th century.

The landing on the moon in the United States was the biggest political scam in the 2th century

Zhou Qun commented: Many years ago, I said: "As long as it is a democratic country where people are masters of their own affairs, the government must do its best to eliminate the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rates that the people want the most, and do its best to improve the social environment of medical care, education, employment, housing, old-age care and peace that the people need most! Then, does such a government that serves the people wholeheartedly still need to live by deceiving the people? ! In a country where the bourgeoisie is the master of animals, the government must maliciously support the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rates that the people least want, and deliberately ignore the medical care, education, employment, housing, old-age care and peaceful social environment that the people most need! Then, can such a government that serves the bourgeoisie wholeheartedly live without deceiving the people? !”

Therefore, it is normal for a rubbish capitalist country like the United States to cheat the world to get by. The so-called "Apollo" landing on the moon in 1969 also treated all the people in the world as idiots, and created another political scam with its usual despicable means. The purpose was nothing more than to fool all the human beings in the world: capitalist countries could land on the moon first despite maliciously supporting the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rates that the people least wanted!

The original reprint: "American Landing on the Moon, the biggest scientific scam in the 2th century"

Night Rain on Mount Tai has been ugly for years.

Tomorrow (July 21st) is the 4th anniversary of the so-called "successful landing on the moon" in the United States. However, with the development of science and technology, more and more people think that this is a big scam in the United States! Even today, more and more Americans are suspecting that this is a scam. According to British media reports on February 15th this year, as NASA is about to celebrate the 4th anniversary of Apollo 11 manned landing on the moon this summer, conspiracy theories about Apollo 11 manned landing on the moon are becoming more and more rampant. It is reported that the proportion of Americans who believe that the Apollo 11 landing on the moon was a complete lie has soared from 6% in 1979 to more than 22% now. In addition, more than 4% people are dubious, that is to say, only one-third of the American population is convinced that the US moon landing is successful, and most people think it is a scam! The most shocking thing is that even a former engineer and a former NASA astronaut who participated in the design of the Apollo spacecraft rocket believe that Americans have not landed on the moon. Many people think this is the biggest scientific scam in the 2th century! Of course, people's doubts mainly focus on some details, such as the doubts about many unreasonable places exposed by photos and videos of the moon landing! And my question is not only in these details, but also in more important and critical issues to prove that this is a scam! The author's questions are mainly manifested in the following aspects:

1. The most important question is: How did the Apollo spacecraft leave the moon and fly back to Earth? It should be noted that the moon is also attractive. Flying back to the earth from the moon does not mean flying back if you want. He needs to get rid of the gravity of the moon and fly back towards the earth, which requires a strong thrust for the spacecraft to leave the moon and fly to the earth, which requires a launcher and a launch vehicle, just like launching a spacecraft on the earth requires a launcher and a rocket! It's good that Americans can land on the moon, but how can they come back so easily? At that time, the technology could not bring astronauts back to earth safely. Taking off on the moon required a lot of fuel and, of course, a launcher, and it could not solve the problem of cooling the launcher when taking off on earth. There are too many questions. The lander for landing on the moon needs a return rocket, and it is not a small thing, and it should have a launcher. However, the American lunar module can't see the return rocket, so it is not only impossible for the return module to return to space, but also it can't fly high, and there is no return rocket shot at all. Now the truth is clear, not only the launcher, but also not a hair. You know, until today, including our Chang 'e-1, Japan's lunar exploration satellites and other countries' lunar exploration satellites have gone and never returned, and finally hit the moon and stayed on the moon forever, because we can't recover the lunar exploration satellites to the earth at present, and it is difficult for the United States to reach this level at that time, but now the United States is not as good as before? Up to now, no scientist has given a full and powerful explanation about how the Apollo spacecraft flew back to Earth from the moon! Nowadays, many scientists just make some sophistry explanations on the details. Moreover, the biggest problem is how to land and lift off the spacecraft on the moon. Although the gravity on the moon is smaller than that on the earth, it is not small for spaceships in space. If it can land smoothly, it is not easy, but also ensure that it has enough fuel to take off again and get rid of the gravity of the moon. I wonder how the small moon landing cabin of the external image spider got rid of the gravity of the moon and landed safely without air and parachute!

2. After the lunar module returns to the lunar orbit, it must be docked with the on-orbit spacecraft, and the live broadcast shows that no one docked and returned to the mother ship. After the crew returned to the mother ship, the rocket that needed a large thrust was ignited again to leave the lunar orbit and return to the earth orbit, and there was no relevant image data. The return of the lunar module to the lunar orbit requires constant adjustment of the orbit and speed together with the mother ship. The return and launch of the lunar module is a random process in time, direction and speed, so docking will be very difficult and long, at least around the moon many times, but this process is not available in the live broadcast.

3. Only recently did the United States realize the docking of the space station to the earth orbit with the help of Russia. In the late 196s, it was impossible for the United States to carry out more difficult docking of the moon orbit without the docking of the earth orbit. Without the docking of the moon orbit, the moon landing personnel could not return. The earth orbit docking can only be realized under the precise monitoring and calculation of the ground monitoring network without dead angle. Obviously, the lunar orbit docking is much more difficult, and the current technology in the United States is not sure to realize it in a short time.

4. The United States flaunts itself as a country where human rights are supreme, and it has to go through many unmanned, animal and plant space experiments before it dares to put people into earth orbit. Therefore, before manned landing on the moon, there must be quite a number of unmanned, animal and plant experiments on the moon, otherwise the US government and NASA will be disregard for human life. However, there were no unmanned, animal and plant experiments on the moon in the United States, and two people were directly sent to the moon at one time. Isn't this irrational and ridiculous, disregard for human life?

5. About landing on the moon by live television in the United States. The United States conducted a live broadcast of the moon landing on color TV about 4 years ago. How fast does it take to broadcast live on the moon? Suppose it is the worst black-and-white TV effect, the resolution is 32×2, 1 pictures per second, and each pixel has 16 gray levels, so it needs a speed of 2,56,bps. At present, there is hope only if the technology is nearly 1 thousand times faster, which is simply impossible! Today's technology, whether it is antenna technology, communication technology (this time, in order to ensure the communication effect, very long baseline interferometry technology is used) or image technology, is simply unimaginable 4 years ago. It is impossible for China to achieve such science and technology at present, and I have never heard that any country in the world can do it, not to mention the countless technical conditions that were behind 4 years ago. It should be noted that until today, our Chang 'e-1 and the Japanese goddess of the moon have not been able to broadcast live on TV when they reach the lunar orbit. The United States did it 4 years ago, but today the United States can't do it. Isn't it puzzling? Is to make America land on the moon again today. He can't even do it. The United States claims that there are no drawings for launching rockets at that time. Is this possible?

6. All the moon landings were completed during President Nixon's term of office. Despite the rapid development of human science and technology in the past 4 years, no other American leader can complete the feat of landing on the moon during his term of office. Supposedly, with the rapid development of science and technology in the past 4 years, landing on the moon should be as easy as sending a satellite casually. However, until today, the American moon landing plan is an unreachable plan. Is the technology now not as good as it was forty years ago?

7. The "Goddess of the Moon" probe launched by Japan did not find any traces of Apollo's landing on the moon and human activities when shooting over the landing areas of Apollo 15 and Apollo 17. This also proves that the United States never landed on the moon.

8. The rocks brought back from the moon are exactly the same as those collected by scientists from Antarctica. This is also a fact that many scientists dare not deny although they want to sophistry.

9. Let's talk about this scam from the flaws that people can see through the moon landing photos and videos:

Evidence of the moon landing scam (1): There are no stars in the sky in the moon landing photos

Evidence of the moon landing scam (2): The lunar module didn't hit a hole on the moon surface when it landed.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (3): The strong gas generated when it landed will blow away nearby. Therefore, it is impossible to see the footprints of astronauts near the lunar module.

Evidence of lunar fraud (4): Since the sun is the only light source on the moon, the shadows of all objects in the moon landing photos should be parallel, but the shadows in many photos have different directions, indicating that there is more than one light source or the light source is very close to the subject.

Evidence of lunar fraud (5): Why do some photos have exactly the same background even though they were taken in different places? It's like using the same set version.

Evidence of lunar fraud (6): After the mission to the moon is completed, the ascent of the lunar module can't see the flame ejected by the rocket engine when it flies off the lunar surface, which proves that this is false, and the ascent is also a model hoisted by a steel cable.

Evidence of lunar fraud (7): As long as the so-called lunar film is played with a fast mirror, the actions of the astronauts and the lunar rover will be found. Prove that these films are false.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (8): There is no air on the moon. When the astronauts plant the national flag, they can see the flag flying in the wind, which proves that the films were shot by the earth.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (9): The glasses of the cameras used by the astronauts are engraved with several Crosshairs to facilitate the measurement of the photographed objects. Why are there some photos? But behind it, it proves that these so-called crosshairs were added afterwards, and these photos are also false. < P > Evidence of the moon landing scam (1) There is no reason for the United States to bring back that displayed flag. The United States should leave the flag on the moon as a souvenir, and it is also strong evidence that the United States took the lead in landing on the moon and occupying it. However, it is not consistent with the consistent habits of the United States to fail to do so.

1. Russian space research expert Alexander. Goldov pointed out: What is even more revealing is that seeing astronauts walking on the surface of the moon from the film documentary is like walking on the ground. In fact, the gravity on the moon is six times smaller than that on the earth, so every step taken by people on the moon is equivalent to a step of 5 to 6 meters long on the ground; When the lunar landing instrument moves on the surface of the moon, the small stones ejected from the wheels of the lunar landing instrument fall to the ground at the same speed as the earth, which should be six times faster on the moon than on the earth. Ralph, a famous American engineer. Rene, British scientist David. Perry and Mali. Bert agreed with his question. People represented by Hamlet, a famous American physics professor, affirmed the "deception theory"

11. People represented by Hamlet, a famous American physics professor, affirmed the "deception theory". The modern space shuttle can only put 2 tons of load into low orbit, but Saturn V can easily put more than 1 tons of load into earth orbit and push dozens of tons of objects out of the earth's gravity circle. Why did it be abandoned later? It is said that even the drawings have not been preserved? Moreover, the influence of temperature on photographic equipment can reach 121°C during the day. According to the picture, the camera is exposed outside the spacesuit without heat preservation measures. The film will curl and fail when heated at 66 C. How can I take a picture?

12. In addition, if the lunar landing cabin achieves a soft landing by rocket reaction, the floating soil around the lunar landing cabin will be blown away like a helicopter, so it is even more impossible to step on footprints! But in the so-called moon landing photos in the United States, we can't see the traces of floating soil blown away, but the so-called footprints stepped by astronauts! What a self-contradictory naked lie! On September 27th, 23, the European Space Agency successfully launched its first lunar probe-SMART-1, which is also the first lunar probe launched by human beings in the 21st century. It successfully entered the orbit around the moon on November 15, 24. The lunar probe of the European Space Agency flew for two months a year before entering the lunar orbit. It took only 1 days for the United States to go to the 38,-kilometer lunar belt and return to the moon. Is this possible?

Since the late 197s, former employees and journalists of NASA first exposed the moon landing scam, believing it was a lie. Since the United States filmed the moon landing in the studio and deceived the world. More and more scientists and people from all over the world think that landing on the moon is a scam. Known as the "father of the moon landing scam", BillKaysing and DavidPercy, a British photographer, wrote "We have never landed on the moon". BillKaysing has a lot of background. He used to be one of the "designers" of the lunar module manufacturer Rocketdyne, claiming to be familiar with the "details" of the "moon landing" scam. In order to strengthen the credibility of his works, he claimed to have invited a number of "anonymous" experts to help. Much to NASA's embarrassment, even Bill Cassin, a former engineer who once participated in the design of the Apollo spacecraft rocket, and a former NASA astronaut believe that Americans have not landed on the moon. Bill Cassim said that the scene of the landing of the lunar rover looked as if a prop in the film studio was slowly "landed" by several steel ropes. In fact, even Brian O 'Lear, a former NASA astronaut, doubted whether Americans really landed on the moon. Brian was an American astronaut in the 196s and a consultant during the Apollo moon landing program. But Brian said implicitly, "I'm not 1% sure whether humans really walked on the moon." Former astronaut Brian's suspicion is a blockbuster for NASA, which makes NASA feel unprepared.

Now many countries, including American scientists, are skeptical about the US landing on the moon, and with the development of science and technology, more and more people are skeptical! Strangely, so far, we have not seen any official response from the United States. Neil armstrong, the first man to land on the moon, is still alive. Why not let him come out and clarify the facts? Is the United States simply dismissive of this, or is there something to hide? Perhaps they have realized that their American predecessors have lied.