In recent years, public opinion tends to be rational in the discussion that Guizhou Association for Science and Technology intends to recommend Ms. Wang Li, the chief engineer of Maotai Group, to be elected as an academician of China Academy of Engineering, clearing away the complicated cloud of comments. Most netizens believe that as long as they are elected openly, fairly and justly, as long as their scientific research level is excellent, they should not attach identity labels. In fact, there are strong researchers in any technical field, and they have the right to conduct it on a high-level platform through normal channels. A master's trick? This kind of self-confidence and courage should not be easily judged. Let technology belong to technology. Whether Ms. Wang can be selected in the end still needs more detailed, professional and higher-level evaluation and screening. Those indiscriminate contemptuous remarks are not the supervisory discussion attitude of rational science.
Screenshot of Guizhou Association for Science and Technology Promotion
The purpose of organizing the publicity of the personnel to be recommended is nothing more than telling everyone that the recognized scientific research workers in the industry have been initially selected and are willing to accept social supervision. As far as Ms. Wang Li's nomination is concerned, the Guizhou Association for Science and Technology did not shy away from the sharp doubts of some netizens, but expressed through the media that she had a clear conscience in the selection process. As far as scientific research is concerned, it is obvious that if we do not attach importance to the value of scientific and technological achievements themselves, or ignore them? Academician? It is very unfair for researchers to co-elect the legitimacy of nomination procedures and blindly publish extremely emotional comments outside scientific research. Rational questioning and discussion are valuable, beneficial and harmless for promoting and perfecting the scientific research selection process. What kind of abnormality is it? See? Mentality and behavior will be swept into the garbage dump of public opinion sooner or later.
Every course of treatment? Academician of the two academies? By-election is a hot topic of public concern. People not only pay attention to which researchers there are, but also pay attention to the new achievements, new directions and new trends of China's scientific and technological innovation. Scientific and technological innovation is the key to creating a better life. Only by constantly strengthening the wisdom of scientific and technological innovation in various fields can we have more choices on the road to a better life. For technological innovation and scientific research, it must be? Managing the world and the land? So, do ordinary people have food, clothing, housing and transportation? Grounding gas? It's clear that scientists need to put a lot of effort into it, so we can't exclude researchers who study liquor production? Academician? Under the co-option step.
Fairness and justice are the values of the whole society, and the discipline of co-election of academicians must not be relaxed. This is an era in which information acquisition and exchange of views are relatively convenient, and the degree of supervision informationization and supervision efficiency are relatively high. There is no shortage of channels for social forces to promote scientific and technological work. It is the common pursuit of the whole society to improve the scientific research system and reform the innovation mechanism. What can we do to make up for it? Academician of the two academies? The regret in the co-option is also generally recognized by the whole society. However, whether it is to reform or make up for regret, in this process, it is necessary to inject a rational attitude into netizens and the public who care about and support scientific and technological innovation, instead of hiding behind the screen and taking ridicule and venting anger as personal matters.
Extended reading
Central media talk about Maotai's shortlisted academician candidates: Caution!
Recently, according to the website of Guizhou Association for Science and Technology, Wang Li, the chief engineer and chief quality officer of Maotai Group, was recommended by Guizhou Association for Science and Technology to be included in the list of co-opted academicians of China Academy of Engineering. As soon as the news comes out, people associate it with many years ago? Tobacco academician? Controversy, even ridicule? Academician of Liquor? .
Academician is the highest honorary title in China's scientific and technological circles. The recommended are all scientific and technological workers who have made achievements in promoting the scientific and technological progress of the country and society. The brewing industry itself is controversial, and The Lancet, the world's top medical magazine, has clearly pointed out that any dose of alcohol is harmful to health. In 2020, the World Health Organization urged governments to take measures to limit alcohol, because alcohol is not only harmful to health, but also causes violence and mental problems. Recommend commitment research? Brewing? It is difficult for technical researchers to represent academicians. Rejuvenate the country through science and technology? At the same time, it will also cause people to question the research direction of social science and the recommendation and selection criteria of academicians.
On the other hand, Maotai Group is a well-known brewing enterprise with a high market position, ranking first in Guizhou in terms of tax payment for three consecutive years. In this context, the chief engineer of Maotai Group was recommended by Guizhou Association for Science and Technology to be included in the list of co-opted academicians of China Academy of Engineering, which is also the focus of discussion. Has the selection been influenced by market factors other than scientific research results? If elected, will the biggest beneficiary be the brewing enterprise where he works?