What are the main problems and reasons in the current security risk assessment of some enterprises?
1. Qualitative analysis is more than quantitative analysis. Resulting in unscientific safety risk assessment. Some enterprises have not established special risk assessment institutions, let alone specific safety risk assessment systems and appropriate risk assessment methods. In the process of safety risk assessment, there is no scientific or stereotyped assessment model to be applied, and in fact, it is difficult to establish a scientific assessment model suitable for the production activities of this enterprise by relying on its own strength. At this time, the main means is to make a rough analysis and evaluation of the risk factors affecting safety by relying on the leaders' years of work experience and intuitive judgment, the public's cognition and the suggestions of a few experts and frontline backbone. The evaluation process is very simple, and its risk factors are also used to being expressed by vague words such as "general, large, significant and extraordinarily large", and the specific quantitative value can never be used for quantitative evaluation. The conclusion has great uncertainty and deviation, which is obviously lacking. Although it can be seen on the surface that the enterprise has made a safety risk assessment of production activities, it is actually impossible to determine the quantitative degree of its existing risks and it is difficult to guide the enterprise to predict and prevent major accidents.
2. There are many leaders involved, which leads to the lack of targeted organization for security risk assessment. Leaders, experts, production backbones and front-line technicians participate in the whole production process, analyze the whole production process one by one, find out the hidden dangers and inevitable problems after the equipment runs for a period of time, determine the risk level, put forward the response plan and formulate corresponding evasive measures. However, in the process of concrete implementation, leaders usually hand over the task to a certain department, clearly put forward some requirements, and of course, they also have to personally ask or even participate. However, after receiving the task, some departments did not follow the requirements of their superiors, or even did not follow the basic methods of risk assessment procedures. Usually, they complete part of the content according to the division of labor, and the phenomenon of behind closed doors and on paper often occurs; Some enterprises even make some modifications to the past assessment report, that is to say, the safety risk assessment is completed by a few people in the office, and the front-line technical backbone, as the direct actors of production activities, rarely participates or does not participate at all, which makes the risk factor analysis based on imagination, judgment, intuition and experience unrealistic and makes the safety risk assessment lack pertinence, guidance and operability.
3. There are many superficial articles and few in-depth studies. The enterprise safety risk assessment that leads to the low quality of safety risk assessment has a complete evaluation system and method, which is an act of carefully investigating threats in the production process, rather than imaginary. How to do a good job of safety risk assessment in combination with the production and business activities of this enterprise? Many units do not study, explore or delve into it. In order to cope with the superior's inspection, they often only make superficial articles and become a mere formality. From the evaluation report, the basic elements are complete, but if you carefully observe the evaluation content, you will be surprised to find that most of the evaluation projects are copied or copied from others, and some projects have nothing to do with yourself. Can such a safety risk assessment report ensure the safety production of enterprises? Other production enterprises conduct safety risk assessment regardless of priorities and contents. It is conceivable that the value of such risk assessment results and the quality of safety risk assessment can be better. The analysis of the links that really need to be evaluated is not thorough, the research is not in-depth, and the evaluation content is not specific. The risk assessment report is stereotyped, "skimming water" and the focus is not prominent, which leads to the low quality of the assessment report and the loss of the real significance of the assessment.
4. The superior requires more grass-roots implementation. As a result, the implementation of risk assessment measures is not in place. Within an enterprise, organizational safety risk assessment should be a normal activity of the enterprise, which is entirely out of consideration for enterprise safety production. Whether it is the superior organization of the production enterprise or the first person in charge of the enterprise, overall, it still attaches great importance to the safety risk assessment of the enterprise, with arrangements, inspections, observations, spot checks and requirements, with the aim of standardizing the production order of the enterprise, making early prediction, early prevention and early response to prevent risks from bringing to the enterprise. However, in front-line production activities, due to repeated technological processes and skilled operating procedures, post operators are prone to "fatigue syndrome", and the phenomenon of paralysis and relaxation occurs from time to time. Inadvertently violating operating procedures and taking shortcuts by experience are common in many enterprises; More seriously, some enterprises will have problems such as "you say yours, I will do mine", and the requirements and safety measures of superiors will appear in the front line, regardless of whether they are asked or not. Although there are subjective and objective factors in these problems, if left unchecked, it will seriously affect the safety production of enterprises.
Saiwei security professional consulting team can help your enterprise solve the "problem" easily.
Step 1: Identify system hazards
● Standardized identification process
● Specialized identification tools
Step 2: Scientific risk classification
● Risk matrix method
● Hazard analysis method (LEC) for operating conditions.
Step 3: Optimize control measures.
● ALARP (minimum reasonable feasibility)
● Economical, reliable and effective
Step 4: Create a Risk File
● Graded filing
● Hierarchical control
Step 5: Introduce the system.
● Informatization of risk management
● Liquidity of risk management and control
Step 6: Dynamic control/early warning
● real-time monitoring
● Dynamic early warning
Risk management information system-safety eye,
It is an online HSE management system based on modern safety management concepts and methods. The system is based on systematic consulting scheme, with customer front-end system (Web/mobile software and mobile intelligent terminal hardware) and competition as professional support platform, which can perfectly aim at the characteristics of enterprise safety risks, connect production operations, accurately solve the most challenging safety management problems such as safety production system landing, employee safety training and education, real-time safety production risk monitoring and scientific decision-making, and comprehensively and effectively help enterprises solve typical problems and puzzles in HSE management. (The online management system of "Safety Eye" won the "20 17 Key Technology and Technology Project for Prevention and Control of Serious Accidents in Work Safety" by the State Administration of Work Safety for its outstanding application effect. Safety eye can greatly improve the efficiency of risk assessment and management!