Smoking is harmful to health. Why do so many people still smoke?

Is smoking really that harmful? I don't believe it. If we only compare the morbidity and mortality, how much higher smokers are than non-smokers, we can draw such a conclusion. That's a logical mistake. It can't be proved that these diseases are directly caused by smoking, let alone that smoking directly led to the death of some people. This is like randomly dividing people into two kinds, those who eat and those who don't; People who drink water, people who don't drink water; Married people and unmarried people. Then their morbidity and mortality must be different. But we can't say what disease we will get if we eat it, how harmful it is, how much higher the death rate of people who drink water than those who don't drink water, how many kinds of harmful gases, substances and elements are contained in the air, and we must not eat them, and so on. Such an inference can only scare non-smokers and has no effect on smokers, because this conclusion is groundless, specious and unconvincing. If stepping on nails is harmful, it is easy to prove. If you step on it with your feet, it hurts like hell, so you don't need much publicity, and people won't step on nails with their feet and hit the train with their heads. In my opinion, the harm of smoking should not be blindly concluded, let alone blindly concluded, which will only make the problem endless. It can neither convince smokers nor protect non-smokers. If we compare the incidence and mortality of any disease, then the incidence and mortality of smokers in many diseases are zero, such as SARS, which is known to all. But this does not prove that this is a great achievement of smoking. Because there is no direct connection. Some people say that Lin Biao did not smoke or drink and lived less than 60 years old; Zhou Enlai, who drank or didn't smoke, lived for more than 70 years. Mao Zedong, who smoked and didn't drink, lived in his 80 s; Deng Xiaoping smoked and drank, and lived for more than 90 years. What can this prove? Can you prove the great benefits of smoking? Obviously, you can't. Therefore, you can't convince people that smoking is harmful to health. So is smoking harmful after all? Why do so many people still want to smoke? I think smoking must be harmful, just as drinking water can be harmful. Some people die just because of a sip of water. As advertised, tobacco contains more than 4,000 chemical elements, of which at least 3,000 are harmful to human body. So that is to say, there are more than 1000 kinds that are good for health. Harmful elements, that is, they may damage some cells or functions of the body, but even these harmful elements are beneficial to the human body. That is, they not only harm people, but also destroy people's enemies and kill many germs and bacteria. Therefore, smokers suffer from far fewer diseases than non-smokers. In addition, there are more than 1000 elements in the smoke that are harmless and beneficial to human body. For non-smokers, it is a trace element that can never be absorbed, and it gives smokers many unproven benefits. Then you will find that around you, smokers are always strong, while non-smokers are old, weak and sick. Of course, this view is only the author's own view. This is not the reason why you should smoke or give up smoking. What's more, I don't want you to be confused and overwhelmed by the words "both executioner and philanthropist" with a cigarette case that "smoking is harmful to health". (Text/pen guest QQ 122324282)