Case analysis of accounting professional ethics in the interpretation of financial laws and regulations

I. Basic information

1. mccourt is on the list. On August 7th, 2000, a new stock was very popular in Shanghai stock market, and that was mccourt. Mccourt fabricated fixed assets of HK$ 90.74 million by forging financing lease contracts for import and export equipment. It is such a "fictional" company that was successfully issued and even ostentatiously listed.

2. Who will help him? During the listing of Maikete, Shenzhen Huapeng Certified Public Accountants issued a seriously inaccurate audit report, Guangdong Zheng Da United Assets Appraisal Co., Ltd. issued a seriously inaccurate legal opinion, and Southern Securities Co., Ltd. participated in the preparation of a seriously inaccurate issuance declaration document. China Securities Regulatory Commission will transfer mccourt and the relevant responsible persons of the above-mentioned intermediary agencies suspected of committing crimes to public security organs for criminal responsibility.

In the case of fraudulent listing in mccourt, the relevant intermediary agencies conducted an in-depth investigation. Without so many intermediaries "cooperating", McCourt could not go public by issuing shares. With so many institutions and barriers, any "no" may turn mccourt's dream into a pillow. Unfortunately, on this "fake assembly line", all intermediaries play an extremely disgraceful role.

3. All of them are folded by five dou meters. Huapeng Certified Public Accountants also participated in the fraud without knowing it. The reason is simple, that is the temptation of interests. Of course, so do other subsidiary bodies. Mccott issued more than 500 million yuan of shares, and the total issuance cost was 65.438+07.6 million yuan. Compared with 500 million yuan, 65.438+07.6 million yuan can only be regarded as nine Niu Yi points. The huge contrast between fraud cost and fraud income is an important reason for the rampant fraud in China's securities market. A vivid comment is that several intermediaries lost all their money for this mere17.6 million. Of course, it is not a small amount to allocate to various intermediaries.

Second, the case analysis

Although the ancient literati were poor, they didn't kneel down. Modern "economic police" can sell themselves for money. Although elegant, it is really sad. It is very important to pass the "money" barrier and ensure the integrity of the accounting team. Only in this way can its credibility be guaranteed. As members of the economy and society, accountants can get other incomes permitted by law, such as legal investment income, inheritance income, manuscript fee income, etc. But you can't get illegal income that affects accounting professional behavior. Otherwise, it will inevitably affect the fairness of law-abiding and law enforcement. Some people have no reason to excuse illegal accounting behavior on the grounds that accounting strictly enforces the law and loses customers. Just as people can't forgive poor people for stealing, what's more, accounting industry is recognized as a high-income industry relative to the income level of all walks of life. A high salary means more responsibilities and obligations. It is a very important professional ethics to ask accountants to keep clean and honest.