Require quality management system documents, and emphasize its implementation and effectiveness.
Improve personnel qualification requirements.
What are the newly published revised drug gsp appendices? At present, five appendices have been published, appendix 1: storage and transportation management of refrigerated drugs; Appendix 2: Computer system of pharmaceutical trading enterprises; Appendix 3: Automatic temperature and humidity monitoring; Appendix 4: Drug Acceptance and Acceptance; Appendix 5: Verification Management.
What new management concepts and methods have been introduced into the newly revised drug gsp? Added quality risk management, system internal audit, equipment verification, computer information management, automatic monitoring of storage temperature and humidity, and drug cold chain management.
20 15 What terms have changed in the newly revised gsp? Specific modifications include:
(a) to establish the basic positioning and requirements for the construction of drug traceability system. One article is added to the General Provisions, which reads: "Pharmaceutical trading enterprises shall establish a drug traceability system in accordance with the relevant requirements of the state, so as to realize the traceability of drug sources, destinations and responsibilities". At the same time, considering that there are clear regulations and rules on the traceability of special drugs, one supplementary provision is added, which reads: "The traceability system of drugs under special management shall comply with relevant state regulations".
(two) delete or modify the contents related to the mandatory requirements of electronic supervision code scanning and data uploading. Specifically including:
1. Delete the original Article 81 "For drugs subject to electronic supervision, the enterprise shall scan the electronic supervision code and upload the data to the platform of China Drug Electronic Supervision Network in time", the original Article 102 "For drugs subject to electronic supervision, scan the code and upload the data when leaving the warehouse" and the original Article 176 "For drugs subject to electronic supervision, scan the code and upload the data when selling".
2. Delete the contents of "scanning and uploading data of drug electronic supervision code" in the original article 84 and "scanning and uploading data of electronic supervision drugs in accordance with the provisions of Articles 81 and 82 of this specification" in the original article 161.
3. The original article 82, if the enterprise fails to print or paste the China drug electronic supervision code according to the regulations, or the printing of the supervision code does not meet the specified requirements, it shall be rejected. If the supervision code information is inconsistent with the drug packaging information, the supplier shall be inquired in time, and it shall be revised as "the enterprise shall reject the drug that cannot be traced back". If the traceability information is inconsistent with the drug packaging information, it should be inquired from the supplier in time. "
(3) Amending the Implementation Provisions for Electronic Supervision of Drugs to the Implementation Provisions for Traceability of Drugs. Specifically, it relates to item 2 1 of the former article 36 and item 138 17 of the former article.
(four) delete or modify the content that requires the enterprise computer system to "meet the implementation conditions of drug electronic supervision". Specifically including:
1. Delete "and meet the implementation conditions of electronic drug supervision" in the original Article 57.
2. The original article 149th "An enterprise shall establish a computer system that can meet the requirements of operation and quality management and meet the implementation conditions of electronic drug supervision" is amended as "An enterprise shall establish a computer system that can meet the requirements of operation and quality management and meet the requirements of drug traceability".
Aiming at the problems of entrusting third-party transportation and cold chain management, the newly revised drug gsp was published on February 9, 2065438, and officially implemented on June 0. Compared with the current standard, the new version of GSP has obviously improved the requirements for enterprise management quality management and effectively enhanced the ability of drug quality risk control in the circulation field.
In view of cold chain management, the new GSP has raised the requirements for cold chain drug storage and transportation facilities, especially stipulated the handover procedures of cold chain drug transportation and reception, temperature monitoring and tracking inspection requirements, and put forward higher requirements for the quality assurance ability of high-risk varieties.
What changes have been made to the Regulations on the Administration of Commercial Franchise in 2007 on the basis of the original regulations? The first point is that all enterprises engaged in franchising in China must go to the competent commercial department for the record; Second, it is more inclined to protect the interests of franchisees; The third question is about punishment.
What changes and adjustments have been made to the "experimental draft" in the newly revised mathematics curriculum standard? Accurately grasp the characteristics of standard changes, form specific practical operation methods based on cases, and pay attention to general teaching materials.
It is three core links.
Further clarify the educational concept of "student-oriented development" and grasp the changing characteristics of "from two foundations to four foundations, from two abilities to four abilities, from single thinking to compound thinking, adding multiple core words".
The revised curriculum standard inherits and develops the curriculum standard of experimental draft. After studying the revised curriculum standard, I think the following three changes are the most profound.
Debugging the view of mathematics and establishing a new view of mathematics curriculum.
According to the curriculum standard of the experimental draft, "Mathematics is a process in which people qualitatively grasp and quantitatively describe the objective world, gradually abstract and generalize, form methods and theories, and widely apply them." The revised standard adjusts it to "Mathematics is a science that studies the relationship between spatial form and quantity." Mathematics is a science, not a process. Whether it comes directly from the real world or from the mathematical world, as long as it is the spatial form and quantitative relationship, it can constitute the research object of mathematics. At the same time, the original mathematics curriculum view of "everyone learns valuable mathematics, everyone gets the necessary mathematics, and different people get different development in mathematics" is revised to "everyone can get a good mathematics education and different people get different development in mathematics."
Exhibition ",such an expression, retains the essence of the mathematics curriculum view defined by the experimental draft curriculum standard.
Clearly put forward the requirements of "four foundations", "four abilities" and compound thinking.
. On the premise of paying attention to basic knowledge and skills, the training goal for students increases the specific requirements for basic ideas and basic activity experience, highlights the special role of mathematics in students' development, and makes it clear that there is no clear related idea in the experimental draft standard, which is the purification and sublimation of the successful experience of 10 reform.
For the problem of ability training, not only the ability training is directly put forward, but also the ability requirement of "finding problems and asking questions" is added.
. This change not only fully continues the emphasis on innovation spirit in the experimental draft, but also has significant development.
The revised curriculum standard clearly puts forward the specific requirements of paying equal attention to inductive thinking and deductive thinking on the basis of continuing to pay attention to inductive thinking and speculative thinking.
In the core words, geometric intuition is added, the sense of symbol is changed to the sense of symbol, the concept of statistics is changed to the concept of data analysis, and the connotations of number sense and space concept are revised. Core words are the "key points" of standards, which are very important for correctly understanding and accurately grasping standards. For "number sense", we need not only primitive "sense", but also moderate "enlightenment" on the basis of sensibility; Adjust "statistical concept" to "data analysis concept" to highlight the core position of data in statistics and probability research.
Taking typical cases as the carrier, this paper combs the changing characteristics of curriculum content standards, and further clarifies the core objectives and curriculum teaching requirements in various fields.
Compared with the experimental draft, a highlight of the revised curriculum standard is the addition of a large number of rich typical cases. With the help of these typical cases, we can well grasp the changes of course content and further clarify the core objectives in various fields. In the daily teaching activities of junior high school mathematics, we can directly borrow these cases.
It is suggested to adopt the strategy of "one center, two basic points, three grasping hands, six changes, one main channel and three methods" to promote mathematics teaching practice. The "one center" here is all about students' all-round, healthy, harmonious and sustainable development, which is referred to as "student-oriented development", which is the basis of the concept of curriculum standards. "Two basic points" that is, "Curriculum is experience and activity", that is, the curriculum must be based on students' original life experience and mathematics activity experience, which is the basic point of mathematics curriculum implementation. At the same time, mathematics teaching is an active mathematical thinking activity carried out by teachers and students. Without the premise of "experience" and the connotation of "mathematical activities", the value pursuit of mathematics curriculum will be lost. "Three stresses and one hand" refers to the selection of mathematics teaching materials, which must be carried out around three elements: "truthfulness", "interest" and "rich subject connotation". The "truth" here not only considers the real world, but also pays attention to the "truth of students"-that is, the materials that students like and are familiar with. "Six transformations" refers to the transformation of mathematics view, curriculum teaching material view, teaching view, student view, evaluation view, information technology and mathematics curriculum integration and curriculum resources view. In particular, the revised curriculum standard enriches the connotation of "teaching view" and adds "active participation" on the basis of "interactive development". Classroom participation needs to go from behavioral participation to thinking participation to emotional participation. Only when students take the initiative can they become real classroom participation. At the same time, establish a new concept of students' learning, that is, "students' learning should be a lively, active and personalized process ... students should have enough time and space to experience activities such as observation, experiment, guess, calculation, reasoning and verification. "'a main channel' means that classroom teaching is the main channel for curriculum implementation, and all ideas should be transformed into specific classroom teaching behaviors." "Three methods" refer to case study, action study and school-based study. These are the three most effective ways to promote the curriculum reform accumulated in the 10 reform.
Ielts listening basics. Standard course (latest revision) download IELTS listening put~ The above information is fairly complete, as well as Hujiang ~
How many chapters are there in the newly revised Quality Management Standard for Pharmaceutical Trading? The general provisions are divided into "quality management of pharmaceutical wholesale" and "quality management of pharmaceutical retail". The provisions are divided into four chapters * * * 187, including 1 17 for wholesale and 60 for retail.
What are the standards and requirements for science and technology software enterprises to participate in bidding? 1. What is the legal basis for the bidding of science and technology projects?
A: Mainly the following laws, regulations and normative documents: Bidding Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), Interim Measures for the Management of Bidding for Science and Technology Projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Measures for the Management of Bidding for Science and Technology Projects in Jiangsu Province of the Provincial Science and Technology Department, Operating Rules for Bidding for Science and Technology Projects of the Provincial Science and Technology Department and Regulations for the Management of Bidding for Science and Technology Projects in Jiangsu Province will be issued soon.
2. What are the particularities of bidding for science and technology projects?
A: According to the Bidding Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), it is the construction project that must be tendered according to law. Judging from the legal conditions of bidding, the bidding of science and technology projects belongs to voluntary bidding, not to statutory mandatory bidding, but it must be legal as long as bidding is adopted.
Generally speaking, the bidding for science and technology projects has the following particularities:
(1) Scientific research and development is exploratory, innovative and risky.
In order to reduce the risk, the Ministry of Science and Technology's "Interim Measures for the Management of Bidding for Science and Technology Projects" stipulates that bidding by stages can be adopted. The first stage of bidding is mainly to obtain the technical and economic indicators, technical scheme and pre-tender price of the bidders, so as to improve the bidding documents, and the second stage is to finally determine the winning bidder.
(2) Science and technology projects have certain uncertainties.
Because the research depth is different and the funds needed are different, the lowest quotation of the bidder cannot be the only reason for winning the bid. It is necessary to comprehensively analyze the feasibility and advancement of the technical route, the research and development conditions of the undertaking unit, the quality of personnel, the credit rating, the management ability, the rationality of the budget and many other factors.
3. How to choose the science and technology bidding project?
A: The Interim Measures for the Administration of Bidding and Tendering of Science and Technology Projects stipulates that some projects with clear objectives, definite completion time and determined evaluation criteria, such as technology research and development, technology transfer and promotion, and technology consulting services, which are mainly funded by * * *, and do not involve national security and state secrets, should be subject to bidding.
Project selection should follow the following principles:
(1) The selected projects are in line with the direction and focus of financial support for science and technology;
(2) The selected projects should belong to the key technologies, leading technology research and tackling key problems with universal significance in economic or social development.
The research of enterprise's proprietary technology should not be used as a bidding project;
(3) The content of the project objective is clear, the completion time is clear, and the evaluation standard can be determined;
(4) A certain number of units that can undertake the project can cause effective bidding competition, that is, at least three or more units participate in bidding competition.
Science and technology projects that meet one of the following conditions shall not be subject to tender:
(1) projects with large target uncertainty (project indicators are difficult to quantify) and the evaluation criteria are difficult to determine;
(2) Projects involving national security and state secrets;
(3) There are only two or less potential bidders to choose from.
4. What problems should joint bid pay attention to?
A: joint bid refers to the behavior that all parties jointly contribute capital according to the agreement, agree on the bidding subject, bid, take risks and enjoy intellectual property rights.
Science and technology project joint bid must pay attention to the following aspects:
(1) All parties in joint bid are qualified to bid, and have the ability of capital contribution and project organization and management;
(2) All parties in joint bid must sign the joint bid Agreement, specifying the investment amount, ownership of intellectual property rights, project management mode, responsibilities, etc.
(3) All parties to the joint tender shall reach a written agreement on the preparation of tender documents, organization of bid evaluation, determination of the winning bidder, signing of the contract and project management after winning the bid.
5, science and technology project bidding need pre-tender estimate?
The Bidding Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) does not explicitly require whether a pre-tender estimate must be set for a project subject to tender. Article 14 stipulates that "if there is a pre-tender estimate, the pre-tender estimate shall be taken as reference".
The Regulations on the Management of Bidding in Jiangsu Province, which is being formulated, stipulates that "the tenderer may decide whether to prepare the pre-tender estimate according to the characteristics of the project.
The preparation of pre-tender estimate, the preparation process of pre-tender estimate and the pre-tender estimate must be kept confidential.
Encourage the use of tender with bill of quantities and tender without base price ".
Due to the uncertainty of science and technology projects, the pre-tender estimate is generally not prepared.
6. What are the contents and requirements for compiling the tender documents?
Answer: The bidding documents should include the instructions for bidding, the task book of the bidding project, the framework and requirements for compiling the bidding documents, etc. The task book of bidding project is the most important part of bidding documents, and it is the basis for bidders to prepare bidding documents.
Attention should be paid to the preparation of the project task book:
(1) The main technical contents, objectives and assessment indicators of the project must be clear;
(2) The form and quantity requirements, schedule and time requirements of the project results must be specific;
(3) The ownership, transfer and transformation of the results must be made clear.
When preparing the tender documents, there shall be no content aimed at or excluding potential bidders, except as stipulated by relevant state laws and regulations.
(1) The technical and economic indicators, technical parameters and technical routes in the bidding documents cannot be set by specific units.
(two) shall not contain other contents that tend to or exclude potential bidders.
7. How to modify and supplement the issued bidding documents?
Answer: When the tenderee finds that there are omissions or errors in the sold bidding documents, it can modify and supplement them.
However, all potential bidders who have obtained the bidding documents shall be notified in writing before the deadline for submission of bidding documents 15.
The revised and supplemented contents are an integral part of the tender documents.
If there are major amendments and supplements to the bidding documents, the deadline for submitting the bidding documents shall be appropriately extended.
When modifying and supplementing the contents of the tender documents, the following points should be noted:
(1) When modifying and supplementing the bidding documents, first of all, a written notice shall be given; Second, all potential bidders who have obtained the tender documents should be notified.
(2) When modifying and supplementing the bidding documents, the prescribed time limit shall be strictly observed, so that all potential bidders who have obtained the bidding documents will receive written notice of modification and supplementation five days before the bidding deadline/kloc-0.
8, science and technology bidding project bidders should have what conditions?
A: Any legal person or other organization that responds to the bidding and participates in the bidding competition can become a bidder for science and technology projects.
The so-called responsive bidding refers to that after the potential bidders obtain the bidding information or invitation letter, they purchase the bidding documents according to the requirements of the tenderer, prepare the bidding documents and participate in the bidding.
Bidders must meet the following conditions:
(1) Having researchers, equipment and funds suitable for the requirements of the tender documents;
(2) Having the qualifications required by the tender documents and relevant R&D capabilities and achievements;
(3) It has a good reputation;
(4) Other conditions stipulated by laws and regulations.
9. What problems should bidders pay attention to when preparing bidding documents?
Answer: The tender document is the direct response of the bidder to the tender document, and the tender document should answer the substantive requirements and conditions put forward in the tender document.
When preparing the tender documents, it is necessary to discuss the following topics:
(1) Grasp the theme.
Bidders should carefully study and correctly understand all the contents of the bidding documents, and on this basis, prepare the bidding documents as required to avoid digression;
(2) Strict specification.
The bidding documents must fill in and explain the main contents of the bidding documents, such as R&D content, technical requirements, project price and implementation plan.
Shall not modify the requirements of the tender documents, shall not omit or avoid the questions that must be answered in the tender documents, and shall not put forward any additional conditions;
(3) true and effective.
The contents specified in the bidding documents and the supporting materials provided must be true and reliable, objectively reflect the situation of the bidder, and shall not resort to deceit;
(4) Overall consideration.
The contents of the tender documents may involve technology, economy, credit and other aspects, therefore, the bidder shall organize relevant department personnel to prepare separately.
At the same time, the contents of the whole bidding document should be consistent and coherent;
(5) Set up documents reasonably.
A complete and qualified bidding document should not only have detailed contents, but also cover, table of contents, header and footer. , and be reasonable and appropriate in page layout, title setting, font, font size, chart description color, etc., which not only conforms to the rigor of scientific and technological projects, but also reflects its own characteristics.
10, what are the rules for sending and receiving bid documents?
Answer: The tenderee shall deliver the bid documents to the designated place in a sealed manner before the deadline for submission of bid documents.
The tenderee shall sign and record the received bid documents and shall not open them.
Bidders have the right to require the tenderee to provide proof of receipt.
Generally, there are three ways of delivery: direct delivery, entrusted delivery and mail delivery.
It is particularly important to note that if the bid documents are mailed, the bidder should leave time for mailing to ensure that the bid documents can reach the place designated by the tenderer before the deadline.
Not "postmark".
In any of the following circumstances, the tenderer shall refuse to accept it:
(1) The bid documents shall be delivered after the deadline for submission of bid documents;
(2) The bid documents are not sealed or poorly sealed.
1 1. What are the provisions for the supplement, modification and withdrawal of the bid documents submitted?
Answer: There are the following provisions for the supplement, modification and withdrawal of the submitted bidding documents:
(1) Before the deadline for submission of bid documents, the bidder may supplement, modify or withdraw the submitted bid documents, and notify the tenderer in writing.
The supplementary and modified contents are part of the tender documents;
(2) The bidder shall not supplement, modify or withdraw the submitted bid documents after the deadline required by the tender documents.
12. What should joint bid pay attention to?
A: Several legal persons or other organizations can complement each other and jointly bid for a scientific and technological project as bidders.
Joint bid should sign the joint bid Agreement, define the main tendering units and tendering units, and stipulate the corresponding responsibilities and rights of all parties.
Joint bid should pay attention to: First, based on the principle of equality and mutual benefit, study the scientific research strength, investment, ownership of intellectual property rights, transformation of achievements, industrialization and other issues needed to complete the project, and sign the joint bid Agreement, clearly stipulating the work, responsibility, ownership of achievements and ownership of the right to use.
Second, when preparing the tender, it is necessary to provide relevant materials and cooperation agreements from all parties in joint bid to prove the R&D capability and cooperation content.
Third, the same R&D team can only bid for a bidding project once.
13. What is the basic procedure for bid opening?
Answer: The bid opening is presided over by the tenderer, and all bidders are invited to participate, so as to ensure that the bid opening is conducted openly, fairly and justly with the participation and supervision of all bidders.
The basic process of bid opening can be divided into three steps:
(1) Check the seal of the tender.
The bidder or the bidder's representative may check the bid documents delivered on time and sign for confirmation.
(2) All bid documents that have been inspected and sealed in good condition will be opened by the staff in public.
(3) Read the list of bid opening.
On-site staff should sing and read the names of all bidders, bid quotations and other contents that the tenderer considers important.
14, how to deal with the bid-losing project?
When the number of bidders for science and technology bidding projects does not reach three, the bidding will be suspended as a bidding project.
According to the situation, the tenderer may transfer the project subject to tender for examination or reorganize the tender.
15. what is the principle of withdrawal of members of the bid evaluation Committee?
A: In order to ensure the fairness and justice of bid evaluation, the withdrawal system of members of the bid evaluation committee must be implemented.
Experts who have direct interests with bidders or are members of the research group composed of bidders shall not serve as members of the bid evaluation committee.
The so-called direct interest refers to working in the same unit as the bidder, being hired as a consultant by the bidder, and having a teacher-student relationship with the project leader of the bidder.
The tenderer shall examine the members of the bid evaluation committee when hiring them, and the bidder shall provide relevant information of the members of the research team when submitting the tender.
Secondly, the tenderer shall announce the withdrawal system of members of the bid evaluation committee to all bidders' representatives at the time of bid opening, reminding bidders of the right to apply for withdrawal of members of the bid evaluation committee and explaining the reasons; If no application is made at the time of bid opening, there is no right to apply again after bid opening.
Third, when the tenderer announces the instructions for bid evaluation, he reminds the members of the bid evaluation committee that they can voluntarily ask for withdrawal according to the principle of withdrawal.
16. When do I need to reply?
Answer: Generally, bidders are not arranged to reply in the evaluation of science and technology projects, and the evaluation is mainly based on the bidding documents.
If the bid evaluation committee thinks that there are ambiguities in the bid documents that need to be answered, it may also arrange for the bidders to answer, but the content of the reply shall not exceed the scope of the bid documents, nor shall it change the substantive content of the bid documents, and the content of the reply must be recorded in written form.
17, how to formulate the standards and methods of science and technology project evaluation?
A: Different bidding standards should be formulated for different types of scientific and technological projects.
However, the evaluation criteria for any science and technology project bidding should at least include the following three aspects:
Advantages of (1) technical scheme.
By comparing and analyzing the rationality of technical route, the innovation of technical scheme, the advancement of technical and economic indicators, the feasibility of completing the goal and the risk of implementing the technical scheme, the superiority of its technical scheme is comprehensively judged;
(2) The bidder's ability to undertake this project.
By comparing and analyzing the academic level and management ability of the project leader, the rationality of the professional knowledge structure of the members of the research group, the basis of research work and the conditions of research equipment and instruments, we can comprehensively judge their R&D strength, that is, their ability to undertake the project;
(3) Rationality of budget and arrangement.
Due to the particularity of science and technology projects, we should focus on evaluating the rationality of their budgets and arrangements based on the original investigation that can not only ensure the timely completion of the projects, but also maximize the economic and social benefits of the project investment, rather than taking the lowest tender offer as the main reason for winning the bid. However, for projects with pre-tender estimate, the pre-tender estimate should be referred to.
Generally, the comprehensive evaluation method should be adopted in the evaluation of science and technology bidding projects, that is, the method of combining quantitative indicators with qualitative indicators. The bid evaluation committee will make quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation according to the comprehensive evaluation index system, get the average score of each bidder, make a written bid evaluation report, and recommend qualified bid-winning candidates to the tenderer.
18. Under what circumstances will the bid be rejected?
A: The bid evaluation committee may confirm that the bid is invalid under the following circumstances:
(1) The bid documents are not stamped with the official seal of the bidder or the legal representative is not signed or sealed;
(2) The bidding documents are illegible and illegible;
(3) The bid documents do not meet the substantive requirements specified in the tender documents;
(4) The tender offer is much lower than or higher than the actual cost necessary to complete the project;
(5) The bidder refuses to reply or make corrections to the bidding documents as required;
(six) without common consultation, bidding in a common way;
(7) The tender documents do not meet other conditions that the tenderer considers important as stipulated in the tender documents.
19. There are three valid bidders because the bid is invalid. Do you want to continue bid evaluation?
If there are less than three effective bidders in the case of invalid bids, the bid evaluation committee shall decide to continue or suspend the bid evaluation according to the specific circumstances.
There are less than three effective bidders, which leads to obvious lack of competition in bidding. If the bid evaluation committee decides to reject all bids, the bid evaluation will be suspended.
For projects with invalid bids, the bid evaluation committee only needs to explain the reasons for invalid bids in the bid evaluation report, and does not need to quantify the bids.
20. What is the main content of the bid evaluation report?
A: The bid evaluation report is an important basis for the tenderer to determine the bid, which mainly includes:
(1) list of bidders;
(2) the situation and description of the waste standard;
(3) Recommend and rank the successful candidates;
(4) the evaluation of the recommended candidate winning the bid, including the rationality of technical scheme, economic affordability, budget and arrangement.
The technical scheme includes the superiority of technical route, the advancement of technology and the advancement of technical and economic indicators. The commitment ability includes the academic level of the main person in charge of the research group, the professional knowledge of the members of the research group, the rationality of the discipline structure, and the basic situation of research and development. Rationality of the budget and arrangement of funds, including the quotation of funds, the budget of funds, whether the arrangement of the use of funds is reasonable, and the implementation of supporting measures for research, etc. ;
(5) Issues requiring further consultation and requirements reached through consultation;
(6) signature and minutes of debate;
(seven) the list of members of the bid evaluation committee and their signatures.
The bid evaluation report shall be signed by all members of the bid evaluation committee.
Members of the bid evaluation committee who have objections to the bid evaluation results may elaborate different opinions and reasons in writing.
2 1. If joint bid wins the bid, how to sign the contract?
Answer: If joint bid wins the bid, the tenderer may sign a contract with the winning bidder for scientific and technological projects. The rights, obligations and responsibilities between the winning bidder and the winning bidder shall be subject to the joint bid Agreement signed by all parties in the bidding documents.
22, science and technology project bidding can determine two winning bidders?
A: In principle, a winning bidder is determined for each scientific and technological project bidding. Under special circumstances, two winning bidders can be determined according to the needs, but different winning bidders should adopt different technical schemes to independently complete the winning project.
23. Is the tenderee allowed to conduct on-the-spot investigation on the candidate winning the bid before calibration?
Answer: Before determining the winning bidder, whether the winning candidate can be inspected on the spot mainly depends on the opinions and suggestions of the bid evaluation committee and the tenderee's understanding of the winning candidate.
If the situation of the candidate winning the bid is not clear, especially if it is necessary to conduct on-site inspection on whether he has the ability to undertake and perform the contract of the winning project, the tenderer may conduct on-site inspection on the candidate winning the bid before the selection.
24. What is invalid?
A: The so-called invalid bid-winning means that the final bid-winning decision made by the tenderer is not legally binding.
If a written contract has been signed between the parties, the signed contract is invalid.
The following actions will result in invalid bidding:
(1) The tenderer discloses to others the names and quantities of potential bidders who have obtained the tender documents or other tender-related activities that may affect fair competition, or discloses the pre-tender estimate, which affects the winning bid;
(2) The bidders collude with each other or with the tenderee to pay bribes to the tenderee or members of the bid evaluation committee in order to win the bid;
(3) Bidders bid in the name of others or resort to deception in other ways to win the bid;
(four) the tenderer violates the provisions of the bidding law, and negotiates with the bidder on the bidding price, bidding scheme and other substantive contents, which affects the winning result;
(5) The tenderer shall determine the winning bidder except the candidate winning bidders recommended by the bid evaluation committee according to law. After all bids are rejected by the bid evaluation committee, the candidate winning bidders shall be determined for the projects subject to tender according to law.