1. After the premature baby is confirmed dead? The resurrection doctor once shirked: you signed it. This is a major medical malpractice case that happened on 19. Mother gave birth prematurely at 26 weeks. The hospital directly determined that the child died after caesarean section and asked the mother to sign the certificate of giving up saving the fetus in advance. The key is that there has been a major misjudgment in this hospital. The fetus is still alive after birth, not dead at all. After staying in a sealed bag for two hours, he became severely cerebral palsy. What is even more exasperating is that doctors always talk about the maternal signature, and one of them said in an interview that it is normal to make a wrong judgment.
In fact, misjudgment is acceptable, but for a fresh life, whether it is humanitarian after birth should be seen twice to see if the child is still alive. Is it against the doctor's spirit to think that the child is stillborn directly and arbitrarily? Moreover, as the mother said, if the hospital had not vowed that the fetus would die, it would not have signed this agreement at all.
2. Compensation should be paid. The hospital made it clear that it would not shirk its responsibility. On September 1 day, the hospital issued a statement saying that it would not shirk its responsibility. However, at present, the hospital and family members have not reached an agreement on compensation. To tell the truth, there is actually a major BUG in this matter. If it is confirmed to be a stillbirth, there is actually no concept of rescue. Then why does it involve signing a no-bailout agreement?
In other words, even if the child is alive, there may be various functional problems due to premature birth. Has the mother of the child reached an agreement with the hospital not to rescue the child even if it is alive? The twists and turns may not be as simple as surface exposure.