Introduction: The so-called scientific method of psychology is based on the observation of individual or group behavior, emotion and language, and through the data analysis, induction and reasoning of people's basic psychological and conscious activities, a universal contract theory is formed. More mental health lies in the psychological network of fresh graduates.
Psychology is a science that studies the relationship between individual feelings, behaviors, emotions, consciousness and psychological activities.
The so-called scientific method of psychology is based on the observation of individual or group behavior, emotion and language, and deduces people's basic psychological and conscious activity types through data analysis, induction and reasoning, forming a universal contract theory.
Let's start with the observation mentioned in the definition. This scientific method may have the following problems:
First, whether the observer's observation will be influenced by the research premise and preemption hypothesis.
If it is based on assumptions, it is inferred from a static background, but the world is not static.
What do you see? Are your observation tools reliable?
When the amount of information is too rich and complicated, are inductive reasoning all right?
The second problem observed is:
Human observation is very subjective, and transforming subjective feelings into objective reality will take a huge risk of distortion.
For example, you can understand this sentence well:
Example 1: In the process of translation, what you see, when you get the conclusion, you have unconsciously processed the information, so you may not get all the information, and there is a great possibility of distortion.
Example 2: When two line segments are short enough, human eyes can't recognize them by visual inspection.
Therefore, people are limited, affected by limitations, and the observed results are not objective.
Therefore, any isolated psychological experiment or limited observation of human behavior, just as these two lines can get completely different results.
Let's start with the general agreement in the definition. Let me give you an example to understand:
China barks like a dog? Wang Wang? Americans learn to bark? Ow? . Wang Wang and Ao Ao are the generally consistent cognitive models under different observations.
Human knowledge needs language to express, and language must be based on a common protocol model, otherwise it will be difficult to understand each other.
Communication between people can be achieved through general agreements. If there is no general agreement, it is like dialing the wrong number. There is no basis for communication at all, let alone understanding. Unfortunately, this requires omitting the huge difference information. For example, when we say that a leaf is green, there are thousands of greens in the real world. We can only use a rough green to summarize all the greens, so in order to achieve communication, we omit the differences and omit the huge difference information.
Regardless of ancient times, modern times or the future, whether it is psychological experiment or measurement, whether it is group investigation or individual interview, it is to understand people's consciousness and unconsciousness, behavior and motivation, feeling and perception. As mentioned above, knowing the facts is not the same as the facts themselves. It is a common psychological practice to draw universal meaning from the analysis of individual or group behavior. In fact, this is very unreliable, because any phenomenon contains a huge variety of explanations, and its universal meaning is likely to be subject to the motives of observers.
;