Debate whether it is necessary to use dialectically to defeat magic with magic.

I think it is necessary to use dialectically to defeat magic with magic.

The reason for this is the following:

One is to defeat the devil with magic.

The method itself has certain risks and uncertainties,

Second, there is always a better way for me not to take magic over magic into account.

Third, according to historical judgment, this method of solving the problem has been denied.

Fourth, adopting this method will involve more innocent people. The problem is not

But instead of solving it, it's like a snowball rolling bigger and bigger.

(Analysis of the examples cited by Founder) 1. Jackie Chan's adventures and Daolon Wong always said that I would come back, which caused endless problems, just like the endless commotion caused by competing with the square dance aunt.

The second is the nuclear arms race.

First of all, the arms race is a way to prevent problems before they occur, that is, to prevent them before they occur.

Look, and magic over magic is the solution after the problem arises. So an arms race, developing one's own nuclear weapons and defeating magic with magic are two different concepts.

Secondly, all mankind is advocating world peace and reducing the number of nuclear weapons, including the United States itself, which is abolishing many nuclear products such as nuclear warheads. Therefore, the world does not accept the idea of defeating magic with magic.

Third, according to the other party's thinking, it is a last resort to defeat magic with magic, and there is no other means.

Summary:

Today's society has more diversified solutions, which are bound by laws and other rules and are no longer like primitive people.

Sample, answer blows with blows, lack of internal morality, and good external public order.

Beyond the bondage of vulgarity

Xiaomi shouji