The two sides of the debate: Sichuan team (positive) vs Hunan team (negative)
Positive point of view: Yugong is moving mountains
Opposite point of view: Yugong is moving people
Positive debaters: Chen Tingjie of Cangxi Baiejiang, Jin Jiyue of Pengxi Baiejiang, Wang Quanzhong of Ziyang Baiejiang, and Li Feng of Baiejiang Investment
Positive debaters: Tu Yanqun of Chenzhou, Luo Song of Yunnan, Nanbinqin of Baiejiang, and Bi Feng of Changsha Baiejiang
We have to be careful about what we say about this. >The opposing side: Chenzhou Baijiang Tu Yanqun, Yunnan Baijiang Luosong, Baijiang Jiang Nanbinqin, Changsha Baijiang Bi Zhengliang
Judges: Liu Haidong from Qiqihar Baijiang, Xu Lijun from Benxi Baijiang, Wang Pinhui from Qingyuan Baijiang, Xu Zhong from Nanjing Baijiang, Xu Chun from Nanjing Baijiang, Gao Rongxiang from Baijiang Investment, Cong Shufeng from Baijiang Investment
Statement of case
Positive Side First defense: Honorable moderator, the other side of the defense, colleagues, everyone! On the question of whether to move mountains or people, our point of view is: Yugong is moving mountains. I discuss from the following five aspects:
One, Yugong Yishan face up to the difficulties in life, the reality of the existence of contradictions do not hide, do everything from the actual starting point. On the other hand, moving people is a typical avoidance of contradictory behavior, is a kind of selfish, treat the symptoms but not the root cause of the practice, is a metaphysical point of view.
Secondly, by choosing to move the mountain and facing up to the contradiction, Yugong not only solved the problem of "access pedantry", but also provided his hometown with a broader space for development.
Three, the spirit of perseverance and unceasing struggle shown by Yugong Yishan has become the main body of the spirit of the Chinese nation. Historically, when our motherland faced invasion by foreign enemies, if there were not countless people like Yugong to struggle and sacrifice, can we still sit here today to participate in the debate?
Four, after Yugong removed the mountain, the transportation is convenient, more conducive to the exchange of information and material with the outside world in the. Because it is impossible to develop productive forces without solving the transportation problem.
Fifth, the process of removing the mountain is actually a microcosm of the human society in the development process of transforming nature and overcoming difficulties, "the spirit of removing the mountain" can make the productive forces to get continuous development and progress. If you don't move the mountain, you are not only giving in to difficulties, but more importantly, you are losing the opportunity to develop in the midst of challenges.
All in all, no matter in what era, Yugong Yishan is a kind of spirit that is worth promoting and carrying forward, and it embodies the team spirit of Yugong's family that has firm beliefs, works together and takes the whole situation into consideration. I believe that in our future study and life, the other side will work with us to prove this truth with practice countless times, that is, "the development and progress of the society needs the fool to move mountains".
On the other side of the first defense: Thank you, President, good morning! The beginning of the truth, the source of the truth. Today, our topic is "Is Yugong remove mountains or people", this topic is not discussing whether the spirit of Yugong is worthy of praise, but in the discussion of Yugong's method is desirable, we should debate is Yugong analyze the problem of the correct way of thinking, to solve the problem of the method chosen is reasonable. Therefore, the two sides of today's debate are judging whether it is desirable to move mountains or people on the basis of judging and choosing what they think is the optimal solution, and our point of view is that "Yugong is the one who moves people" for three reasons:
Firstly, the other side of the debate has just talked about the importance of the spirit of the spirit of Yugong, but from the logical point of view, the spirit of commendable is not the same as should be, both logically and logically. According to the viewpoint of dialectical materialism, human subjective initiative is important, but it must respect the objective law as a prerequisite, otherwise it will be counterproductive. Becoming a success is not only to dare to do, but also to be good at it. Even if we talk about the spirit, we must also comprehensively analyze the connotation of the "spirit of the fool", for example, which implies the "people will win", "paternalistic authority" and other spirit is worth reflecting on.
Secondly, we believe that the reason why "Yugong is the one who moves people" is because "doing the right thing is more important than doing the right thing". Like our opponents, we also believe that we can achieve great things only if we have strong beliefs and sufficient confidence, but only if we have the right goals and ideas. Yugong moved mountains because of the inconvenient transportation that affects the quality of life, but can we only move mountains by improving transportation? Is it feasible to move mountains? It is because of the incorrect goal of removing the mountain and the lack of feasibility of the project that the performance appraisal result of "commendable spirit but poor ability" was obtained. In the grand finale of the story "Yugong Yishan", the mountain was not removed by Yugong, but by "the emperor ordered the two sons of Kua'e to carry two mountains". Mr. Chen Wei, the chairman of the board of directors, said long ago that "there is never any savior, we do our own things, we can do our own things, we can do our own things". Therefore, when we do project research or decision-making analysis, we must first determine what is the right thing to do with a rational attitude and scientific method, and then go to do things right.
Thirdly, Yugong Yishan embodies the scientific spirit of seeking change and development in the midst of pragmatism. Through the "SWOT" analysis of Yugong's living environment and available resources, we have determined that the solution to the problem of Yugong's "circuitous access" is to "move people". "The solution is low-cost, effective and feasible; it focuses on environmental protection, respects human nature, and has a win-win mentality and a sense of resource integration. Shifting people means breaking the closed and rigid mode of thinking, advocating the combination of the efficacy of the way of thinking, the goal is to create a society in which people and nature are in harmony.
Based on the above points, we believe that "Yugong is the man who moves people".
The second defense: Our point of view: "Yugong means to move mountains". In the long history of human development, up and down five thousand years, across eight thousand miles, every progress of mankind is to face the difficulties and fight against them. Just as we in the process of development of Baijiang, will also encounter this or that difficulty, if we encounter difficulties to avoid, cowering, Baijiang will not be able to develop to such a brilliant as today, much less from a brilliant to another brilliant. In the face of difficulties, Yugong met them with a responsible attitude, reflecting his simple outlook on life and pursuit of values. And only when we, Panva people, have the most basic state of mind and responsible inner quality as a group and as individuals, Panva can become a gas expert in the true sense of the word. In the era of Yugong, mankind was in a period of ignorance, and few people had the courage and confidence to face the powerful nature. Yugong not only faced up to the reality of life, but also articulated his own unique insights, that is, the spirit of "endless children and grandchildren". Such boldness and courage were far beyond the time of Yugong's time, and greatly inspired people's fighting spirit. Today, we should inherit the spirit of Yugong's spirit of removing mountains, digging more than mountains, creating greater wealth for mankind, and making greater contributions to mankind.
Opposing side's second defense: Our first defense has elaborated from the logical point of view. I will elaborate our viewpoints from the theoretical point of view:
Under the historical environment that Yugong was in at that time, what Yugong wanted to solve was the transportation problem. Today's topic in fact gives Yugong two choices, one is to move mountains and the other is to move people. In the face of choices, the key to how we can think rationally and make rational choices is the method! What are the criteria for measuring the desirability of a method? The theory of economics tells us that the standard is "low cost, high efficiency, low input, high output".
First of all, in order to solve the transportation problem, Yugong and his children and grandchildren wasted their time in digging and transporting the soil, which was a great waste of manpower, material and financial resources, and the cost was huge. Life is only once for everyone, should this once life be used to move mountains? If the other side of the discerning friend is unfortunate to become the children and grandchildren of Yugong, you can still stand here to insist on your point of view?
Secondly, Yugong violated the laws of science, and it was objectively impossible to succeed. It must be known that "Taihang and Wangwu mountains, seven hundred miles square and ten thousand feet high", roughly calculated, the two mountains are about 234 trillion tons of soil and stone. Yugong transported the soil to the "Bohai Sea, the end of the hidden soil of the North", only one round trip per year, each time 5 tons, but also 5000 10 billion years. And scientists tell us that the total life of the earth *** is about 10 billion years, that is to say, when mankind have moved home to space, Yugong has not yet destroyed a corner of the mountain ah!
Once again, Yugong Yishan destroys the beautiful natural environment and disrupts the ecological balance. In today's ecological awareness is increasingly being emphasized, we do not advocate Yugong's solution to the problem. "People get the heaven and earth, the spirit of the bell of all things," should be done in harmony with nature, in order to be virtuous. If because of "in and out of the pedantry" on the groundbreaking and indiscriminate digging, is not "thousands of birds flying away from the mountains, ten thousand trails of the people trail extinction"? In advocating harmonious development, harmonious society today, do we still want to move mountains?
Let's analyze the situation of Yugong's removal.
First of all, Yugong move out of the mountains surrounded by may only need a few days and half a month to solve the transportation problem, low cost and high efficiency!
Secondly, whether it is moving people or mountains, its ultimate goal is to better communicate with the outside world. Since the solution to the same problem, it is certainly necessary to choose a method that is both realistic and feasible. Moving people embodies the spirit of realism. Creating openness and mobility is where historical progress lies, and since moving mountains is such a laborious process, it would be better to start everything from a practical point of view and move people.
On the one hand, moving mountains is twice the work, on the other hand, moving half the work; on the one hand, the hard work and sweat of moving mountains, on the other hand, the great wisdom and courage of moving; on the one hand, the helplessness of the closed mountain villages, on the one hand, the excitement of the outside world. I believe you will all make a wise choice.
In summary, we believe that Yugong should move people.
The third defense: "The Foolish Old Man Moves the Mountain" is a famous fable in our country, and this story can be said to be a household name. Since we were young, our teachers have taught us not to be discouraged when we encounter difficulties, but to learn the spirit of Yugong, who is not afraid of suffering or any difficulties; the spirit of daring to transform nature and conquer it; the spirit of daring to struggle and to win. Yugong Yishan is to liberate the mind, pioneering and innovative. It is to think what others before you did not dare to think, and to do what others did not dare to do. Yugong family with hoes, baskets, not to move mountains? Today, we are also advocating this kind of emancipation of thought, pioneering and innovative, bold spirit of practice? Hundred rivers of culture is not also the word "create"?
Throughout the history of China, there are many examples to prove that Yu Gong is moving mountains.
One, more than 60 years ago, Mao Zedong, in the seventh session of the General Assembly of China ****, it is the story of Yugong Yishan, united and led the masses of people to overcome all the difficulties and obstacles and remove the three "mountains" on our head, and achieved the victory of the revolution.
Two, Sichuan's famous Dujiangyan, the original Minjiang River upstream flow of water, into the irrigation county, the terrain suddenly low, the water slowed down, the hostage of a large number of sand and gravel deposited, silting the river, often flooding. Under the auspices of Li Bing's father and son, they led a large number of workers to move away from the pile, and built a water-dividing dike and a water-surge dam on the pile to spread out the water flow of the Mende River, which not only prevented flooding, but also facilitated shipping and irrigation, and made the Chengdu Plain the "Heavenly Capital" that guaranteed a good income in times of drought and floods. To this day, the people on the Chengdu Plain still enjoy the good life created by the ancients. This shows that Li Bing and his son made the right decision to move the mountain, and the practice of removing the mountain is worthy of respect for thousands of years.
Three, we today called the heavenly road of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway, is not the best embodiment of mountain removal? If there is no today's Yugong Yishan, the train can automatically through the mountain? It is our builders have the spirit of Yugong that built the Qinghai-Tibet Railway in just a few years.
Let's look at another example of the Yugong's efforts to move people.
Late in the Qing Dynasty, Li Hongzhang's "foreign affairs movement" is a typical Yugong shifted. He bought machines, factories, sent people to stay in the ocean in order to solve the old China's powers around, the national strength of the declining, the situation of precariousness. In the face of the feudal imperial system to the dynasty called itself closed to the "mountain", he chose in his opinion, the damage is small, low-cost approach, is to move people and not move the mountain. The end result was the signing of a series of powerless treaties, leading to the complete collapse of the Qing dynasty.
The most valuable quality in the fable of the fool removing the mountain is the firm confidence and unity of the fool's family and the team spirit of working together, which reflects the theme of our forum, "professional team", doesn't it?
So, I would like to reiterate once again our point of view that Yugong is the one who moved the mountain.
Opposing party's third defense: The first and second defense of our party have fully proved from the perspective of logic and theory that Yugong is moving people, not mountains, and the answer is already clear. Now let's go back to history and reality to see whether Yugong moved mountains or people.
We believe that Yugong Yishan is a kind of behavior that violates the objective law, and a kind of behavior that unilaterally emphasizes subjective initiative, and history has taught us a deep lesson about this. Let's go back to the tragic year 1958: the people of China embraced the spirit of Yugong Yishan, put forward the slogan of "man will overcome the sky", the whole nation made a big steel production, the grain output was exaggerated four times, the national economy was paralyzed, and a large number of people died of malnutrition. According to the population statistics released by the Chinese government, the death toll of the famine caused by the Great Leap Forward amounted to 35 million. 35 million, what a terrible number! This "Great Leap Forward", which was like a fool's errand to remove mountains, killed more people from starvation in three to five years than the total number of people killed by natural disasters in the 2,000 years prior to it. What kind of catastrophe is this?
Why did such a tragedy occur in Chinese history? This is precisely because people at that time made the same mistake as Yugong Yishan, blindly assuming that subjective initiative can create everything, without respecting the objective law.
On the other hand, we believe that moving people is low-cost and high-efficiency, and history and reality have fully proved it. Yugong once said that his children and grandchildren are endless, let's see what Yugong's children and grandchildren are doing. In order to improve the living environment and protect the ecological balance, the descendants of Yugong's hometown, Jiyuan City, Henan Province, have moved nearly 4,500 people out of the mountains, and developed Wangwu Taihang into a tourist attraction, so that the living conditions have been completely improved. By no coincidence, the million migrants of the Three Gorges Project created a miracle in the history of human reservoir migration. Is this a coincidence of history? No, great thinkers have long pointed this out, "Zhou Yi" has the cloud: poor is change, change is through, through is long. People have to find ways to change when they encounter difficulties, and there is change to continue to develop and achieve success.
Our liquefied petroleum gas enterprises are now exploring the new model of retail change, which is precisely because the people of Panva know how to adapt to the hard truth of long-term development? Besides, if our professional managers all hold on to the small farmer's consciousness of Yugong Yishan and stick to the old ways, how can our expatriates who have left their hometowns be ashamed of themselves?
Facts speak louder than words, on the one hand, the devastation and starvation caused by Yugong Yishan, and on the other hand, the people moved to live in peace and work happily and develop in the long run, history and reality fully proved our point of view: Yugong Yishan is to move people rather than move mountains.
□ Offensive Question
Opposing side's fourth defense: Do we emphasize human's subjective initiative in the face of difficulties, or do we solve the problem by scientific method in a practical way?
Forward four defense: I think the question you raised deviates from the topic, the topic of our debate is to move mountains or people? The first three debaters of our side have proved a very simple truth from all sides, move mountains for sure, they can't take a hoe to move people.
Forward a defense: China's Tibet region facing Mount Everest, I should say than the Taihang Mountain, Wangwu Mountain is even higher and bigger, you want to let the people living in the Tibetan region are moved to the Central Plains?
The third defense of the opposite side: I think we have all seen the scene describing the Himalayas played by Ge You in "See No Evil". So is it true that removing the Himalayas will improve the living conditions of the Tibetan people? Xu Benyu, one of the Ten People Who Moved China in 2004, gave up his prosperous city life after graduating from university and went into the mountains to teach, taking up responsibilities that he should not have taken up, and this spirit of his is very commendable, just like that of a fool's laborer. But I ask the other side of the debate, shouldn't every one of us be like Xu Benyu and go into the deep mountains to teach? Then every one of us wouldn't have to sit here in a meeting.
Forward four defense: you are strong words. Eight years of war, if we are moving people, then may I ask the other side of the defense, are we going to have a national migration?
On the other hand, don't forget that the Red Army's 25,000-mile long march was a migration.
Fourth defense: No, the Red Army's 25,000-mile march was to move mountains, to remove the "three big mountains" above us in an appropriate way.
The other side of the third defense: Yes, the purpose of the other side of the defense and we are the same, are to remove the "three mountains", but the premise is to move people can move mountains.
□ Free Debate
Fourth Defense: Just now, the other side has put forward a lot of arguments, but we think that their arguments have deviated from the theme of today's debate. The theme of today's debate is whether Yugong is moving mountains, and we have proved from all aspects that Yugong is moving mountains. Including the fable itself tells us that they moved the heaven when they moved the mountain, and the heaven only sent two immortals to move the mountain away. The story also shows that moving mountains is a real and irrevocable fact.
The third defense: Why do you say that the story of Yugong Yishan is a fable? Fable is the meaning of metaphor, like, does it mean that Yugong moved the mountain? If there is a history that can prove that Yugong has moved the mountain, why do we still need to debate here today?
Forward Debate 1: China's reform and opening up is going to face a lot of problems. If it is your kind of attitude, I advise you to buy four air tickets and go to the United States.
One of the opposing sides: If according to the other side's concept, shouldn't we walk to Beijing to participate in the debate today?
Opposing side's fourth defense: Just now the other side's defense said that moving mountains is in a responsible attitude, may I ask if you have been responsible for your children and grandchildren? Have you been responsible for the nature?
The first defense: the story of Yugong Yishan inspired the Chinese people to overthrow the "three mountains", may I ask the other side of the debate, is not it worthwhile for us to carry forward?
Opposing side: Did they do it in a brutal way? They are talking about a method, comrade!
Forward four defense: work, life, in fact, many times we are in the way of dealing with excuses, your removal is actually a kind of excuse, a kind of escape from reality, escape from the difficulties of the excuse.
One of the opposing sides: If the other side of the defense said that moving people is to escape, then why do you say that the spirit of the Three Gorges immigrants is to cooperate with the patriotic spirit of the overall situation, the dedication of self-sacrifice for the sake of public service, the spirit of collaboration of the people of all hearts, the spirit of hard work of entrepreneurial hard work?
Forward four defense: The Three Gorges migration you mentioned actually proves precisely that it is moving mountains, that we are removing people and then building the dam.
The third defense: Remind the other side of what you just said about removing people, isn't that exactly our point?
Forward four defense: you are stealing concepts.
On the other side of the first defense: the three gorges project is also to pay attention to the method, Dayu water is concerned about the dredging rather than blocking, this is the law of nature, respect for the objective law. The Fool's Gold is not a Supergirl, you can sing whatever you want.
The fourth defense: the so-called dredging and blocking, in fact, are two ways, which only proves that Yu Gong is using blocking this way to deal with the problem, but in the end, Yu Gong is still moving the mountain.
On the other side of the first defense: But the data have shown that when the earth is finished, the mountain has not yet been moved, this is a mountain if the mountain is old, ah!
Forward four defense: Yugong Yishan, in fact, with the development of the vision, with the day in looking at the problem, he was 90 years old still proposed to move the mountain.
The third defense: It is because he is 90 years old, so we are wondering if he is Alzheimer's disease.
The fourth defense: This is exactly the kind of spirit we want to advocate, the spirit of sacrificing oneself and not being afraid of difficulties.
On the other side of the debate: May I ask the other side of the debate, is Yugong an idealist, or a materialist?
Forward two defense: He is a combination of idealism and realism.
Opposing side's third defense: Just now, the other side's first defense mentioned that Yugong removed the mountain from the reality, and moved the people to escape from the contradiction, and we think that this kind of idea of Yugong is too selfish. He himself wanted to move the mountain, and then imposed his own ideas on his children and grandchildren, which is not the behavior of a feudal tyrant? Do we still want to learn this spirit from him?
The third defense: The most valuable quality embodied in the fable of Yugong Yishan is his firm belief and teamwork spirit, which is just like the theme of the Baie Forum that we all see today: professionalism, professional teamwork.
One of the opposing sides: I would like to ask the other side, when the Titanic met the iceberg, did he hit it to remove the mountain, or did he go around it?
Forward four defense: the example you cited deviates from the topic to be debated today.
The third defense: We believe that this example is necessarily related to the topic of today's debate. Just now the other side of the third defense said is to have strong confidence, confidence enough, good, this is our achievement of career must, but the premise is that we must have the right faith. Yesterday, Mr. Xu Zhong also said in his speech that a wrong instruction coupled with a crazy execution will be a disaster of all kinds.
Positive side of the first defense: our socialist construction is facing a lot of difficulties and problems, at this time are you choose to avoid it, our great northwest is going to become no man's land?
The third defense: Do you want to move all the mountains in the Northwest, do you know that the 100,000 mountains in Guizhou, there is another one after the removal of one ah?
The first defense: Then why does our country still advocate the construction of a new Tibet and a new Xinjiang?
The third defense: Yes, so we have to pay attention to the method, instead of the children and grandchildren are going to wield a hoe, digging a big mountain.
The fourth defense: your so-called method is to move all the people away, your moving people is a way, but if you move to a place and then encounter difficulties, and then move again, then your children and grandchildren will always move endlessly like this?
The third defense: the other side thinks we don't need to solve the problem if we move people? How many immigrant villages are needed for the Three Gorges migrants, and how much support does the state need to give, and is this not a difficulty? Similarly, our migrants should bravely take up the responsibility to face the difficulties and solve them.
Positive defense: the construction of the Three Gorges Project is to carry forward the spirit of our Yugong Yishan, which is the greatest and most macroscopic project of our country, which is not to move people but to move mountains.
One of the opposing sides: Yes, when we evaluate these great projects, we will say that the merit is in the present generation and the benefit is in the thousand years. But when Yugong was moving mountains, could he finish it? Can he finish it in the present time? If he dragged his children and grandchildren along with him to move the mountain for generations to come, would he have benefited in the autumn and the new year? If his children and grandchildren do not want to move the mountain, but want to come to our Hundred Rivers as a professional manager, what to do?
Forward four defense: the other side has been moving this topic elsewhere, we now want to confirm that we are not moving the mountain, whether it is the story itself or from the speech of Comrade Mao Zedong we can understand that Yugong is moving the mountain.
Opposing side's fourth defense: I would like to remind the positive side's defense to look at it clearly, our topic of defense is whether Yugong is moving mountains or people, not is moving mountains, not ing, not in the present tense.
Forward Debate 1: The spirit of Yugong Yishan has inspired us for many generations, and now we have to carry this spirit forward.
The third defense: I would like to remind the other side of the first defense that it is because of this spirit of Yugong Yishan that 1.1 million people died in Sichuan during the Great Leap Forward, which is an average of one death in every nine people.
The fourth defense: If it were not for the spirit of Yugong Yishan, we could not have won the war of resistance against Japan, and we would not be able to sit here and have a happy debate today.
The third defense: We do not deny that the spirit of perseverance and tenacity, but the spirit of the spirit of the Yogong Yishan also includes the spirit of man's determination to win the day, the consciousness of the small farmers, as well as the spirit of stubbornness and self-containment, which is also worthy of our learning?
Forward four defense: the removal of talent is stubborn, because you want to escape.
Positive first defense: the spirit of Yugong Yishan is a spirit of contribution, he did not enjoy, not to mention running away from conflicts and avoiding them.
The third defense: If he has the spirit of contribution, why did he not propose to move the mountain until he was 90 years old, and how many more years can he live? This job is all for his children and grandchildren to do.
Fourth defense: This just shows that he is advancing with the times, at 90 years old, he is still active and enterprising, and he wants to do things that other people cannot do.
The first defense: Then I would advise the other side, don't do what is not worth doing.
The third defense: In fact, what we are debating today is not about the spirit of Yugong, the key is still the method. We have to choose a low-cost and high-efficiency method for everything we do. May I ask the other side of the debate, if we are facing a river, do we go around it, or do we have to drink the river dry before going over?
Forward four defense: we have to build a bridge to get across. (Positive time)
Opposing third defense: the other side repeatedly emphasized that Yugong is moving mountains, this is not something you want to move to move, our second defense have just said that Yugong move this mountain need 10 billion 5000 years, obviously even the heavens think that Yugong is impossible to complete the thing, so they sent the Quartet two sons to carry away the two big mountains. In order to fulfill the wish of the old man to see the sea, we should do our best to help him to move the mountain, and help him to move the people out.
Opposing side's fourth defense: If Yugong didn't seize the time to move people out, communicate with the outside world more, intermarry, in the long run there will be inbreeding and pregnancy inside that small village, then the people in this small village will become less and less intelligent, and in the end, they can only move the mountain.
The second defense: hard work and endurance is not the whole of the spirit of the Chinese nation, pragmatism and adaptability is the spirit of the Chinese nation.
□ Concluding Remarks
Opposing side's fourth defense: It is a pleasure to discuss the topic of "Whether Yugong is moving mountains or people" with the other side's defense friend ****. Our two sides are in a war of words, arguing endlessly, in fact, the essence of the problem is: how to use simple and efficient methods to deal with the difficulties we face? We found that the other side's original intention is not changed, but the method is biased. Below, please allow me to point out a few problems of the other side of the defense:
1, blind optimism.
2. Pointing at a deer as a horse.
3, raising the soup to stop the boiling. Just because the spirit is worthy of esteem doesn't mean it should be done.
Just now we have analyzed and argued from theory, logic and facts that "Yugong should move people", we think: Yugong is to move people rather than mountains. In the following, I will further argue from the value level.
First of all, the progress of mankind is made possible by the "removal of people". "Human migration is the history of human civilization. Humans changed from climbing to walking upright, began to cave, moved out of the caverns and began slash-and-burn farming, moved out of the closed mountain villages, and began a commercial civilization, and resigned from the small-scale agricultural economy and industrial civilization, and constantly "moving people", and constantly progress.
Secondly, to "move people" means to break the closed and rigid thinking mode, and to advocate the modern thinking method of combining efficacy. Today, Panva is gradually developing and expanding, going out of Sanxiang and Sishui to East China, penetrating into Tianfu and South China, and marching into Northeast China; from the initial bottling business to today's pipeline business, and then value-added services; and from separate administration to the integration of various resources. Which is not reflected in the people of Panva "move people" thinking, which is not reflected in the people of Panva efficacy of the combination of modern thinking consciousness?
Thirdly, the "transfer of people" also reflects the spirit of seeking change in pragmatism, seeking truth from facts and respecting science. If you don't respect science, don't seek truth from facts, don't seek change for the ultimate goal of thinking, don't adjust to the wrong direction, and stubbornly insist on it, that is, if you try again, it's just a basket case, and you end up farther and farther away from the goal. In order to realize the mission of our company, we, Panva, did not stick to the once glorious bottling business and business model, but adjusted the direction in time to enter the pipeline network business and change the bottled gas retail business model to enhance our competitiveness. This is the embodiment of the spirit of pragmatism and change for the ultimate goal of Panva. Today, what Panva needs is the spirit of pragmatism and change, not the spirit of grandiose, blind arrogance and self-importance. The history of Baijiang is actually a history of practicality, change and innovation.
Talking about now, the victory or defeat is no longer important, we know that our purpose is very simple: that is, we gather together, the collision of ideas, collective wisdom, **** business Baijiang big plan. As Mr. Chen Wei said, "The business we started in Panva is an unprecedented business, our enterprises are in the north and south of the Yangtze River, and our business is rich in vitality." Doesn't the Fool's Gold reflect the spirit of truth-seeking, pragmatism, changeability and innovation of our people in Panva?
It is said that poor is change, change is communication, communication is long. We can only seek change in pragmatism and forge ahead in innovation to break the old, break the routine, and win the first opportunity for development and growth. Let us create brilliance under the guidance of Baijiang culture***!
Fourth defense: Our first, second and third defense proved that Yugong is moving mountains from all aspects, and I will add from the following aspects: Mao Zedong mentioned in a speech 61 years ago that we have to learn from Yugong in order to remove the "three big mountains" above our heads, and this is an example of that. This is an example. In addition, in the story, Heaven was moved to remove two mountains, which proves that Yugong was moving mountains. Our third defense also proved that Yugong was removing the mountains from the dustpan and hoe used by his family in the story. The other side has been leading us to change the topic to other direction, which is a kind of stealthy way, although you have eloquence, but in the fact of the story, black is black, white is white, black and white can not be reversed. In fact, these are not the most critical, the most critical is the other side of the defense to move people is simply a kind of irresponsible, to avoid the reality and responsibility of the practice, we can not advocate, especially our Hundred rivers of professional managers, and even more can not have this attitude.
Today at this time, we borrow Beijing this piece of treasure, borrow Tiananmen Square Monument to the People's Heroes