First of all, you heard me right. Yes, the syncopation of the first song is in the third beat, and the syncopation of the second song is in the fourth beat. I think there was a mistake in syncopation of the drum when I was making the second song.
Listening to music is also exquisite, such as cha-cha:
Just say two, three, qiaqia, one. In the most standard music, the second is light and different; On the contrary, this beat has drums; First, this shot is particularly boring and heavy.
Although the second song is not segmented correctly, the two beats of two plus one are correct, so it does not affect the overall sense of rhythm. People with a sense of rhythm are more likely to find the right beat.
The key to music is to listen more, because sometimes you need to follow the rhythm of the drums-by listening to the different characteristics of each beat, you can decide which beat is two; ; Sometimes you need to follow the rhythm of music-find out which beat is two by the natural rhythm of music. Usually the two are exactly the same, so jumping will be very used to it. As you pointed out in the second song, there is a little mistake, but it is not a big problem.
Of course there are exceptions. For example, "My heart is eternal" can dance rumba, but the rhythm can be determined by the first method above, not according to the natural rhythm. Because the rumba's four is a remake, and in the natural rhythm, four is a 3 in 1234, which is not right. You can try if you don't believe me.
Another example is pepito, which is the cha-cha dance used by Blackpool a few years ago, but you will find that it has no drums, and you can't find the rhythm according to the drums. Every beat is the same. In this case, we should follow the natural beat of music.
I don't know if you can understand it now, but if you can, it means that you can basically listen to music. But at least I have answered your previous question-I made a mistake when I was making music.
I hope I can help you. If you have any questions or don't understand, please leave me a message.
-
Regardless of the objective existence of music, I didn't say 1234. I said two ways to count the rhythm:
"Sometimes you need to follow the rhythm of the drums-decide which beat is two; By listening to the different characteristics of each beat; Sometimes you need to follow the rhythm of music-find out which beat is two through the natural rhythm of music. "
The first method is to listen to the sound characteristics of each beat, and the second natural rhythm is the objective existence of 1234. And as I said, in most cases, the two are completely consistent, so the formulas are "2341" and "2341", which are usually the same.
Just like the second song, except that syncopation is wrong, the beat characteristics of two and four also conform to the objective existence of the music itself 1234.
In addition, only some special songs need to be counted by the first method, and these songs are generally not used. This is a special case. If you are willing to count them with "sesame cakes", there is nothing wrong with that.