1. The content of the viewpoint
A perfect viewpoint generally speaking includes the following three aspects of judgment:
(1) description of judgment: the phenomenon reflects the essence of the problem is what, that is, to put forward the viewpoint of the essence of the problem. The essence refers to the social phenomenon behind the social problems, such as please talk about the views of violent attacks on doctors, in response to the violent attacks to name the essence, we need to see the violent attacks on doctors behind the current increasingly tense doctor-patient relationship. For the policy category, the descriptive judgment is to explain the background and purpose of the introduction of a policy. For the background and purpose of the introduction of the policy can be briefly summarized when putting forward the point of view, for example, to talk about the liberalization of the policy of two children's views, then we need to describe the liberalization of the purpose of the two children's main purpose is to alleviate the current serious problem of aging.
(2) Value judgment: whether the phenomenon or the policy is good or bad. For the phenomenon category, some questions are obviously bad, such as: "Now often occur in kindergarten teachers child abuse cases, what do you think about this?" Obviously, no one would consider child abuse a good thing, so it's okay not to make value judgments. If you want to make a value judgment, you should pay attention to the euphemism, for example: "It is sad that child abuse cases by kindergarten teachers happen from time to time", not "Examiner, child abuse in kindergartens is not good." For the policy category, you must make a judgment whether the policy is good or bad, that is to say, you have to have a clear point of view: whether to support the policy or oppose the policy, not both support and oppose, because the policy will either be implemented or repealed after the policy is introduced.
(3) normative judgment: the so-called normative judgment is to point out the general direction of the problem. For example, talk about violence against medical ethics views, we put forward the point of view to do normative judgment is to say: we should create a positive and good doctor-patient relationship, so that doctors and patients in the same trench *** with the fight against the disease.
Let's look at a sample question:
Sample question current, square dance prevalent, square dance is a fitness activity, but the music of the square dance nuisance, there are masses of people expressed resentment, and even conflict with the square dance mom, what do you think about this?
To put forward the point of view: square dance nuisance is in essence a conflict between the residents of the right to fitness and the right to rest (describe the judgment). If this problem is not solved, the conflict will continue to accumulate, seriously affecting social harmony (value judgment). We have to balance the relationship between the two and solve the problem of square dancing nuisance (normative judgment)
It should be noted that when making a point of view, it is not necessary to make descriptive, value and normative judgments at the same time. Depending on the characteristics of the topic, you can choose one, two, or of course, three. The importance of putting forward the point of view is self-evident, but also hope that the majority of candidates can practice more, master the high scores of skills, playing the first shot of comprehensive analysis.