No.
Now that the employment pressure on young people is particularly high, some people advocate that retiring too early in the market is too wasteful. Development is like a wheel; as long as the wheel in front reaches its destination, the wheels behind it will be able to get there.
While this is a bit harsh to say, it is a bloody reality.
Currently old enough to keep them in high places, with no way to retire, or simply unwilling to give up the power in their hands.
For example, the executives of enterprises or the president of a company, these people have been in their seats, the young people do not even have the opportunity to climb up the ladder, there is a retirement age instead of the young people's security.
There are also some netizens who say there is a serious bipolar split at this stage.
We retired at 60 years old, the result is that you say here that 60 years old is too early to retire, but we are 35 years old if we are unemployed, a lot of companies do not want to press.
Even if they do, they are some of the three enterprises or some of the small and micro enterprises, the five insurance and one gold are not able to pay.
So whether we are 35 years old and then employed, or 60 years old and then unemployed, this is very contradictory.
We also want to continue working, but the company does not want us, then there is no recruitment.
Another section of extreme netizens said, "I recognize what this expert said.
Why don't we just do it this way, the expert leads by example, and he or she will just keep working until the day they die, and then retire.
If you do, we'll admit that it's too early to retire at this stage, and then we'll keep working hard overtime and working hard.
If you don't have the means to set an example, just bumping your mouth up and down to come to a conclusion is more or less a no-brainer.
Enlightenment
We have a 90-something year old man inside this college who is still in the rehiring phase.
The old man can only walk by wheelchair, and he can't even speak well anymore, but the school is still raising that old man, why?
According to a teacher at the school with whom I have a good relationship, this man was associated with many of the great writers of the last century.
The schools or literary events represented by the associated writers would often invite the old man to attend their meetings.
And since this old man was too old to fly on an airplane or even have problems walking, this old man would give up more spots to his students.
In the words of our teachers, as long as this old man works in our school for one day, he will be able to go to another level for the education of our school, and he will be able to give more young people strength and opportunities.
For such a special group of people, we are of course willing to let them delay their retirement a little bit more, and it is best if the old man can live to be more than 100 years old.
Then this 100 years of time, has been hanging inside the school name, then this way, for our school, at least the next 10 to 20 years of opportunity to enjoy the world's top literary resources of this invitation.
But for the average hitman or the vast majority of ordinary people in society, delaying retirement is not really necessary.
Because most people are already in their 60s or up to 65, the age when they should retire.