Luoga was originally a college student who took a break from teaching because he couldn't afford the tuition and lost his tutoring job, and his rent hasn't been paid for several months. The following is my collection about "Crime and Punishment" read 7, welcome to learn reference.
"Crime and Punishment" after reading a
The dark night is deep.
The interlocking shadows of the trees outside the window sway like ghosts.
Turn on the light, the dim light reflected in the open pages of the book. The lines on the page gradually
blurred in my eyes. I began to search my mind for the few remaining fragments of memory.
A lonely soul struggles in the dark abyss, but in the black mist, he cannot find the way out? Little by little I approached Dostoevsky's ? Crime and Punishment?
Here in Petersburg, there is only a gray-blue sky, a dark scene. There are women with bruised eyes in Hay Square, women workers struggling to kill themselves in the filthy river, and little officials lying on the streets covered in blood from horse
carts? Maddened women with their children beg along the streets, and old horses are whipped by their owners so that they wail and finally break. In the villa around the corner there is also a loan shark old woman is staring with greedy, fierce eyes, eager to drain the poor of the last drop of blood and sweat?
Raskolnikov lives in this social context, and he steps into a terrible nightmare in order to escape from pain and suffering and to pursue light
and beauty.
On that dim moonlit night, the lonely black shadow, entered the old woman's house. In the cold moonlight, he lifted a sharp axe with his clean, trembling hands, and swung it fiercely at the back of the old woman's head, who was a loan shark. At that time, he may not only to the old woman, but also to the boundless darkness of society. He longed to tear the curtain of darkness and pain, so that people can see the light and hope booth!
But when the dark shadow saw the gurgling blood of the fallen old woman, saw the body drenched in red liquid,
saw his own blood splattered trouser legs, his pride in the success of the murder disappeared, leaving only a heart full of remorse, panic and helplessness.
He realized that he had done the most despicable and vicious thing?
He realized that he had done the most despicable and vicious thing, taking a live life and pushing himself
into the abyss of crime. His hand was no longer able to hold the heavy axe, and he had to let it fall with a piercing
muffled sound?
Raskolnikov was in pursuit of the good, in pursuit of self-redemption, but now he is tormented by himself, step by step towards destruction. Loneliness and guilt in his soul oppressed him, justice and conscience whipped him mercilessly, he felt like the dying horse he had seen in his childhood, bearing all the slavery, and have to suffer the ridicule of loneliness and pain. His fragile spirit broke down, and he fell into a nervous, sensitive morbidity. But even then, when he sees the miserable Mamemeradov family, he gives his best to help them, only because of the benevolence and kindness of nature.
When I read this, I wept for Raskolnikov's confusion and ignorance, was moved by his kindness and fraternity
, and angered by the ugliness and filth of society. Because the dark and turbulent society has distorted the goodness of his nature,
turning him into a man of contradictory personalities who concentrates rationality and irrationality, sin and goodness, and is withdrawn, dark and irritable,
but longs to confide in others, and aspires to a bright and peaceful life. He struggles in the world of opposites
wandering, lost and disoriented. However, under the inspiration of love and faith in his heart, he finally redeemed himself
and regained his life. I smiled with tears in my eyes when I saw this.
I realized that man has sinned with his body, but it is his heart that is most severely punished by God. Loneliness, pain, and trepidation surround him at all times, torment him, and even engulf him. This torture of the heart is a necessity for man's salvation, and it is the stirring of goodness and love in the soul of man that ultimately brings him to life.
Yes, it is the existence of man's own faith, hope, and benevolence and goodness that justifies our existence and makes man an indelible, conquering or vanquishing creature, for the flesh can never transcend the glimmer of humanity and reason?
Closing the book, I stopped my random thoughts.
The day broke vaguely,
Crime and Punishment II
Dostoevsky is one of the most important figures in Russian literature alongside Lev? Dostoevsky is one of the twin peaks of Russian literature alongside Lev Tolstoy. Lu Xun once said that he both admired and loved the writer one is Dante, two is Dostoevsky. Lev Tolstoy was the first to leave the country. Tolstoy ran away and died in the stationmaster's room at Asta Railway Station with only two books, Montaigne's Essays and Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. Dostoevsky's writings also featured prominently on the reading list of German philosophical giant Heidegger in his early college years. There is no doubt that these sages whom Dostoevsky y influenced have also y influenced all of humanity, leaving a rich intellectual legacy.
As a legal person, Dostoevsky's rich literary heritage, the most will pay attention to should be "Crime and Punishment". I initially saw the name of this work, is in junior high school reading "Chinese self-study" magazine, the feeling at the time is that the author's name is odd enough (because the previous has not been exposed to Russian surnames), but the title of the book presents a geometric symmetry. Seriously read this work, but after fifteen years of work.
Crime and Punishment, rather than a geometrically symmetrical structure, is a dramatic advance. Originally, life was like a play. Dostoevsky was once a champion of the abolition of serfdom in Russia, an own intellectual formally trained in Western science and imbued with Western culture, and persecuted by the Tsarist autocracy. But after his father was killed by the serfs, he became a devout follower of the Tsarist, Orthodox Church, a Pan-Slavist, but at the same time a fraternalist. The dual temperament of his character gives his writings, including Crime and Punishment, a more confrontational and dramatic quality.
Crime and Punishment III
Dostoevsky set Crime and Punishment in St. Petersburg, Russia, in the 1860s, a time when Peter the Great was hell-bent on leading Russia down the path of Western development. In such an era, there was a group of "60s people", typified by Luren in Crime and Punishment. They were devoted to the natural sciences and sought spiritual guidance in the limited rationality and wisdom of mankind, and even in art they believed that the value of art was to show the way forward in life. They believe in reasonable egoism, which is their dialectic. It was Chernyshevsky who developed their "rational egoism" to the extreme.
Lujan, in Crime and Punishment, once blurted out his dialectic of love: "Science tells us that if you love people, you must first love yourself, because everything in the world is based on personal interest. If you love only yourself, then you will put your affairs in order, and your set of coats will remain intact. The truth of economics adds that the more social and human endeavors are run, that is, the more so-called complete sets of coats, then the more the foundations of society are consolidated, and the more public ****ing endeavors are run in society. So when I personally get rich, I am also getting rich for everyone, thus making my friends and relatives get something more than a broken set of coats. This is no longer a private individual gift, but the result of a general prosperity of the community?"
In this era, Russian society was permeated by a thick fog of liberalism, nihilism and skepticism. In the midst of this thick fog, there are still the traditional habits of the Russian nation that emphasize harmony, mutual trust, and reliance on moral and collective spirituality. These two diametrically opposed spiritual qualities in a period of social transformation form the tone of the era of Crime and Punishment. St. Petersburg, on the other hand, is a specimen of Peter the Great's bent on learning from the West and striving for greatness; even the naming of the city is Western.
Peter the Great wanted the old Russia to clean up its act and become the "New Holland", and St. Petersburg, named after the Western style of naming, naturally became a window for Russia to accept new ideas from Europe, and naturally became the standard stage for Crime and Punishment, which needed to emphasize the dramatic, confrontational nature of the play.
Crime and Punishment IV
The most absorbing aspect of the book is Dostoevsky's psychological description of Raskolnikov before and after he breaks the law. Raskolnikov is an exemplary image of the existence of a dual personality: he is a kind-hearted, helpful poor college students, a sense of justice, but at the same time his temperament gloomy, withdrawn. When he meets a young woman in the park who is being harassed, he uses the little money he has left to pay for her transportation home. When Marmelatov was injured by a horse and cart, he took him home, and seeing that they could not even come up with the money for the funeral, he took out the money that his mother had just sent today and gave it to the orphaned and widowed members of their family. It is important to realize that that money was hard-earned, borrowed by Raskolnikov's mother from someone else using her pension as collateral, and that it was all he had. But at the same time he was an inscrutable man, gloomy and withdrawn he let poverty overwhelm him, he was in debt to his landlady and was afraid to meet with her or even to see anyone. Always like a cat from the stairs quietly from the front, sneaking away, so that no one see him. This young man's heart has accumulated so much resentment and anger, he despised all, so although he has a young man's unique love of decency psychology, sometimes very attentive to details, but dressed in these rags to go out, but trickle does not feel bad thoughts.
Dostoevsky is a famous Russian writer who criticized factualism. Crime and Punishment is one of his outstanding social philosophical novels. Like many contemporary Russian novels, the author in Crime and Punishment reflects various aspects of social life in Russia at that time and explores some social issues such as poverty and crime.
Crime and Punishment is a novel of social philosophy that has an irreplaceable place in the history of world literature. The novel focuses on the main character, Raskolnikov, who commits a crime and is punished by his conscience and morality after committing the crime, and shows Raskolnikov's contradictory inner world after he kills and kills the old woman who is a loan shark and the old woman's sister. When reading this book, always feel that you can not read on, but slowly will be invented, it is full of mystery, let a person feel depressed, want to shout out loud.
"Crime and Punishment" in the most written is the punishment, "crime" only just accounted for the first two chapters of the book, and "punishment" through the majority. It is not the physical punishment, but the moral punishment which is stricter than that. So the law is only one way of punishing crime, and the other is the condemnation of the human heart and soul. Sometimes the law does not make people realize that they have committed a crime, while the deep condemnation of the heart will make people more aware of the faults they have committed.
Early in the morning, Raskolnikov received a summons from the police, horrified, and then relieved to learn that it was for the payment of arrears. He was separated inadvertently into the ear of the police officer recited last night's murder,louboutin pas cher, the official Belle official shopping site, slowed down to fainting, causing a police officer to pay attention to. He woke up and returned home to bed, unconscious for a few days, and later improved, but the heart is in a more painful resistance to conflict. Raskolnikov killed a man, although he did not show any traces, but he was unable to relieve his inner cowardice, he felt that all the wonderful feelings he originally had were extinguished with it, which was a harsher punishment of conscience than the punishment of the law. He realized that his "experiment" had failed. He came to Sonia with a painful feeling and, inspired by Sonia's religious thoughts, revealed to her the true nature of his crime and his thoughts. On Sonia's advice, he turned himself in to the police. Raskolnikov was sentenced to eight years of hard labor and came to Siberia. Within a few days, Sonia arrived there as well. In the early hours of one morning, the two met by the river. They resolved to believe in God, to suffer all the suffering in a contrite state of mind, and to obtain a new life of energy.
The protagonist of the novel, Raskolnikov, is a poor college student living in a small room on the fifth floor of an apartment in the slums. He dropped out of school because he couldn't afford to pay his tuition, and kept his life together on the money that his mother and sister scrimped from their tight budget. He hadn't paid rent for a long time. The landlord's wife not only stopped feeding him, but also pressed him hard for rent. He experienced a bitter and violent thinking struggle - he has to determine whether he belongs to the extraordinary people who can do whatever they want, Jiuyang soybean milk machine which is good, or only worthy of being the extraordinary people's tools of the general people. "I was about to make up my mind what kind of an event ah, but fear some insignificant trifles!" These were Raskolnikov's exact words. He knew that it was exactly seven hundred and thirty paces from the gate of that house, and had once counted them in his walk. Once more he had gone to the big house to pawn a flat old silver watch of his father's to the usurer, and he had scrutinized the usurer's habits, and the furnishings of the room, and he was making preparations for that, for that which had not yet been resolved. He was unable to express his impulses and disquietude either in words or in feelings, and at a time when he felt oppressed and disquieted in a most disagreeable manner he met Marmelatov, a minor civil servant. Marmeladov is desperate because of unemployment, and his eldest daughter Sonia is forced to work as a street prostitute. Raskolnikov did not want to be like Marmeladov to be slaughtered, he finally made up his mind to plan to use the "test" to confirm that he is a very "unusual person", drunkenness free hangout. On the next day, he learned that the usury old woman's sister 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. is not at home, he knew the opportunity to come, the same day he pretended to pawn the name of the old woman's house and came to print money, with an axe to cut her to death, but also to take all of her money, and at this time the old woman's sister went out to return to the Raskolnikov in the chaos and killed her, and he fled to put the goods are placed under a rock. He escaped and put all the goods under a rock. Confused and returned to the residence.
Nominally it seems that Raskolnikov was presented as a rescuer in the home of Marmeladov, he was first to the injured Marmeladov escorted home; after his death and funding to sponsor the deployment of the funeral of his widows and orphans; in Sonia was rescued and helped to clear his name. Katerina even regarded him as the family's backer and savior, counting on him to assist her to start a girls' boarding school, so as to completely get rid of the poor and miserable luck. In reality, the Marmeladovs were Raskolnikov's rescuers. When Raskolnikov rescue seriously injured Marmeladov, before the pain of the mind but because of a compassion and rescue and a whole new feeling, the heart occurs a sense of life and a sense of strength, that his life did not die with that old woman. And Sonia is the "Madonna" who saved his life.
The names of the characters in Russian novels are kinda long, so the following male lead will be referred to simply as Lass.
The book is simply about Lass, who kills two people, and whose "superhuman theory" suggests that there is nothing wrong with his behavior. After experiencing a lot of things, his mind changed, and decided to turn himself in, to be a new man, and finally was sent to Siberia to receive the story of rehabilitation.
The novel does not reflect the net of heaven, only full of desperate main theme.
"Crime and Punishment" read six
Just before finishing reading Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, both of whom can be called one of the four heavenly kings of fiction.
Compared to Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, Crime and Punishment is very good reading, Crime and Punishment reads like a tight plot, ups and downs of the detective story, and Tolstoy's Anna Karenina is really half a day to turn over a page of paper, and often an ordinary scene of the description of the Dream of the Red Chamber of Commerce details like a tedious sense of tediousness, inside the legend of the main characters of 150, and first name plus last name is very long, it seems to be a very good idea. And the name plus the surname is very long, it seems not to drown the readers do not stop feeling. But after reading it, the real picture is very shocking and gives people a deep thought. Because of the crime and punishment inside the hero has like a split personality like dual personality, naturally, the criminal's psychology and human nature description is also more, in general, Dostoevsky's language skills than Tolstoy to be solid.
Both of the **** the same point I think is to put the story in the first place, did not consider too much language problems. Just also read Maugham's description of these two writers: ? People always make a fuss about writing sub-styles, we want to write even better, we try to write simply, clearly, concisely, we strive for balance in our sentences, for rhythm. Read them aloud to see if they sound good. Yet the fact is that four of the greatest novelists of all time, Balzac, Dickens, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, wrote without caring about language at all, and it turns out that if you can tell a story, create characters, devise a plot, and if you're sincere and passionate, it doesn't matter at all how your language is.? Of course, I think Maugham is also a writer who puts story ahead of verbal form, but at the same time his language is so concise and vivid that it's endearing.
There's as much religion in there as in Anna Karenina, and the themes of humanity and redemption are a change of pace. But Crime and Punishment is more focused on exploring one's soul. The protagonist, Raskolnikov, has a bit of a split personality; he's a very good person at heart, but his behavior comes through in a way that sometimes makes it seem like his body is occupied by demons. His kindness is reflected in the fact that he is obviously very poor, but he can go to the aid of the widow Katerina, and he will also try to put out a fire and burn himself to save a small life. So much so that his killing of the debtor old woman, who often squeezed money from the poor, his sister, who was so poor that she had to sacrifice her freedom to marry the heartless Petrovich, and his mother, who had to sell her iron in order for him to finish his studies, was so sick and delirious that he took an axe and chopped up the old woman, the old woman's wife, and her mother's son. the old lady, whose innocent sister chanced upon the scene, and was also hacked to death by him, after the killing. He thought he could get a lot of money, but the old lady only a lot of precious jewelry and jewels, he snatched and did not dare to take it for money, had to hide under a rock, and then the next has been living in fear in the days. The story has him and the police Porfiriat battle of wits, as well as the onset of his fall into a nightmare in a variety of bizarre worlds, kind friend Razumihin how to take care of the sick him, but also around the same as his poor class of stories (meet the poor have to prostitution of prostitutes Sofia, to help her and fell in love with her), and finally, in the friends and relatives to instill a number of religious dogma, the non-believers of the protagonist still goes to turn himself in for final peace and redemption.
First of all, I marveled at the fact that the choice between evil and good is really a choice between one thought and another, rather than a person's inherent and eternal nature. The hero in the ordinary people seem to be very good and noble, so much so that even the police officer Porfiriat in the face of some very obvious pointing to the murderer is the hero clues, he felt that his own problem, is his own suspicion of the wrong, so in the end, even if he already knew that the hero is a murderer, he also just persuade him to turn himself in, because he is from the bottom of his heart to think that the hero is a very good and upright man. In fact, the reality of many perverted murder cases inside a lot of in friends and family seem to be honest and simple people, never do this thing people. So, perhaps, goodness can not be maintained in a more continuous state, not as we understand it, good people can not occasionally make a in the ordinary people seem very ? evil? thing. And what if one accidentally breaks through that line? Is it necessary to negate all previous goodness? So that's probably why there are people outside of the law to judge, and there's humanism in that.
The suffering of the human race is so great that the author offers two ways to benefit humanity: 1. to transform society, and 2. to perfect oneself. The protagonist, Raskolnikov, hates the wide gap between the rich and the poor in society, detests social injustice, and is determined to transform society himself. He published a set of theories in a magazine when he was young. In his opinion, history is created by two types of people, one is superhuman, who establish a new a new order of the society through bloodshed, and let the other type of people in the society, the common people, to comply with it, and the obligation of the common people is to comply with the norms. For example, Napoleon in history belonged to the category of ? Superman? , who founded a new nation on a blood-soaked land, and whose achievements are undoubtedly celebrated and appreciated by future generations, although perhaps he had the blood of countless innocent people on his hands. The protagonist, Raskolnikov, feels that he too belongs to a superman like Napoleon, and he feels obliged to break through the boundaries of conventional social morality to establish a more harmonious society.
However, the cost of breaking through the constraints imposed by society is heavy, in fact, a person in the social norms of morality can do a lot of things, personal development of a lot of space, if at the beginning of the Raskolnikov can start from the beginning of their own transformation, rather than go to transform the society, perhaps he wanted to start from their own shortcomings may have a better outcome.
The evil of the protagonist Raskolnikov is not the evil of the nature like the common people, he is the evil of the thought, he does evil first of all in the spirit of a good wish, but the author would like to tell us is that, whether out of the purpose of good or evil, can not go to do evil, because in the book, we can see: the protagonist, although by the set of their own self-considered reasonable for the good of the code to do evil, did not receive any little conscience condemnation, but later on, we can see: the protagonist by the self-considered reasonable for the good code to do evil, did not receive any little conscience condemnation. any bit of conscience, but the punishment that follows undoubtedly exists. The people who love him keep torment from time to time, and there are innocent people as his scapegoats, and he ends up in prison leading to the death of his mother. It clearly pays to set off a series of evils in order to create good.
The protagonist's final journey back to real life from indulging in fantasy is his final redemption. He goes from ? transforming society? toward? to self-improvement?
I would give this book an 80 out of 10, and have nothing to lose by not reading it.
Crime and Punishment VII
When it comes to the masterpieces of world literature, you have to mention Lev? Tolstoy, talking about Tolstoy, had to mention with him in the same generation when the same Russian Dostoevsky, and talking about Dostoevsky, had to mention the classmates began to become drowsy look?
I think that our fear of the "world's great books", which has been caused by passive reading for so long, has somehow misled us. Cervantes, Dickens, Stendhal, Balzac? These names are always hard to look up to. However, Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment is different. Referring to this work, the famous writer Ge Fei said that even if Crime and Punishment is put together with other bestsellers, it can be a suspenseful novel without compromise. If we exclude the sentimental coloring as mentioned above and the unaccustomedness to the Russian awkward names, and revisit this novel, we will find the unique charm it has.
The plot of Crime and Punishment is very tightly organized, and the suspense is very well set up. Take the beginning, "In early July, when the weather was particularly hot, in the evening, a young man walked out of the bucket room he had rented from the second landlord in C Hutong, onto the street, and then slowly, as if hesitantly, headed over to K Bridge. Time, characters, and then the event, no large description of the scenery, nor write the "young man" clothing, only that he "as if hesitant", that is to say, he has something on his mind, what is it? The author is not in a hurry to break it down, and slowly begins to convey all kinds of information about this young man, and only in the third paragraph does he say that he has decided to do one thing, a very important plan that makes him feel fearful when he thinks about it, and what is that plan? The author stops there again and just says something about him going to mortgage something. Having whetted our appetites, the author turns to his encounter with the drunkard and the letter from home, leading to two other important clues. It is not until our patience wears thin that the author finally says that he is going to kill someone! So we are immediately energized to see how a college student (i.e. Raskolnikov, the protagonist) with a not-so-bad character can kill someone and whether he can do it successfully or not. This is how we follow the author's footsteps into the novel, attracted by the plot itself, and thus read such a "world famous book".
Of course, Crime and Punishment wouldn't be great if the plot alone were compelling. Crime and Punishment shows an unprecedented evaluation of the behavior of the characters in the novel, and his evaluation of the characters: there is no evaluation. For the main character, Raskolnikov, the author concentrates on him all kinds of characters at the same time: pitiful, righteous, ferocious, and weak, and from the beginning to the end, he makes no judgment on whether he is right or wrong. This is different from the novels we usually read that are full of confrontations between good and evil, different from satire, and different from glorification. If we think a little bit about life, we will find that its true nature is so, we are almost impossible to any one of the characters around us to make the judgment of its is precisely evil (if you are fair enough), that is to say, such a novel is no longer to indoctrinate us, but to respond to the most real state of our lives, and then take us together to think, some things in life, is right or wrong, is good or bad. And then it takes us along to think about whether certain things in life are right or wrong, whether they are good or bad. Eventually we will realize that things in life are always so complicated that it is hard to say what is right and wrong. Realizing this means that we grow.