Square dance occupies the road

Why is the land fee at the end of the square self-management activity considered by the urban management as occupying the road? According to relevant reports, it is because the square was officially handled by the landlord. There were corresponding punishments when the urban management passed by, but the punishment was too strong and the sky-high toll was charged. So I met people's dissatisfaction, and this incident also triggered public opinion. So, in the final analysis, is the land fee for the square's self-management activities ended by urban management a manifestation of occupying the road? I think it depends on the amount of departure. For the corresponding penalty amount, it shows different penalties in the side. Therefore, we can judge whether it is the performance of occupying the road according to the punishment.

If the urban management charges a sky-high site occupation fee, that is to say, the urban management uses its own authority to charge a lot of site occupation fees. It is against professional ethics to use one's authority to make huge profits. Therefore, if the site fee charged is high enough, it means that the urban management is occupying the road. Urban management is a public official in urban management. Should be adhering to the goal of improving the city appearance and city appearance. Instead of using their own authority to seek some benefits. Urban management is also a kind of police, and the police have always been a lofty profession in people's minds. Therefore, the urban management will only think that he is abusing his power, not maintaining social stability.

If the site occupation fee charged by urban management is slightly higher than the general handling fee, it will be slightly higher. Then it is actually acceptable, because the organizers privately occupy public resources for their own affairs, which leads to an illegal phenomenon. This is not conducive to the stable development of society. Therefore, the fees charged by urban management are higher than those charged for reasons, which can warn people not to violate relevant laws and regulations.

Both urban management and event organizers should measure the amount accordingly. Only in this way can we know whether the urban management has the idea of occupying the road. But for many organizers, we have to criticize that the organizers occupy public resources privately for their own private activities.