Reflections on reading ted English speeches

Gee, even Yang Lan can't be approved these days? ! ╮(╯▽╰)╭ 1. Oral English level and speech level cannot be equated. It is an indisputable fact that the topic of this speech is too big and the structure is loose. There are many speakers with strong accents on TED, and there are many people whose content is better than this. What's more, judging from this incident, Yang Lan's English, at least her spoken English, is not very good. 2. To evaluate the quality of a dish, I don't need to know how to cook, and I don't need to know how to refrigerate it to say that a refrigerator is rotten, so I don't need to go beyond Yang Lan to evaluate her speech. Please clarify the basic logical relationship. ++++++1is not a criticism. Do you have any basis for saying that this speech is big and empty and loosely structured? I only listened to it once, but I think what she said is very good. She took Aunt Susan in China as an example. Isn't that interesting? Then she talked about her perplexity in applying for graduation, what children in China think now, their present situation, their difficulties, and finally the hope of China. Is this structure still loose? Tell me, why don't you part! It took her more than ten minutes to talk about all the hot spots in China. Hang in there! You said you can't judge if you can't cook, no! It's that you should put forward pertinent opinions after criticism. You can't just say it's not delicious! You can say it's too salty or too light or too oily. You have to have a reason. If this means that it is not delicious, you are not qualified to comment, because you are not a professional. When criticizing others, you should look at whether you have capital or not. Is it interesting to follow suit? You said that Yang Lan's spoken English is not very good. Do you know what spoken English is? When Yang Lan spoke about Kan Kan, the words were in place, the words were easy to understand, and the accent was pure, which was already very good.