Guangdong zuihuo square dance daquan

I think that men smashing stereos not only damages other people's finances, but also does no good to themselves. He could have had other better ways to communicate with these aunts, but he chose the most irrational one. This practice is not worth advocating and learning. We still have to use civilized means to safeguard our own interests.

Recently, a news has caused a lot of hot discussion among netizens. It turned out that in Guangdong, a man thought his aunt's square dance was a nuisance. After several unsuccessful communications, he smashed the stereo used in the square dance. Different people have different opinions about this matter. Some netizens also expressed their support because they felt that the aunt's square dance really had a great influence on others. Some netizens also think that this man's practice is extremely extreme, but it is not a good way to deal with it. Personally, I feel that this person's practice is not desirable, smashing other people's stereos and harming other people's interests. What you explicitly point to will become unreasonable. Therefore, this man is still impulsive.

In fact, men smashing stereos not only damages other people's finances, but also has a bad influence. Although it is not good for aunt to dance square dance to disturb the people, this man can ask the police for help. It is a very childish behavior to stop others' behavior with violent actions. After this list smashed the stereo, in fact, not only did it not solve this problem well, but it worsened the relationship and pushed the communication to a deadlock. Therefore, I think this man's behavior is very impulsive and immature.

To sum up, I think it is very irrational for a Guangdong man to smash his aunt's stereo because he thinks that her square dance is disturbing the people. Secondly, he has caused financial damage to others, and he needs to compensate himself. It can be said that he lost his wife and lost his soldiers, which is not worth learning from. It should be used as a negative textbook.