How to write a task-driven composition

How to write a task-driven composition: first, learn to examine the topic of the composition, and then make a decision according to your own judgment; According to your idea, extract a few keywords; For composition, content is the main body; Finally, make a summary.

Task-driven writing steps and methods 1. Clarify the writing requirements and tasks.

When writing a composition with task-driven materials, candidates should read the materials carefully, read the topic requirements carefully and complete the writing task.

Second, grasp the core facts of the materials and clarify right and wrong.

Third, choose a good angle and establish a point of view around right and wrong.

Fourth, reason on the basis of materials.

In short, task-driven composition is not a tiger in the mountains, so there is nothing to be afraid of. It also has corresponding rules to follow. As long as students' thinking and writing methods are clear and let them practice constantly, they can write task-driven material compositions well.

The characteristic of task-driven composition is to give a discussion question for you to weigh. Materials are generally composed of three items, there is no right or wrong, but we should distinguish between good and bad. We call it "high-low contrast" for short.

Because the materials of this composition are not right or wrong, only high and low, and clearly require us to "weigh" and "choose", we must reflect the balance in our thinking, that is, contrast, distinguish between high and low in comparison, clarify our own views and solve problems.

How to write the overall framework: introduction, discussion, connection and conclusion (asking questions-analyzing problems-solving problems)

Intermediate subject: discuss (analyze the problem) and clearly explain the reasons (advantages/disadvantages) for or against it; Say antonyms.

Mode of thinking (namely "argument angle and method"): causal analysis, hypothesis analysis, result analysis, background analysis, dialectical thinking, comparative analysis and concession thinking;

Material composition: based on the original material, similar famous sayings, celebrities, real events and phenomena in life can be linked by analogy.

Argumentation and analysis angles: man and himself, man and others, man and society (country), man and nature, man and traditional history, etc.