Square dance video of amnesia in the song

In fact, for us, there is no absolute fairness in the world, and because of this, the law can only be relatively fair. Therefore, after a person's complete amnesia, if he is not responsible for the previous crimes, it will inevitably have an impact on others. If he is not severely punished by the law, it will definitely lead to the ineffectiveness of the law. So in a sense, there is unfairness, but in a sense, unfairness does have its special reasons, so any local change will lead to earth-shaking changes in the results, so even if you have amnesia, you should be responsible for your actions to avoid unnecessary losses and injuries to society, so you can think about the problem from the following aspects.

1, for us, a person with complete amnesia is also responsible for his previous actions, and the law can be relatively fair, so in a sense, it is inevitable to take responsibility. In fact, for a natural person, it is true that he can't understand his previous crimes, and he will feel wronged when he takes responsibility. This can only be that the law is relatively fair. Therefore, in a sense, taking responsibility for one's previous crimes can better safeguard the fairness and justice of the law, and for a natural person, even if frustrated, he should take responsibility for his own crimes.

2. The change of any local thing will lead to the change of the trajectory of things. It is precisely because of this that if a person suffers from amnesia and does not need to be responsible for the previous crimes, the law will also be ineffective. In fact, I have to say that from a philosophical point of view, local changes will also lead to overall changes. Because of this, if a person does not need to take responsibility for the previous crimes after complete amnesia, the law will also be ineffective. Therefore, the law connives at these things, which really infringes on the rights and interests of others and is not conducive to social stability and development.

Even if a person has complete amnesia, it doesn't mean that he has never done anything before. It is because of this amnesia that he should pay for his actions, even though he is innocent. In fact, it is undeniable that if a person really loses his memory completely, he naturally doesn't know what he has done before, and he can't judge whether he has committed similar crimes before and whether he needs to bear the responsibility. For the law, there is no way to achieve absolute fairness, so relative fairness can better safeguard the rights and interests of most people. Therefore, after a person completely loses his memory, he has to pay the price for his previous behavior. From the perspective of social development, there are bound to be some unreasonable phenomena, but these are not.

In fact, we have to say that if a person loses his memory completely, he has to pay for his actions, which can better reflect the fairness and justice of the law for us. If a person does not pay for the crime after amnesia, it will also lead to infringement of the rights of others and make the law ineffective.