In fact, if these hard-working professionals are strong enough, they will naturally be unstoppable; Or seek your own "camp" and rely on it.
However, after all, the workplace can be promoted not by party struggle, but by its own strength. Don't let these last-rate struggles affect the long-term future of the workplace.
First, the self-improvement and intrigue in the office is indeed the reality of the workplace, and I believe many people in the workplace also have a deep understanding. However, if the professionals themselves are strong enough, no one can hurt anyone and even be flattered by others. "The strong are the most respected" is the eternal truth in the workplace.
I came to my present company as an external job-hopping, and my resume is quite good. Soon after I arrived at the office, I found that all the employees here were holding a group. They tried to win over, more in the form of "holding their thighs", but I hinted that I had no intention of participating in their struggle.
I firmly believe that only by "keeping abreast of the world" can we keep abreast of the world. When they are tired of internal struggle, the only person who is detached from it, not the biggest winner, will also benefit from it.
Many professionals will weave a "personal network" in the workplace, and I am no exception, but the so-called "personal network" is by no means a "circle" that restricts your development.
It is a good thing that these "circles" can bring information and resources to members, but many of them are derived from multiple camps, which do more harm than good. At that time, some professionals envied me, but what I envied was not charm, but strength. Without certain strength, I will only be an unsociable little person in their eyes, and I will be crushed by their mutual attacks and roommates.
After realizing that my strength is the most reliable, I naturally dare not slack off and continue to improve myself on the periphery of the "circle" to create a "personal network" that is really beneficial to me.
Second, I joined the camp and came to the enterprise almost at the same time, and there was a colleague who was a newcomer to the workplace on call. This colleague is quite self-aware and understands that personal strength is limited after all, so he chose to join one of the camps, and soon confirmed his "edge" and merged into his "circle"
After joining this camp, this colleague has a sense of belonging, and even when eating in the canteen, he can make a table with his own people. Joining the camp may save a lot of trouble. If you are not so confident about your ability, you can naturally choose to join the camp. It's nothing to be ashamed of, it's just a strategy taken in a bad environment.
If you manage it well, you can also become the "uncrowned king" who has the right to speak among employees. If not, you will get a relatively good working atmosphere and colleague relationship.
According to Professor Zhai Dongsheng, India, a big country in South Asia, tried to swing between the United States and the Soviet Union in order to get the greatest benefit from its own country after independence, but the fact did not develop like this.
The "fence sitter" will eventually be hard to please on both sides. This truth has existed since ancient times, but my colleagues have chosen to repeat it. Since joining this camp, he has not been very quiet, and then he has the meaning of "rebellion", and the other camp naturally accepts it.
However, he soon began to renege and seemed to want to jump back to his old base camp. At this time, the two "circles" showed little interest in him and simply began to isolate him. In such a workplace environment, being isolated is undoubtedly being abandoned by the workplace. As his existence became more and more marginalized, he also felt that this was not the way, and finally chose to leave this enterprise.
Third, focusing on your own workplace is not a stage for party struggle, but a workplace. In fact, this "circle" culture will not help professionals, but will only make professionals constantly consume their energy and have no time for self-improvement and continuous progress.
I am "free" from their camp because I don't want to get involved in these struggles, but I hope I can concentrate on my work. "Fighting" may always be full of satisfaction, and competition helps both sides grow, but after the "fighting", in fact, both sides lose.
Like my colleagues, there are not a few people who are "persuaded out" by infighting in the workplace, but most of them are professionals who have wasted their good years in the "circle" confrontation. If possible, don't go deep into the intrigue workplace, which is in your best interest.
In such a workplace environment, once you go astray in the workplace, it is difficult to turn back. If professionals don't "dabble" at first, it will be difficult to get away with it in the infighting.
There are too many problems left over from the past, which will continue to haunt you. Even if you deliberately fade out of the vortex center of the "circle" struggle, you will often continue to be trapped in it. Focusing on one's own work is the foundation of seeking a breakthrough. Professionals who are not good at "fighting" should not fight hard, choose the above methods and make their own choices wisely. If you don't get hurt by intrigue and go deep into such a struggle, then your career future will not be affected by it and you will continue to move in the right direction.
It is said that where there are people, there are rivers and lakes, and all kinds of intrigue in the workplace can exhaust an art of war.
In order to defend myself and strengthen myself, I chose to join the camp and seek political power for the party, but I must not indulge in it. Otherwise, if you lose yourself, you will be trapped in endless troubles forever. Only by improving the competitiveness of the workplace can we have a bright future.