I don't think it's reasonable.
What about this question, there is a key verb - occupy. This is a pejorative word meaning to occupy and use. To occupy is to take for one's own use, and here it means to use coercive means and measures to take a public ****ing place for one's own use. Obviously it is inappropriate.
The example of the amazons "drive" the children's practice is also very unreasonable. The square is a public **** place, all the citizens, whether it is the elderly or children or dancing big sister, can be used and play in this entertainment, belong to a first-come-first-served use of the problem, rather than occupying, forcing others to "let" to their own use. This kind of mandatory occupation of public **** place behavior I think is unreasonable behavior.
I am a garden management department, our jurisdiction includes urban parks, squares and other public **** place. So I often come across people who occupy the green space in the parks to dance in the square. There is no such thing as occupying a plaza; there is using a plaza. But occupying a park green space is also the behavior of occupying a public **** place, and this kind of occupying a park green space is even worse.
One is that it will destroy the park green space green. Because our parks are open parks, many citizens like the environment here. However, at night under the brilliant lights, some citizens take up the wide lawn for square dancing. What is more, they hang a curtain on two trees as a screen and cast a screen to dance. However, the grass and greenery are fragile ah, which can withstand the public in their head jumping toss ah.
The second is to affect the public recreation . Our unit often receive complaints from the public, said where the park lawn where some people occupy the lawn square dance, sometimes they are coaxed away. There were originally playing cards next to the lawn to play well, they dance next to the sound open to the sky, obviously intentional. What's more, they use the cordon to encircle the area for camping. This makes it impossible for other citizens to use the park's green space for rest and recreation.
Like the example and the above destruction of public **** green, affecting the normal recreation of the public occupation of public **** place behavior are unreasonable behavior, not only unpopular, but also greatly increase the work of our public officials.
I think that the public **** places are available to the general public friends, rather than being occupied by some people for personal reasons. In case of necessity, the use of the process can be friendly negotiation, rather than the use of immoral and unreasonable ways to force others to make concessions. For example, square dancing friends need to use the public **** place, you can choose no one or less people in the open area, the surrounding did not gather or set of citizens, at the same time, the music control in the decibel does not disturb others. In this way, you can dance fitness, other people can also use the public **** place to rest and recreation, so ten perfect, why not?