Debate the fourth grade composition 1 A heated debate broke out and was introduced to everyone's ears. It turns out that Class One, Grade Five is having a debate! I saw the pros and cons divided into two groups, each with a serious expression.
The debate revolves around whether it is beneficial to open books. It is beneficial to support affirmation and beneficial to oppose negation. I support the benefits and affirmation of opening this book.
The debate began. First of all, we made a positive speech: "Read more books and read good books. Reading can also learn some knowledge that we haven't learned in class, so reading is good for us, and opening books is good. "
After listening to our words, the other party seemed to have a well-thought-out plan and stood up to refute us: "In our opinion, it may not be good to open the book. Because, after some books are read, they will embark on the road of crime. So opening a book may not be beneficial. "
At this time, I stood up and refuted them: "Laozi, an ancient philosopher in China, once said that everything has two sides. If you know those books are bad, why do you want to read them? " If that book is ugly and full of typos, no one will read it "I sat down proudly and looked at each other's changes.
In this way, the debate suddenly became fierce and it was difficult to tell the winner.
Finally, Miss Wang said, "You are both well prepared. Reading, you should read more books, read good books, be good at drawing the essence from books and turn the essence of books into your own knowledge. This will help to open the book. "
This is really a wonderful and intense debate!
On Wednesday afternoon, in the second class, we held a debate in the classroom. The theme is that opening books is beneficial, but not necessarily beneficial.
Opening books is beneficial to the positive, but not necessarily to the negative. The main debaters of the square are Li Shenyu, She, Yin Yifan, Liu Yijun and Qiu Jingjing. The main debaters of the opposing side are Zhang Aosen, Du Zerong, Yang Jiarun, Cai Huixuan and Lin.
At the beginning of the debate, Li Shenyu of Zheng Fang said, "Books are the nourishment of the whole world. We are now a seedling waiting to absorb nutrition. Only by reading and enriching extracurricular knowledge can we absorb nutrition and grow into a towering tree. Therefore, we think it is beneficial to open the book. "
Zhang Aosen, an opponent, can't wait to stand up and say, "Reading can certainly enrich people's knowledge, but opening books is beneficial, only under beneficial conditions, not just any books." Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty said:' Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools.' Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: first, it is a good medicine, and medicine can cure diseases. First, poison can kill people. Therefore, we think that opening books may not be beneficial. "
The pros and cons are red-faced, and no one will let anyone. The students in the audience also listened with relish.
Finally, the teacher concluded: "A good book is not as good as a treasure, and a bad book is not as good as a robber." Therefore, it is beneficial to choose a good book to read. Judging from the performance of the players, opening books may not be conducive to victory! "
This debate, although the positive debate lost. But how wonderful this debate is!
It is often said that "opening books is beneficial", but after careful scrutiny, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.
"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do." This famous saying is that anyone who reads any book can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things. In real life, many teenagers have embarked on a dark road and fallen into the abyss of pain just because they read those unhealthy books. At this time, if you don't pull back from the brink, you will only get him/her deeper and deeper. Reading is certainly a good thing, but you should choose the kind of books you read, and don't read those books that are harmful to your body and mind. This will not only be useless, but also ruin your future. Books are the ladder of human progress and the source of human wisdom. Yes, I really don't object, but students' books are more and more divided into many categories, and everyone has their own interests, just as I don't care what kind of books you read. However, what are the benefits of reading those meaningless books? If you read those unhealthy books, your pure heart will become dirty. Everything I have just said is our view that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial" Opening books is not necessarily beneficial.
Opening books is beneficial, as the name implies: opening books is beneficial and will bring benefits to yourself. Reading, it will let you know about distant things around you, the world, the planet, the universe, human beings, history, nature and everything related to human beings.
Fourth grade debate composition 4 Yes, we held another debate in Class 7. This argument can be said to be tit for tat! Each group showed their magical powers and repeated the war of words and Confucianism for everyone!
Because today is the debate, everyone has mixed feelings. And I, because I am well prepared, don't feel too nervous, and I am still a little excited!
After repeated prayers, we were finally attracted to our group after the second round. We were "flattered" and arrived at the podium under the gaze of the whole class.
Facing the meaningful eyes of 30 people, my hands were wet, my legs trembled slightly, and I suddenly felt thirsty. Sweat broke out on my head and I slipped down. As I am a debater, I will speak first. Slightly dazed, my mind went blank, and I opened my mouth. I was surprised to find that I stuttered! No matter how well the manuscript is written, stuttering is also a big problem! No way, I had to force myself to speak and say a lot at random. After the speech, I went back to the "preparation area" in disappointment, sorted out my arguments and tried not to make the same mistake again.
After reaching the conclusion, my heart is dying. I turned my back on my partner and waited for the result of the vote with a "certain death" mentality. But life is always unexpected, and we actually won!
Life is like this. In desperation, the big reversal made the parties and onlookers speechless. I think I can do better in this debate. Looking forward to the next debate!
Fourth grade debate composition 5 This afternoon, our class had a heated debate with the theme "Is it beneficial to open books?" .
Ding Lingling, the bell is ringing. The teacher said, "I declare the debate now!" " "Then the teacher called 10 students to debate, with one side positive and the other negative. The representative of the square said, "I think it is beneficial to open books." "The ancients often said, read thousands of books, Wan Li road. Knowledge is priceless. Only by reading can we increase our knowledge and broaden our horizons. Books are the ladder of human progress, which means that opening books is beneficial. " I thought to myself: How strong a professional player is, his opponent will definitely lose. The other representative said, "I can't agree with you. Isn't there a rotten book? " Reading those bad books will not only make us lose benefits, but also learn to do bad things. The positive representative said, "The ancients taught people to read more books. Reading makes people increase their knowledge, gain experience and bring happiness, which is the ladder of human progress. The ancients often said: study hard, study hard, study hard. Throughout the ages, people who have done great things have read widely. Reading more books means making more friends, which can improve and enrich yourself, so I think it is beneficial to open books. "
This debate has improved my understanding of reading: nothing is perfect, and so is reading. We still have to study selectively to keep those "poisonous weeds" away from us.
In the afternoon, the students in our class had a heated debate on the topic of "can primary school students travel together?" .
The teacher asked us to raise our hands to choose Party A and Party B. The teacher said, "Those who agree to let primary school students travel together raise their hands." As soon as the voice fell, two-thirds of the people raised their hands, and then five representatives were elected to debate on the stage. The teacher added, "Please raise your hand if you don't agree to let primary school students travel together." After that, only a few people raised their hands, and five representatives were elected to the stage for debate. Party A said, "We feel that primary school students can travel together and many people can go out together, so we can unite. If they meet bad people, they can deal with them together. " Party B said, "What if you are a group of bad guys?" Not to be outdone, Party A said, "If it is a group of bad guys, we can put' SOS' distress signals on the ground or shout for help." Party B argued: "You have been caught by the bad guys, and it is impossible to put' SOS' on the ground again. Even if you do, others won't understand what this means. It is impossible to call for help, because the bad guys must have taken precautions. Besides, if you shout it out, but there is no one around ... "Time passed, and the result still didn't get through. But through this debate, I still think it is best for primary school students not to.
Today, we had a wonderful debate in class 6 1, and everyone was debating whether to tell the truth or a white lie.
At first, Zheng Fang (honesty) spoke on behalf of Jiang Tingting: "A lie is a lie, and there is no distinction between good and evil. The code of daily behavior of primary school students says: one should be honest and not lie. "I object!" It turned out to be Wu Fangyan's speech from the opposing side (white lies): white lies come from sincerity. If white lies are harmful to us, then why write white lies in the text? Because white lies can bring happiness, beauty, achievement and courage to live. Can you tell a critically ill patient the truth? That will only make him lose the courage to live. "The opposition thought that the square had nothing to say, but it attacked more violently.
"I will tell him the truth. If the patient knows the truth afterwards, isn't it more cruel to him? " The other party replied. If this is a white lie, I'd rather accept it. This is just your personal opinion, not the public opinion. "So I always said, finally tied.
In my opinion, in life, we need both honesty and white lies.
On the evening of the 8 th, the Mike family fell asleep and there was a quarrel in the kitchen. It turns out that meat and vegetables are having a debate!
Niu Ge threw his head back and said, "Young Master ate me and became very strong, so I am a good friend at the human table!" " "
Lettuce is not to be outdone: "Young Master is strong not only because of me, but also because I provided him with vitamins and other nutrients. If it weren't for me, how could the young master's resistance be so good! "
Brother meatball waddled over and said, "Little Master loves me the most! He can't eat without me! I tell you, he is an athlete in the class, and this is all my credit! "
Sister bean sprout twisted her waist and looked at her brother with disdain and said, "If young master only deals with you every day, wouldn't he become a big fat man?" He should make more friends with us! "
At this time, grandpa rice ball came, and everyone was quiet. Grandpa rice ball looked at the meat and vegetables and said kindly, "Sister Bean Sprouts has some truth. People should eat more vegetables. But it is not enough to eat only vegetables, and meat is also needed to provide nutrition for people. If you want to be strong and healthy, you can't be picky about food, and you can be healthy with balanced nutrition! "
After listening to grandpa's words, both the food and the meat blushed. They nodded, held hands and said in unison, "Only when we unite can we help the young master grow up healthily!"
Fourth grade debate composition 9 In today's composition class, we had a debate on "How good or how little homework is for primary school students".
The debate is about to begin, and everyone is preparing the content of the debate. The positive view is how good the homework is, while we hold the opposite view. First of all, Li Gang made a speech: "Do more homework and put more books and notebooks in your schoolbag, so that you can exercise." Our little red retorted, "Less homework is better. You can go out to play after finishing your homework. " Li Gang also retorted: "Going out to play will destroy the environment." At this time, it was my turn to speak: "The less homework, the more spare time." We can check and fill in the gaps and improve the quality of learning; Two: we can have time to exercise and strengthen our physique; Three: We can help mom and dad do housework and do our part. "Because of my speech, we won the first game.
In the second game, the pros and cons spoke more actively and the scene was very warm. Because it is the first time to hold a debate, the students are inexperienced and the materials prepared are not comprehensive, so the debate will go off topic as soon as it starts. In the end, we will not be able to tell the difference.
Then the teacher stepped forward to stop everyone from talking. The teacher smiled and said, "The students' speeches are all very good. However, the teacher thinks that whether there is less homework or more homework, we must first have a correct learning attitude and good study habits. With these two points, less and less homework will not be an obstacle to your study. "
The debate ended in the teacher's victory.
Today, our class held the first debate in history. The content of the debate is: whether it is beneficial or not to open books.
I agree, and I think it is beneficial to open books. Because the ancient poet Du Fu said: "Reading is like breaking ten thousand volumes, and writing is like being a god." This is undeniable. Du Fu has read countless books. Gradually, he memorized all the knowledge in books in his mind. He wrote articles and poems, a string of good words and sentences flowed down the river, and one excellent poem after another was passed down through the ages.
The next debate became more and more lively, and members began to debate. However, our positive member is one step behind, which gives the opposing side a preemptive opportunity. Members of the opposition party who were very active in the debate scrambled to stand up and debate. However, we are not very active in affirming, and we can only force one person to stand up and debate. I'm depressed. I don't think the affirmative can win.
The opposing party has made the disadvantages of reading very substantial. The opponent thinks that reading crayon Shinchan or some bad comic books by our primary school students will affect our physical and mental health. Some primary school students like to read novels such as martial arts romance, and sometimes they forget to eat and sleep. If they have no intention to study, their grades will plummet. So reading is not necessarily good.
In fact, in my opinion, reading has both advantages and disadvantages. When we choose books, we can choose some literary stories instead of those useless books. Read more books and read good books.
Debate composition 1 1 Today, our class held a debate. The themes of this debate are "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". People who think that "opening books is beneficial" are positive; It is the opponent who thinks that "opening books may not be beneficial"
At the beginning of the debate, Sharla Cheung said positively and confidently, "I agree that it is beneficial to open books, because those writers are not born writers, so they can write good compositions. It's that after reading a lot of books, they learn a lot of writing methods before they can write a good composition and eventually become writers. My speech is over. " Not to be outdone, rival Zhang Yiran retorted, "I agree that reading is not necessarily beneficial. It is said that reading a good book is talking to a noble person. You must read a good book to write a good composition. If you read those pornographic books such as comic books or ghost stories, your writing level will not improve, but will continue to decline. My speech is over. " The audience immediately burst into deafening applause. All the other contestants have their own opinions. In the end, the positive side was persuaded by the negative side.
From this debate, I understand a truth: we should read books that are beneficial to our study. Draw good words and sentences in the process of reading and use them properly in your own composition, and you can write ingenious articles.
This is really an unforgettable debate!
12 that day, we held a debate contest in teacher Cui's small class.
First of all, the debaters of all sides take their positions and the debate begins.
First of all, Shang Yingkun, a debater, explained the positive view: "I agree with the positive view! Because calligraphy can cultivate sentiment and increase knowledge ... "The counter said," But writing can only exercise the left brain, not the right brain, while typing can exercise the left brain and the right brain at the same time. Isn't this killing two birds with one stone? " In this way, the war between the two sides began.
After a while, it was my turn to play. The opposing debater No.3 asked me, "With the computer, typing is more convenient and faster than handwriting, so there is no need to write." I stood up and retorted, "Although it is convenient to type sometimes, it is more convenient to write on some occasions!" " ! For example: the signature of the bank when withdrawing money ... "The other party retorted:" Writing requires wood, so forest resources will gradually disappear ... "At this time, I was speechless. Finally, Teacher Cui said, "The opposing side won!" "What a pity! It's not us who won! " I whispered in my mind.
Thus, a smoke-filled debate ended.