First, the overall feeling
It's hard to change roles freely when I just step into graduate school from undergraduate. It used to be step by step.
Classes and exams are going smoothly, and teachers have plans. Now it's all about consciousness. The master leads the door, and practice depends on it.
People, it is really difficult to cultivate the habit of autonomous learning, lack of motivation to learn, and always muddle along.
Today, I realized that the process of plowing cattle can only be advanced by whipping, even if the task is finally completed, it is doomed.
Difficulties and hardships. Senior sister is practicing, teaching is already very tired, and writing papers is really hard.
So some people just want to perfunctory. But all the tutors are very responsible and responsible for every opening report.
Tell everyone to read carefully, find problems and give students constructive guidance, which shows their responsible attitude towards students.
Rigorous style of study and persistence in one's own work. Every suggestion of the tutor is years of experience.
Sedimentation is a heavy and precious wealth for us. So, I thought, since I chose a graduate student,
On this road, I must keep in mind the sentence "We can always do it without forgetting our original intention" and study hard.
Practice, engage in research, and strive to improve personal cultivation. And I am a master of education, and I am also in charge of national education.
The future of the industry, therefore, only by constantly improving their theoretical level and applying it to practice, summing up the classics in practice.
Only by checking and doing research and practice correctly can we become a qualified educator.
Second, thinking about the topic.
"Theme" is the essence of a paper, and it is the eye. Through it, we can not only read the paper, but also spy on the author's heart.
Thought. Here are some of my thoughts:
1, the title must be "new".
The so-called "new" is not for "new", but for "new". Just to create a fairy tale out of thin air to learn.
It's a castle in the air, with no solid support at all. In my opinion, novelty means "horizontally, the side of the mountain becomes a peak, far and near."
Different heights mean a new perspective. Aside from other fields and majors, as far as ideological and political education is concerned, China
There are countless research results, and there seems to be no virgin land to develop. It is precisely these smoke bombs.
Covering our eyes, isn't the most innovative and unique thing in the world ourselves? Can someone copy us completely?
? No, so stand from your own point of view, think about the problem with your own personal experience, and don't try to dig from others.
Digging a hole to learn, your own thoughts will always be an innovation that others can't copy. Today, several tutors mentioned me repeatedly.
Students are the masters of education and have the opportunity to teach in the front line, which is something that academic graduate students do not have, so we should fully
Use this advantage to find problems in your own teaching practice. There are many problems in China's education, only in theory.
Hierarchical discussion has no practical significance, and the problems found in teaching are the real problems that need to be solved urgently.
In addition, our major is to train middle school ideological and political education teachers, which is a limitation. We pay attention to this theme.
You should highlight the characteristics of the subject in choosing the topic, and you can't talk about the problems in all subjects in general. So, about me
I think it takes a period of teaching practice to put forward more valuable and novel ideas.
2. The topic must be "precise".
The so-called "essence" is to narrow the scope of the theme to the essence and find a core point to discuss in depth, just like throwing it in.
For a stone in water, we can't just study how beautiful the ripples on the water surface are, but the focus should be on the shape of the stone entering the water.
Conditions. As the saying goes, everything is not perfect. The same is true of the topic selection. As graduate students, our ability is limited.
Problems at the national and social levels are beyond our ability. Too broad means "false, big and empty", so as long as
Just do a good job in front of you, and study the subjects, grades and even the problems in the class and class clearly.
The smaller the perimeter, the more innovative it is, the deeper it can be dug, and the more it can touch the essential issues. For example, there is a paper called "Filial Piety of Contemporary Middle School Students"
The tutors said that the topic is very good, and the question of "filial piety" is a new one, but the definition is too broad.
It is simplified as "Study on Filial Piety in Middle School Ideological and Political Education", which improves the depth of the study. Another example is paper.
The tutor pointed out that inquiry teaching is not every link in cultural life.
All classes need inquiry teaching, and it is better to be specific.
A class to learn. Of course, "essence" should also grasp a certain scale and ensure that there is something to say on the premise of accuracy.
There is something to dig.
3. The topic must be "accurate".
The so-called "accurate" means accurate definition.
General scientific research strives for accuracy, speaking with numbers, and there can be no errors. Although the humanities cannot be quantified
However, many concepts are similar. One more word and one less word will change the original intention. If the definition of the topic is not accurate, it will be easy today.
I went in the wrong direction in my later research. For example, there is a paper entitled "Research on the Present Situation, Problems and Strategies of Mental Health Education for Students in Secondary Vocational Schools"
The tutor suggested that "mental health education" here refers to "mental health education class" in a narrow sense or "broad sense"
Mental health education ",the two are very different, if not clearly defined, it will make readers misunderstand, so engage in academics."
Attention should be paid to the accuracy of language in research.
4. The topic must be "true".
The so-called "truth" is what really happens and really exists. When choosing a topic, we often pursue innovation without getting sick.
Groaning, a trivial problem can also be magnified, just because this problem has not been studied. This is malignant.
Circulation, its disadvantage will be that academics are increasingly deviating from its effectiveness. As mentioned above, the master of education must write a thesis.
Paying attention to practical research is our characteristic and advantage. Therefore, if you want to choose the right question, only practice can practice.
Tell the truth. The paper is a summary of a teaching experience, which you saw with your own eyes and heard with your own ears.
The first-hand information obtained must be more valuable and convincing than what appears in the book. Therefore, it is necessary to abandon the six-way view.
Bad habits, bow your head to practice, learn by action, and solve problems with your heart.
5. Other questions about the topic selection.
In addition to the problems discussed in detail above, I think we should pay attention to several aspects: practicality and subject learning.
, feasibility and suitability. The tutor didn't focus on the explanation. I sorted out these points by consulting my class notes, I think so.
It is worth learning.
Third, thinking about literature review.
Literature review is a summary report of a lot of preparatory work in the early stage of writing, which should not only sort out the literature read, but also mention it.
Give your own opinion. Literature review reflects the breadth and depth of the literature read by the author, which needs attention.
Question:
1, the literature should be as comprehensive as possible. We say that if a teacher wants to give a student a glass of water, he must have a bucket of water, and the same is true for writing a paper.
Therefore, only by consulting a large number of relevant documents can we fully understand the development of the subject, including foreign and domestic.
Yes, there is not enough ink in my chest, so it is difficult to write a well-founded paper. This inspired me to read more books and read good books.
Make full use of library and network resources to broaden knowledge.
2. Choose newer literature. Our topic selection should be innovative, and references should keep pace with the times and keep up with academic development.
Trend, screening out the latest literature, so as to better reflect the characteristics of the times, we are more likely to combine with reality.
3. Select representative, scientific and reliable documents. As the old saying goes, you are in a hurry to see a doctor. We are writing.
This kind of problem often happens when reading all the documents related to the topic, so that you can't find the key points or even get the exam.
Considering the reliability of the literature, the result is "a hundred flowers blossom and colorful", and it is impossible to distinguish good from bad. So, choose
Find an authoritative organization for the literature, pay attention to screening, and don't believe it all.
4. Be loyal to the referees. We often have the psychology that all the selected materials are for the paper.
Therefore, when there is something inconsistent with the thesis, some materials will be selectively tampered with to meet the thesis. I went out myself.
I have made such a mistake. In the future research, we should respect science, maintain a rigorous scientific research attitude and seek truth from facts.
Fourthly, thinking about the framework of the thesis.
Frame is the skeleton of the whole paper and the reflection of the author's thoughts. I think we should pay attention to several points when writing a paper framework.
Question:
1, think clearly. Including two aspects, one is the relevance of each title. In other words, the title of the paper should have one
Fixed order
Sex, such as the common formula of "purpose-meaning-present situation-problem-strategy", should be logical, but generally not.
The second question is whether the content under a certain heading is appropriate. Our thesis will involve three-level titles or even four-level titles. The higher the level,
The more, the easier it is to get confused. What should belong to this title is written under other titles, and the consistency between the content and the title.
Not high, it seems to suit this title and that title. Therefore, as mentioned above, the topic should be accurate and advanced.
The idea is closely related to the theme, with strong pertinence and not easy to be confused.
2. prioritize. This still needs to be combined with the topic. There is a common problem in today's opening report.
Problem, that's putting the cart before the horse. Everyone puts forward a question to study according to their own practice, and introduces it first when writing.
Relevant theoretical knowledge of this problem, such as purpose, significance, principle, etc. And then start to talk about practical significance. This idea is right.
It's just that the discussion theory is too long. These theories are summarized by predecessors and loaded into books. There is no need to take them out again.
A long speech makes people unable to see new ideas, as if it were an accumulation of opinions. The practical part should be the focus, but it is ignored. this
This phenomenon is very common when we do papers. When we collect a lot of relevant information, we hope to write them all in the paper.
To show how good you are, in fact, it will make readers admire your reading and think that you have no self. therefore
Doing research should be down-to-earth, think more and create more.
The above is the experience of attending the opening report meeting. Wish you all the best!