Jin Jiankang system

The reason why Macron proposed to reform the pension system as soon as he took office was actually to activate the labor market and reduce the burden on the government. The earlier the reform, the better. At present, the amount of pension expenditure in France has accounted for 15% of French national income. If this continues, the labor market will only become lower and lower, and people will rely more on pensions. When the country really can't come up with so many pensions, the people will eventually lose. Therefore, even though Macron strongly opposes many people, it is for the good of all.

The reform of the pension system can not only reduce the burden on the government, but also reduce the pressure on the French people. If this reform is really implemented, it means that the current salary of workers must reach 4300 euros to pay the pension ratio. However, the current data in France prove that only 10% of the people's monthly income reaches this figure, which directly means that the living standards of most French people will be reduced. Thinking about whether to pay a high fee or extend the retirement age is bound to make most people dissatisfied with the original pension system.

However, it is not easy to implement this pension system in Marrakech. The government should unload the heavy burden so that the people's living standards will not decline, and neither can go backwards. This reform can either not be implemented or will directly cause strong resistance from the French people.

In this case, what is Macron's commitment to his campaign? Will it not reform the legal retirement age or change the pension level? This promise will become a lie, and those who support Macron will also have strong dissatisfaction with Macron. But as far as I'm concerned, this kind of pension system is very difficult to implement, and the final result is that Macron chooses to regress.