Many research institutions around the world agree that global warming will reach 3 degrees by the end of this century, and there is no need to take further measures. The international community is trying to reduce the temperature below 1.5 degrees. 1 2 degrees is not much for individuals, but it is a national event on a global scale. The peak of carbon dioxide emissions reached a record level in a period of time (not a certain year, but several years in a row), and then began to decline.
Carbon neutrality means achieving almost zero greenhouse gas emissions through carbon sinks (that is, carbon stabilization: including afforestation and carbon dioxide collection) and other opposing means. Western countries began to prepare for the peak of carbon neutrality. Why didn't China do this at that time, and now the carbon level suddenly rises to the peak of carbon neutrality? Is it really because carbon dioxide emissions will lead to global warming, or even global warming is really just because we emit a lot of carbon dioxide? Now, China's industrialization has been completed, and it is ready to transform and upgrade its industries.
In the past few years, China has been actively protecting the environment. Now, western countries and states can see that the United States needs to return to manufacturing, which needs a lot of fossil energy. Now China can be used to prevent global warming, prevent other countries from industrialization and develop economic transformation, which is also a force for China's industrial transformation and upgrading.
Let me tell you a very simple thing. We haven't seen all kinds of reports from all over the world since childhood. How many years will it take for oil to dry up, and how many years will it take for only 20 sufficient resources to dry up? But what about now? The consumption of global resources is increasing, especially in developed industrialized countries, and oil is becoming scarcer and scarcer? China's dependence on fossil energy (that is, you: oil) is an unsafe development path.