One of them is a flicker: turning a vivid, moving, integrated and connected life form into a static, isolated and one-sided inspection index. If these indicators are understood as the real state of human beings, it is really sky-high for them. Therefore, in my opinion, these investigations are very similar to blind people touching elephants or carving boats for swords. They just blindly pursue one aspect of things, forgetting that all aspects of things are inevitably related, and the performance characteristics of individuals cannot sum up the whole. Explain this metaphor in physical examination, that is, don't judge the overall body function by the appearance of a certain part of the human body at a certain moment. This is naturally not an accurate test result.
The second measure: mechanical one-sided understanding of the inspection index. For the results marked in the inspection indicators, Western medicine often refuses to pay attention to and deeply study the other aspect of indicator marking. Everyone knows that everything has two sides. Take the most common "diabetes" today as an example. High blood sugar not only shows that the patient's blood sugar content is high, but also shows that the blood sugar indexes of other parts of the body are also in an abnormal state. People with high blood sugar don't have the special function of absorbing sugar from breathing, so where do those extra sugar come from? Therefore, if the diet is controlled again, although the indicators are normal, the lack of sugar in the body will be even more lacking, and I am afraid that the overall health status of patients will be unsatisfactory.
The third measure: treat the so-called abnormal indicators as diseases independently and arbitrarily. The human body will make different independent responses when resisting various diseases, but the inspection indicators often ignore this abnormal state at this time and blindly think that the inspected indicators are the normal state of the human body itself. For example, a cold and fever, the stronger the body, the higher the body temperature. The reason is that fever is the stimulation and mobilization of people's own disease-resistant function. To reduce the fever as soon as you get started is tantamount to pulling out your gun and destroying your Great Wall while resisting foreign aggression. So what do we use to fight the disease?
The fourth fool: too much trust in indicators, ignoring mental factors. Only by unilaterally passing the inspection index, the body was immediately labeled as a disease. No one knows how much stress these terrible words such as "diabetes", "hypertension", "coronary heart disease", "liver cirrhosis" and "cancer" will cause to people's spirit. People are different from animals, and human mental factors cannot be ignored. Will and confidence are the basic elements to overcome diseases. When the hat is pressed, the mental breakdown, minor lesions are serious, and the serious illness is scared to death. Isn't this more terrible than those numbers and letters?
The fifth flicker: indicators are omnipotent. As can be seen from the above, the index is abnormal, not necessarily sick, and not necessarily as serious as the index shows. On the contrary, what has not been paid attention to is that the human body feels abnormal when all the indicators are normal. This proves that indicators are not omnipotent. For example, the indicators can't find out people's emotional changes, whether their appetite has dropped, and whether they sleep well, not to mention "sub-health" states such as dizziness, brain swelling and fatigue. In fact, this time is often the time to make serious adjustments. Blindly believing in those indicators is really not as good as believing in your own sensory science. I'm afraid the precision and accuracy of the human body's own feelings can't be replaced by any instrument.
What's more, checking glaucoma makes people drink a lot of water in a short time, checking heart disease makes people do extreme exercise, and puncture biopsy is always allowed. This kind of examination has gone far beyond the degree of "fooling", and it can be said that it is causing and aggravating diseases. In the face of this kind of inspection, you should be careful and make up your own mind. One wrong step, it's too late to regret it!
Now, I don't know how you feel in the face of such "fudge". Can this inspection be regarded as a sacred and unshakable science? I am always used to accusing others of "pseudoscience". Now, is this "fake" hat just right for me? Superstition is always undesirable, and it is even more undesirable if it goes too far, so don't let these "fudges" confuse yourself. You know, it doesn't matter if you are confused by a joke, but you can't work hard on serious things!
Of course, "fudge" is not without its merits. Only its oneness can facilitate grasping the information that can be grasped in the ever-changing and complicated life activities. Although it is not as precise and accurate as it claims, it is also one of the ways to find the reference factor. Only its mechanical nature can facilitate targeted, decisive and quantitative medication in one place and two places, and it is naturally not a good thing to look back and miss the opportunity; Just in terms of its nature, it is like a great drink, which makes people alert and attach great importance to their own diseases, so as not to aggravate them in confusion.
At the peak of life science, if you don't pretend to be a science, you may not have reached others' heads as you feel. If you are not careful, you may slip under your feet, and your face is really awkward!
One more thing, because it is too far away from science, I really don't want to say it, but I feel sorry for everyone if I don't say it thoroughly. Behind the sacred aura of the grandiose and hypocritical "scientific" test, there is an "elf" at work, and that is money. Euphemistically called "income generation". Isn't it a bit immoral to just stare at money in front of life-threatening events? I won't elaborate, no one is stupid, just think for yourself! To tell the truth too much, I'm really afraid of being hit by a black stick when I walk at night! In fact, saying so much is nothing more than getting more patients out of a credulous misunderstanding, and don't let some numbers and letters block the road to health.