Who do you think will be healthier, the lazy person or the diligent person? Longer life?

First, lazy people, if they love to eat, sleep, work and exercise, are generally not very healthy. But if he idles around, travels around, is too lazy to work, is carefree, has no pressure and is open-minded, this person will live a long and healthy life.

Second, an industrious person will break down from overwork if he works beyond his physical limit. But if he pays attention to the combination of work and rest, labor will create wealth for him, bring happiness and be beneficial to longevity.

Lazy people are confident and of course healthy. Hard-working people live and work in the dark. How can they have time to prevent diseases?

Which is healthier, laziness or hard work, definitely depends on their living habits, because living habits and eating habits have a great influence on a person's health and longevity. Of course, the influence of genes on longevity should not be underestimated.

Lazy people, if they eat three meals on time every day, can ensure a balanced diet, don't stay up late, don't drink, don't smoke, and although they don't exercise much, they won't have any serious health problems. They will also have some activities during normal work, but their bodies will not be very strong, but their basic quality is ok. Of course, if they are too lazy to cook and rely on takeout for three meals a day, the impact on their health will be even greater and some problems will arise.

If you are a diligent person, eat three meals on time every day, have a balanced diet, don't stay up late, don't drink, don't smoke, exercise moderately every day and have enough rest, then you must have better physical fitness than a lazy person, but for life expectancy, of course, this is related to genetic factors, but if you are a diligent person, you like bad habits such as overeating, smoking, drinking and staying up late.

In fact, if you want to live a long and healthy life, it's very simple. Just leave a line in everything and leave some space. You can eat, but in moderation, you can exercise, but it's best not to overdo it. You can make trouble, but you can stay up all night, but once a week, you can smoke, but occasionally. You can drink, but a small amount is good. If you can do this, there is no problem with health. If there is still genetic blessing, longevity is not a problem.

"Laziness and diligence" is a moral and educational issue.

"Health and longevity" is a physiological health care problem.

This question is like a set moral trap.

I answer this question by turning laziness and hard work into stillness and movement. Is the logic smooth?

Life lies in stillness!

1. In the sense of life and biology, cell division is limited, and the temperature (heat) of exercise accelerates cell division and metabolism and organ aging.

Second, the external movement of the human body accelerates the operation (movement) of organs, such as running to speed up the heartbeat. (This is not a case, everyone knows)

Third, proper exercise is beneficial to life, but the prerequisite is not to violently aggravate the normal heartbeat.

Fourthly, the occupational health of China culture is embodied in Taoism, Buddhism and even Confucianism. Taoism and Buddhism meditate and take deep breaths, while Confucianism's most representative health care method is "cherishing blessings"-that is, eating less to reduce the burden of gastrointestinal exercise, and at the same time achieving the purpose of letting organs such as liver, gallbladder and pancreas participate in secretion less and get rest.

5. The relationship between exercise and quietness and longevity is a representative example in the animal kingdom. High-exercise animals (such as leopards) have a short life cycle, while low-exercise animals (such as turtles) have a long life cycle.

Whether laziness is short-lived or diligence is long-lasting, let ethicists answer it. (Welcome to discuss)

Laziness and diligence seem to have nothing to do with the length of life! From another point of view: lazy people are lazy, lazy and have a long life, which is a pity. Hard-working people are conscientious and successful, even if life is short, it is commendable!

Laziness and hard work may affect people's health, but I think it should be excessive laziness and hard work.

I think people who work hard are healthier. Because people's life is related to sports, hard work is also a kind of exercise, but it should be kept moderate, and excessive efforts are harmful to the health. If you are healthy, your quality of life will be improved and your life will be prolonged. Laziness is harmful to people and unhealthy. Of course, can people who are in poor health still talk about longevity?

Thank you for inviting me. Personally, I think these are two things that are not necessarily logically related. First of all, laziness and diligence are ways of behavior or thinking, and the difference between them may not necessarily lead to the length of life; Secondly, the determinants of longevity are very complicated, such as heredity, living environment, accidental factors, lifestyle (including behavior and thinking mode of course) and so on; Third, even if the life span is related, it is not positively related. If other factors are favorable, lazy people may live longer, and if other factors are unfavorable (such as not paying attention to work and rest, staying up too late, etc.), hardworking people may not live long. ).

Of course, hard work will prolong life. Because of hard work, you will accumulate wealth, get better treatment when you are sick, accumulate more knowledge so that you can know how to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages without doing stupid things, and have a good mental state because of the hope of life. These are the elements of longevity.

Of course: industrious people,