What can't money buy?

There is a view that money is not everything, and nothing can be done without money. Although this is a compliment to money, it also potentially says that some things can't be bought by money. What can't money buy? There used to be a popular saying that money can't buy a bed, sleep, food, appetite and health. This enumeration is of course wrong. Money can buy sleep, and technology can do it. On the contrary, people who have no money can't sleep, and money can buy an appetite. To tell the truth, this problem is not complicated. As we all know, people have an appetite when they are hungry. As for health, on the contrary, people without money can't get health. Rich people are more likely to get healthy, whether they work hard or look down on illness. Many of these lists are wrong, but they have become evidence that money talks. If you refute others and the evidence is questionable, it will be even more indestructible. In fact, some things can't be bought by money, so I suddenly want to talk about this problem briefly. What can't money buy? The first category, artistic talent. The art mentioned here includes only three categories, literature, painting and music. With money, you can get the title of artist, but you can't get artistic talent. Because artistic talent can't be bought by money, it has such great value in any historical era of mankind. Immeasurable value. How rich are you? You can buy the works of Sima Qian, Van Gogh and Beethoven, but you can't buy their creative talents. It's not just these people You can't imitate a villain, even if you can write, and everyone writes differently. It can't be exactly the same People with thinking ability will think of another thing here, saying that technology can't be bought except art. You can buy technical talents, but you can't buy their skills. I didn't include this because technology can be purchased indirectly. For example, repairing cars, he can spend time learning this if he has money, and he will certainly learn it well. Why do you say you can learn well? For example, if your car breaks down, say that the headlight line is broken. Whoever wants to repair this car must connect this line. Know what I mean? Everyone has thousands of ways to correct mistakes, and the way to correct them is the same. The biggest difference between technology and art is that technology has rules and patterns and can be imitated. And any existence that can be imitated can be obtained through hard study. Although the rich can't buy technology directly, they can indirectly make themselves so capable. We might as well extend our ability to have money to the extreme here. That is, if you have money, you can learn technology and then have technical ability. You can learn art with money, but the creation of art is completely different. When an ability reaches art, it cannot be learned. To put it simply, such as writing, as I mentioned earlier, you can learn if you have money, but you don't have to learn to write, but everyone's expression of words can't be imitated. Use pictures to be clearer. You can learn to paint with money, but painters can't learn the feeling of color and light. This is a gift. I'm talking about a real master. Artistic abilities can't be bought, because they are rooted in feelings. And everyone's feelings about the world are not only different, but also have many natural reasons. The second category is love. We might as well expand the power of money, thinking that even family and friendship can be bought. You have money, and others are really good to you. You can have some real friends. As for blood relationship, it is better to think as much as possible. Rich people can naturally get many opportunities to reproduce, and they can also have many relatives by hook or by crook. If these relatives can have affection, there will always be. As long as there is one, even if there is, love is different, and love is also based on feelings. A person doesn't know who he will fall in love with. I can't control it. You can control whether you are with this person or not, and you can see him or her, but you can't control the feeling of love. Endure it, and you will still love it when it is gone. Love here is about the uncontrollable feeling inside, and love is a feeling. Rich people can buy beautiful women, handsome guys. You can also let these people stay, but there is no way to make love with money. Love is both sides, and they can't make others feel their love with money. Although they can get these people they like with money. Some people say that love can't grow with time. What happens over time is not love, but feelings. The power of love is too strong, and it is also extremely warm and happy. This unclear thing, in fact, has been or has been, the heart will understand. Money can't buy these two things, even if the power of money is extended to the extreme, it can't buy these two things. Besides, other basic things can be bought with money. The power of money is enormous. Then the wise man immediately saw a problem. You can't even buy these two things, but rich people can have them. In fact, some rich people are relatively easy. Being rich expands one's freedom and ability, so one doesn't have to spend too much time working hard, so one has time to cope with life. If a person has artistic talent, it is more conducive to exercising and developing his artistic talent. If you have time, you can think a lot, be careful, and have the kung fu and ability to deal with love. I've thought of all this, so I won't deny it. My topic is just discussing things that money can't buy. No, rich people don't. From these discussions, some people will think, in fact, I am still supporting money and the rich in disguise. I don't support the rich. Nor does it support the poor. I'm talking about an opinion, and I hope it doesn't have any emotions or prejudices. Rich people are of course good. On the one hand, money proves this person's contribution to society in economy and society. This is their reward. On the one hand, it proves their personal ability. They adapt to this society and can find a way. The most important aspect is that money is an extension of personal freedom and ability. With money, you don't have to spend unnecessary time on survival, but you can concentrate on thinking and dealing with some more valuable problems. With money, you can help others directly and get rid of some of their difficulties. Money is a realistic and direct force. In addition, money can also bring personal enjoyment and satisfaction. In fact, this is the last question, because people's enjoyment and satisfaction, this feeling, to a large extent, does not depend on money. Social discourse often regards this last stream as the mainstream, and as a result, it is easy to become a slave to money. The greatest value of money is that it can guarantee personal freedom and help others. I am very supportive of money, although I am one of the few people who are extremely unprofitable. I won't deny the value of money just because I haven't earned a penny for decades because of my serious lack of earning ability. I don't like many things, not disgust, but I can't like them. But I can't deny the strength and value of many things I can't like. Just like I don't like prostitutes, I really saw two the other day. I can't like the temperament of prostitutes at a glance, but I don't deny the beauty of those two prostitutes or the social value of prostitutes. Of course, I won't deny them personally. As I said before, prostitutes can't be trusted. Anyone who can betray himself can betray anything. But I will not deny the personal value of prostitutes. They are also human beings, and may even be very good people. Money is a kind of power, and it is the greatest power in the economy and society. In the economic society, it means almost everything. And the scope of all this is still very large. I think it's good. Money society will bring many problems, but any society will bring many problems. The progress of money society compared with power society lies in that money society gives people more freedom of choice. For example, in a power society, a powerful person has a crush on you. She can rape you without any responsibility, and you can't escape this kind of rape. In a money society, rich people can buy you if they like you, but only if you agree. You can choose to be bribed or not, and he can't rape you, which violates the law, at least it is likely to be punished. The power society has no regulations and is not recognized by the society to deal with powerful rapists. In other words, economy and society give you freedom of choice. Some kind of freedom. This is an improvement. Only economy and society can achieve democracy. It is possible to exclude privileges, although money is still a kind of power. But this kind of power is relatively more restricted, and the power of a power society is almost unrestricted. Another progress is the liquidity of money. If you are rich today, you may have nothing tomorrow. Poor today, may be rich tomorrow. Different from the power society, power is hereditary or flows in the inner circle. For example, if you are not of royal blood, you can't become an emperor in normal procedure. If you are not of noble descent, no matter how hard you try, you can't win this title. But in a money society, you can get rich by proper means. Money is not the root of all evil, but the motive force of society. Trying to make money is definitely the right way. Everyone is for himself. But don't forget what money is for. If money is the ultimate goal, then money is useless, so all efforts for money are useless. Simply put, if you earn money and spend it, you can spend it well. If you earn money, you don't spend it, but you save it just to accumulate. What you said is that this is the ultimate goal, and money is meaningless. When money becomes the ultimate goal, money is useless and loses the meaning of exchange, and all efforts become meaningless. In other words, money is just an intermediary. The better the intermediary completes, the better the value will be brought into play. For example, you make money for a better life, and you use money to improve your life. In order to have more free time, you should give yourself more free time with money. Many people mistakenly regard money as the ultimate goal. As a result, something more valuable is often lost. You must understand the purpose and means of making a good choice. The simplest, for example, you earn money to be filial and make your parents happier. People in China stress filial piety, so they don't go home to see their parents for more than ten years. When you earn money, your parents will die. For example, you make money to be happier with your lover, so you don't care about your lover. You made money, you made enough money, and your lover ran away with someone. You lost your goal. Many people don't understand this truth and often have problems when choosing. Reminds me of some people, because they are busy making money, they ignore their relatives, and their relatives run away with others. When men saved them, they also said, who am I making money for, not for you? This kind of redemption is generally useless. Women are not stupid at all. They are intuitive species, which are often confused by men. Their actual behavior reversed the means and purpose. Such examples often limit people's lives. I don't understand what I'm going to say, because I'm talking about everyday emotions. Then I'll give you one that I value more. Freedom. I had a job and resigned soon. The reason for resigning is that I feel that I have no time for myself and I am very busy working overtime. I slept after a busy day, and my salary was not very high. I don't need money very much, so I don't think it is necessary to do it. Because most of the time what I want with money is freedom. I have my own time. At least at that time. This example is not suitable for everyone. I mean, understand the relationship between what you value and money. Money is just a means. This is also the reason why workaholics are not valued in the marriage and love market. Marriage is really a market, and I'm not talking about love. Or it has nothing to do with love. Workaholics, whether male or female, are not favored in the marriage and love market, because others will understand that their focus is not on feelings, although it may not be money, but other things, personal freedom, personal value and personal ability. To protect these, there are workaholics. First of all, let me say that I don't think there is anything wrong with people who don't value marriage or even love. Everyone has different choices. As long as they personally feel that there is no problem, everything will be fine. I just suddenly want to mention that if you are an emotional person, you'd better not choose a workaholic, otherwise it will cause great contradictions between the two sides. To see behind a person's advantages, there must be shortcomings, not just one side. But if your goal is family, workaholism is a good choice. They are so responsible for their work, which is a sense of responsibility. Workaholics are generally reliable men and women, except for some special ones, such as some workaholics, whose purpose is to make money, spend money and be hedonistic. That's understandable. But their sense of responsibility has shifted to themselves. They are not wasting their time in their own way, not at home. In short, workaholics should be responsible no matter what position they are transferred to. Behind this responsibility is the lack of some feelings. Understand the pros and cons before you can choose. It is not good to see only the advantages or disadvantages. It will bring many mistakes, even fatal mistakes, to the choice. Generally speaking, workaholics tend to be more active. If you know that a person is a workaholic, this person can be trusted at least to a great extent, especially when dealing with some things. Everyone's advantages and disadvantages are complementary. It is impossible to separate. Many people's judgments and choices often focus on the advantages, and abandon their own shortcomings, perfectionism, because there is no perfection, it is difficult to do. Just as we want horses to run fast and eat less, we can only fake them. Just like Tathagata and love, you can only choose one. Deny love if you want Tathagata, and deny Tathagata if you want love. You can't have it both ways. This is a kind of conflict. It is difficult for men to make money and be romantic, because these two kinds of thinking are in conflict. When you choose one, it is largely accompanied by the denial of the other. You should think about this and make your own choice. For example, like me, I can say many interesting things when I want to talk when I am happy. I can't tell jokes, but it will really make people feel interesting and show people another world. But my ability to the real society is very low, and I don't earn much money. Many times this is the front and back of a coin. I think my situation is not good. I want to explain the duality of interdependence more directly. Many years ago, I said that a person's greatest strength is his greatest weakness. These are two aspects. Money also has two sides. Making money will bring people great freedom and great additional ability. But making money also consumes a lot of things. How to balance and choose, we must first understand what we want. The second question about money is. Not everyone has the ability to make big money. I find that entrepreneurship is generally needed. Actually, this is a good thing. It is good for everyone and good for society. Everyone generally wants to make a lot of money when starting a business, which will be very hard. Making a lot of money is really an ability. If you get along with those successful entrepreneurs, you will understand that their vision and thinking are really capable. Not everyone has this ability. Know your own abilities. Just like writing, no one can be a writer. Writers are only secular honors, and there are different opinions. More appropriately, not everyone has a genius. But everyone can write. My writing is a disease, which belongs to a special point. Similarly, the truth in the world is mostly the same, and so is entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is good, but when starting a business, there will be many problems if you blindly embrace the inevitable success and make a lot of money. A few years ago, a friend invited me to write something inspirational together, and I refused. One is that I can't write, and the other is that I don't think such things are good. I can responsibly tell any passionate person who is ready to start a business, or any passionate person in any field. If there is no successful person in any field, just say the most fashionable business. No successful businessman is achieved by inspirational things. Because it is calmness and reason that give people wisdom. It is possible to succeed. I remember discussing with that friend that year, and he felt that inspirational was great. Inspiring. I think it's just spiritual opium, like some small essays, but it destroys people. Destroyed this man's ego. That doesn't make them successful. This reminds me of some people who claim to love literature. I read magazines and essays every day. I feel like literature. I love literature. Those little things like narcotics, then you'll never know what literature is. Just as you simply read articles in economic magazines and don't know what economy is, you can't grasp the root. That's just arty. Of course, there is no need to blame such people. Actually, I think it's a good thing to be arty. Just like some people always say that star disaster relief is a show, just show it, and use your influence to bring some benefits to the disaster area. It is better to choose elegance than not to choose elegance. This is not a question of authenticity, hypocrites are hateful, because it is deceptive and purposeful to use falsehood purely for other purposes. People who are arty are often elegant. But the essence of elegance is not arty. This is another question. Although this text is messy, it is still classified as text, because it actually tells a lot of personal opinions that I think are important. These views are not thought of as soon as my mind is hot, but rigid personal views obtained after long-term thinking and personal verification. I also think that these views are not only sincere, but also have some greater significance and value.