2 ,
The host told a thought-provoking legal story: an incident happened in Lei Feng's hometown of Hunan Province. This summer vacation, three children from the same village went to the reservoir near the village to catch fish. When one of them accidentally slipped into the deep water area and his life was dying, another child 12 years old tried his best to push his little friend who fell into the deep water to the shore, but he sank to the bottom of the water because of exhaustion and drowned. Seeing this, I feel sorry for the little hero who saved people. His behavior of sacrificing himself to save others is the embodiment of Lei Feng's spirit, which deserves our study and praise!
3,
An employer in Fuzhou often abused the nanny at home and finally killed her one day. In order to destroy the body, the employer's wife pretended to be the nanny's sister and cremated the body. The court ruled that the employer intentionally injured the death penalty, and the wife sheltered three years in prison.
According to expert analysis, employers and nannies are not masters and servants, and their status is equal. The state should amend the labor law to protect the legitimate interests of people who have personal employment relations, such as nannies. Now their interests are not guaranteed. In addition, in order to restrain the nanny's behavior, the employer should sign a good contract with the nanny or use the power of the judiciary.
4,
Chen Bing found a thief stealing his bag at the railway station and went after him. I chased it for about 200 meters. The result was sudden death. The thief had no physical contact with him. Sports medicine experts analyzed that he may have died suddenly because of heart problems.
Experts say that there is a causal relationship between the thief's theft and Chen Bing's death. But it only constitutes theft. Sentencing can be regarded as an aggravating circumstance as appropriate. The thief was at fault for Chen Bing's death, but Chen Bing's family did not demand civil compensation from the thief. Finally, the thief was sentenced to 4 years for attempted theft and fined 3000 yuan.
5,
Lao Wu got a strange disease and went to many hospitals without finding it out. Finally, it was diagnosed as cryptococcal pneumonia in a hospital in Nanjing. The doctor said that the disease may be caused by pigeon droppings. Mrding, Lao Wu's upstairs, keeps many pigeons, and Mrding regards them as treasures. Lao Wu negotiated with Mrding many times and asked him to dismantle dovecote, but Mrding didn't agree. Both sides hold their own words. But Lao Wu took Mrding to court. Mrding took out an identification material, saying that his pigeon feces did not contain Cryptococcus. The court held that one side of the case was a personal hobby and the other side was a person's health. These two rights are competitive, so people's health should be paid more attention. Therefore, the court ordered Mrding to dismantle the pigeon house within a time limit. Now the pigeons in Mrding have been temporarily put in foster care at a friend's house.
According to expert analysis, this is an infringement case. Although it is not illegal for Mrding to raise pigeons, he violated Lao Wu's right to health. As for the documents produced by Mrding, experts believe that it is impossible to confirm whether its letter-opening institution has the qualification of appraisal. Even if it has the qualification of appraisal, the effectiveness of the materials depends on the case.
5,
Lao Wu got a strange disease and went to many hospitals without finding it out. Finally, it was diagnosed as cryptococcal pneumonia in a hospital in Nanjing. The doctor said that the disease may be caused by pigeon droppings. Mrding, Lao Wu's upstairs, keeps many pigeons, and Mrding regards them as treasures. Lao Wu negotiated with Mrding many times and asked him to dismantle dovecote, but Mrding didn't agree. Both sides hold their own words. But Lao Wu took Mrding to court. Mrding took out an identification material, saying that his pigeon feces did not contain Cryptococcus. The court held that one side of the case was a personal hobby and the other side was a person's health. These two rights are competitive, so people's health should be paid more attention. Therefore, the court ordered Mrding to dismantle the pigeon house within a time limit. Now the pigeons in Mrding have been temporarily put in foster care at a friend's house.
According to expert analysis, this is an infringement case. Although it is not illegal for Mrding to raise pigeons, he violated Lao Wu's right to health. As for the documents produced by Mrding, experts believe that it is impossible to confirm whether its letter-opening institution has the qualification of appraisal. Even if it has the qualification of appraisal, the effectiveness of the materials depends on the case.
6,
Ms. Qi, a builder, invested one million yuan to build a building, but stopped working because the builder went bankrupt. She ran for seven years without getting a penny back, and the wages of construction workers were not cashed. After failing to recover her debts, she appealed to the district court. Although she won the case, the judgment issued was just a dead letter. Funny afterwards, the county court in the same city boldly auctioned the building for 6.5438+0.8 million yuan, because the builder had owed a unit in the jurisdiction 200,000 yuan. The money is still evasive, and an unrelated woman has a fake real estate license (absconding).
7,
Hu Guangxing, a citizen of Zhengzhou, was arrested and released several times by three grassroots policemen in this city within a few months because his ID number was the same as that of an online wanted criminal. The three families accept the leadership of the same city bureau, and the three arrests are all in the same place, and they don't communicate with each other! Is it bureaucratic dereliction of duty? Still ridiculous? According to some data, due to various reasons, it is estimated that nearly one million people in China have duplicate ID cards. If you want to handle the case with the attitude of these three policemen, I don't know how many people will encounter such bad luck!
8,
After Xiao Xia, a deceived woman in Shaanxi, disappeared, her parents turned to the police for help, but the police station refused. While I was looking around, someone sent a message saying that I was somewhere in Shanxi, and I rushed several times (people were transferred), but I reported the case in Shanxi and was rejected by the police station. After all the hardships, Xiao Xia's father almost cried. A stranger can help him again and again, but the police in both places do little.
9,
19 years ago, the husband of peasant woman He Aihong was stabbed to death in broad daylight, but the report was treated coldly. At this time, someone surrendered, but the police did not seriously investigate why he surrendered. What does it have to do with the real killer? As a result, people were released in a hurry and the opportunity to handle the case was missed. The public security is unreliable. He Aihong has gone through all kinds of hardships to pursue the murder of 19! Finally, the real murderer was found in a different place, and she hurried back to report the case. Unexpectedly, the public security personnel said: In recent years, the leaders have been changing and the case handlers have been updating, so it is impossible to re-investigate the case.
10,
A 3-year-old child and his parents went to a hotel for dinner. During the dinner, the child wanted to drink and the mother went out to buy it. She wanted the child to follow her father, but the child didn't want to, so the mother took him down. Later, the child ran into the road, and a waiter in the hotel saved the child, but he died in a car accident. At first, the parents said that they entrusted the child to the bar, and later they said that they entrusted the child to the waiter, but there was no evidence to prove it. They think the waiter should be responsible for the child's injury. The two sides went to court, and the court ruled that the driver of the traffic accident should bear 80% of the civil compensation liability, and the parents of the children should bear 20%. The death compensation is 6.5438+0.5 million yuan, but the compensators object. The waiter is a rural hukou, and even if he works in the city for 2 years, he should pay 50,000 yuan according to the specifications of the countryside.