Even in peacetime, we can't forget that disasters and dangers are close to us. Based on this theory, disaster films are often used by the film and television industry to enlighten the audience. Korean films have done a good job in this respect, and they are very good at combining disasters with humanity, stimulating thinking and earning enough tears at the same time. This movie is like this. Although it was released six years ago, the core soul conveyed by the film still keeps pace with the times.
Korean movies are never afraid of the scars and shortcomings of their own country, so I also like to watch some Korean movies. In the movie "Influenza", the incompetence and cowardice of the South Korean president were satirized. Korean films like to expose human shortcomings and criticize the government. There is a short comment on China movies on Douban: They have movies that change the country, and we have countries that change movies. That's true. Korean movies are very exquisite in both subject matter and shooting. Is the choice of the government right or wrong? Actually, I don't think there is an answer.
The two most prominent features of this film are the tense plot and the touching plot. What is more worth learning is the depiction of reason and emotion. According to this, it is obvious that the roles headed by men and women and the president tend to be emotional, such as the representative of the United States is the rational side. In fact, the overall orientation of the film is emotional, which leads many viewers to think that the American representative is simply cold-blooded in the process and will bomb if he doesn't agree. This is actually related to the shooting method of the film. It is easier for the audience to have a good impression on the main characters in the film, and naturally they look at other shaping less friendly.
Although the act of isolating patients will produce cruel emotions to their families, from the perspective of healthy people, it ensures their safety. The practice similar to that of the hostess is also a hidden danger, which has shown unfairness here; The president insisted on refusing to give up sick people, and at the same time he was betting on the lives of healthy people. I can't come to a conclusion whether the incident should be handled rationally or won emotionally, because different people must have different considerations and will produce different results.