Under the overall stable situation of national epidemic prevention and control, the outbreak and spillover of Nanjing epidemic have caused many problems and variables to the national epidemic prevention. At the same time, how to "break through the defense" of this epidemic has also raised doubts from public opinion. Under the background of normalization of epidemic prevention and control, how should the government and the public respond to the epidemic rebound in some areas? How to block the spread of the epidemic and minimize the impact on economic development and people's lives? It is a question worth pondering.
Airports, ports, docks and borders are all outposts of epidemic prevention and control. In the face of the grim situation of the re-opening of the world and the high incidence of imported infections, the responsibility of these outposts can be described as significant. Previously, staff infections occurred in Shenzhen Baoan International Airport and Shanghai Pudong International Airport, requiring these important places to implement stricter and more professional management models. However, all kinds of low-level mistakes and neglect of management at Lukou Airport have led to extremely serious consequences. This also proves that the epidemic prevention and control has the characteristics of interlocking, and the failure of one link will lead to a chain reaction, which will make more people's efforts go up in smoke.
It can be seen that the normalization of epidemic prevention and control is not empty talk, but requires that every level should always maintain a sense of crisis and overall situation. Epidemic prevention can not only be superficial, but also need to pay attention to every detail. Relevant schemes should be improved and perfected. Only by strengthening the concept of responsibility for defending the soil and implementing scientific prevention and control actions at each pass can we consolidate the hard-won prevention and control achievements.
On the one hand, various prevention and control measures will inevitably affect the normal operation of society to a certain extent. Previously, some areas overreacted to the epidemic, adopted "one size fits all" control at every turn, and even abused "wartime state" and other measures, which triggered widespread social criticism. With the normalization of epidemic prevention work, it is required to reduce the expenditure of social costs as much as possible, and it is necessary to emphasize the scientificity and accuracy of epidemic prevention and control. In this sense, some prevention and control measures in Nanjing may have good intentions to prevent "overcorrection" and cannot be completely denied. On the other hand, with the further escalation of risk factors such as virus mutation and epidemic spread, accurate epidemic prevention measures themselves must stand the test of reality and need to keep pace with the times and make scientific adjustments in order to truly guarantee the public's sense of security. Therefore, how to find a more reasonable balance between epidemic prevention and control and people's livelihood economy, and between civil rights and civil obligations not only tests Nanjing, but also tests the wisdom of more local governments.
I believe that with the efforts of all parties, the Nanjing epidemic will eventually subside. More importantly, the epidemic is not only a crisis test, but also provides a valuable opportunity for review and reflection. It is expected that the whole society can learn from it and sum up experience to further improve the quality and efficiency of normal prevention and control and precise prevention and control. Only in this way can we firmly hold every line of defense and finally win the victory against the epidemic.