Canon 6d2 with 70200 lens can the snap hold up?

Canon 6d2 with 70200 lens can the snap hold up?

You don't have to worry about this question at all.

If you use it normally, without accidental bumps or falls, the Canon 6D2's bayonet can withstand the weight of the 70-200, and I've also seen the 6D2 set with a super-cannon photographer, but also in the use of no problem.

In fact, we do not have to take the camera as a "pet" care, it is not so delicate.

Although the 70-200 lens is heavy, it is not so heavy as to break the camera's mount, and if it did, it would be recalled by the manufacturer or cause a large number of returns.

Cameras are for photographers, especially DSLRs, which are still very sturdy and resistant compared to micros, etc.

Finally, the 70-200 lens is very heavy.

Finally, I wish you good use of your equipment, and shoot excellent works.

These are my opinions.

Sword Dance Images, western photography enthusiasts, welcome to pay attention

Canon 6d2 with a 70200 lens can the snap hold up?

This type of problem rats brother also often encountered some novice photographer friend asked many times, my point of view is as follows:

1, if it is the f/4 aperture version of the EF70-200mm lens, you can completely rest assured.

Because Canon EF70-200mm f/4.0 specifications of the three lenses are "lightweight" lens, the heaviest "small white 2 generation" is only 820 grams, your 6D2 with this lens, do not need to worry about the mount of the The strength of the mount is not a problem.

2. If it's a 70-200 lens with an f/2.8 aperture, it's best to hold it in both hands.

Canon EF70-200mm f/2.8 specifications of the lens, before and after a **** 4 products, the lightest 1350 grams, and the heaviest nearly 1500 grams, each of which is a "big guy". If you don't have a "two-handed grip" on a lens like this, the force on the bayonet is relatively large.

For example, the following female photographer, her camera with the EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II lens, did not use the lens tripod ring, but directly with the body mounting plate, the use of this is not reasonable. Once encountering accidental bumps and such, the bayonet is easily deformed and damaged.

In general, I recommend that photographers use lenses that weigh more than 3 pounds, and try to hold them in both hands. When not in use, try to keep the lens facing downwards to reduce the force on the bayonet.

Don't worry about it at all, that's how I use it: Canon 6D2 with a white rabbit, and I basically use it as a pendant head (because I usually shoot more portraits), and it's been like that for more than two years now, with no problems, and I've never even worried about it.

Canon's 6D2, as a full-frame DSLR, is not as good as the 1D and 5D series, but it is also one of Canon's high-end series of DSLRs, and its quality is still relatively good.

The 6D2 body is made of a plastic casing with a metal body structure, which, to use an inappropriate analogy, is somewhat similar to reinforced concrete, with an all-metal skeleton, and the lens mount is directly attached to the metal skeleton, so the strength is still guaranteed, and even if it's just another 2X magnifier, there won't be any problems.

In addition, the 70-200 lens mount is also a metal structure, the strength is not a problem, so just rest assured that the use of it, even if you use to want to change the machine or lens, your camera and lens mount will not have the slightest deformation, provided, of course, that you do not fall.

Clearly, it's too much to worry about! In absolute terms, the camera's lens mount must be bad all the time, but you have to pay attention to how long it will be bad, use a decade or two before it may be bad, then you're not just overthinking it? There is no problem at all!