Assessment content:
(1) In accordance with the accreditation of inspection and testing organizations accreditation guidelines for assessment of the provisions of the requirements of the assessment of my center, focusing on the assessment of address changes related to environmental conditions and instrumentation to confirm compliance.
(2) By reviewing the quality records of the center, the center's management system to evaluate the effectiveness of the operation.
(3) Evaluated the competence of 30 parameters in 4 categories applied by our center, focusing on the evaluation of the confirmation of the competence of the items affected by the environment and equipment.
(4) Selected some items for on-site testing and evaluation.
(5) On-site assessment of authorized signatories.
Evaluation process:
Visited the laboratory of our center and its testing facilities, checked the facilities and environmental conditions of the laboratory, verified the equipment of testing instruments and equipment, calibration marking and its use records, etc. **** Checked 10 records of the use of the instrument and 12 files of the instrument and equipment.
Through observation, questions and on-site tests, we examined the qualification conditions, organizational structure and personnel capacity of our center, *** accessed 6 technical files of the relevant management and testing personnel, and verified the personnel's licensed status. Examined the quality system operation and quality control of the results of our center, etc., and inspected 5 copies of quality management system documents and quality control plans and their operation records. Checked the original records 10 and test reports *** 4, verified the declaration of the test items and the corresponding standards 3 .
On-site arrangements for 4 categories of 9 parameters of the test assessment, the assessment of the five participants, the experimental content of the blind sample assessment, on-site testing, on-site witnessing and other forms of assessment projects covering all areas, involving parameters accounted for the declaration of the total number of parameters of 30%. The management and testing personnel were interviewed on quality system documents, standards and testing methods. Two authorized signatories were assessed on site.
Results of the evaluation:
1. Organizational aspects: our center has a clear legal status, the organizational structure is basically sound, the quality system has been established in accordance with the requirements of the evaluation guidelines, and the quality system is basically running normally. Preparation of the quality manual, program documents, operating instructions and other quality system documents to meet the needs of the testing work. There are measures to ensure third-party impartiality of the testing organization.
2. Personnel: my center was built in June 2006, the existing staff of 14, of which 4 managers, testing/inspection staff 8, 2 others. Office and testing laboratory for fixed assets, an area of about 496 square meters. Detectors understand the relevant requirements of the testing standards, the main instruments and equipment operating norms, the development of personnel training programs and the establishment of personnel technical files, testing personnel and management personnel to basically meet the requirements of the testing work carried out at present.
3. Instrumentation and testing sites: Our center has 37 sets of instruments and equipment (sets), instrumentation and equipment to basically meet the scope of its application for accreditation testing requirements, the establishment of instrumentation files, laboratory environmental conditions and facilities to meet the current testing requirements.
4. Detection of the basis: I declared the certification of the center of the testing method standards, are national standards, industry standards, the latest version of the effective version.
5. Quality management system document review and operational compliance review results: our center in May 2016 issued and implemented the B/0 0th revised "Quality Manual" and other quality system documents, in March 2017 to revise the quality manual, procedure documents involving address changes in the relevant content. Management system document elements are set up appropriately, description is more adequate, there is no obvious contradiction between the relevant content of the program documents, and the development of appropriate guidance, operability, the control requirements of the elements basically meet the provisions of the guidelines. 2016 May review review so far, *** implementation of 8 outgoing training, to participate in the inter-laboratory comparison 1 time 2 projects, the results of 1 good, 1 excellent. 2016 May measurement accreditation on-site re-examination review of the 11 rectification items proposed has been carried out on time; February 2017 were carried out a complete internal audit and management review, proposed non-conformity or improvement recommendations, according to the required time for rectification, measures are basically effective, the establishment of a continuous improvement mechanism is basically effective. Internal personnel training was conducted to carry out quality supervision, quality control and other activities. At the same time, the center has established a quality management system of self-improvement mechanism, testing instruments and equipment in basically good condition, the traceability of the basic clear path, a variety of quality activities are basically in a state of control, the quality of the system operation is basically effective, to meet the requirements of the guidelines.
6. On-site assessment: on-site testing of nine items, the results of all qualified; two authorized signatory assessment qualified.
7. Assessment of the conformity of the provisions of the evaluation guidelines: the assessment of the requirements of the evaluation guidelines against the six aspects of 50, of which there are 41 items in line with the basic conformity of 7 items, 2 items do not meet.
8. Proposed approval of the inspection and testing capabilities: the evaluation team recommended approval of the qualification project **** 4 categories of 30 projects.
Finally, the evaluation team passed the city monitoring center laboratory accreditation address change on-site review. Municipal monitoring center will be in accordance with the provisions of the "Accreditation Review Guidelines for Testing and Inspection Agencies", to further strengthen the quality of testing and quality management and quality supervision, continuous improvement of the quality management system, and constantly improve the level of quality management and testing technology, to ensure that the timeliness of testing data and reports, accuracy and scientific.