Not a marketing gimmick. The first thing you need to do is to get your hands on some of the most popular products in the world, and then you can get your hands on some of the most popular products in the world. The "drinkable oxygen" is actually the use of photochemistry, but in fact, as early as 2011, there is called "Oxygen Classic TM Oxygen Spring Oxygenated Water" "oxygen beverage "
Drinkable Oxygen has become famous.
A health drink containing high oxygen preparation method, characterized by: the oxygen by high oxygen liquid therapy instrument activation, oxygen 2 liters / minute into the pure water, 20 minutes so that the oxygen partial pressure of pure water up to 80kPa above the distribution in the can that is high oxygen pure water.
On the technology itself, the injection of oxygen into the aqueous solution, so that the oxygen content of the aqueous solution to increase, up to 0.9% will become a high oxygen aqueous solution or high oxygen injection. Some media on the question: this is the old technology revitalization, or the new owner to take the opportunity to speculate. The preparation into a beverage or pure water, that is "oxygenated beverage" or "oxygenated pure water", also "can drink". Under normal circumstances, breathing oxygen to become liquid, need to be pressurized or cooled , gaseous oxygen at atmospheric pressure at minus 183 ℃ into liquid oxygen . Obviously, drinkable oxygen wouldn't simply be oxygen, but an oxygen solution that infuses more oxygen into a solvent of some sort.
But hyperoxygenated liquids are only for patients, and specific patients at that, not for people in general. To think that you can "drink" a dozen just because you're oxygen-deprived is clearly a misperception. It is important to be aware that there are already such drinks being marketed under the banner of hyperoxia care. This is a kind of misleading. "Drinkable oxygen" drinks are not only unhelpful to normal people, but harmful. In the end, this kind of high oxygen liquid "deification" propaganda, society should pay more attention, the regulatory side should also be included in the line of sight.