Differences between urban and rural areas

In order to be unbiased, we will compare the following aspects of urban and rural areas. I. Public **** infrastructure. Roads, bridges, buildings, communications, electricity, shopping malls, transportation and amusement facilities, from the point of view of there is little difference; in terms of design, scale, quality and variety, although the gap between the city and the countryside is narrowing, but the former is far better than the latter. II. Education, health, housing and employment. Universities are mainly concentrated in the cities, and the universalization of nine-year primary and secondary education is consistent, but there is a clear gap in terms of teacher qualifications, equipment, school buildings, and quality of teaching, with the cities superior and the villages inferior. As for high school and university enrollment rates, they are much higher in the cities than in the countryside. Large hospitals, good doctors, sophisticated equipment converge in the city, both urban and rural areas have medical insurance, the gap is gradually narrowing, but the difficulty of seeing a doctor is still the main focus in the countryside. Rural housing, per capita area is wider than the city, in terms of quality, the city is good, the countryside is poor. In terms of ecology, the rural areas in the "two rivers and one river" basin are seriously polluted, while other areas are generally better than the towns. The employment situation is grim. The employment rate in the city is high and stable, while the employment rate in the countryside is low and highly mobile. In particular, the financial crisis in 2009 caused a large number of unemployed migrant workers in export-oriented enterprises. In addition, long-distance traveling, inconvenient accommodation, limited skills, low culture, and underdeveloped local economy have exacerbated the difficulties of migrant workers' employment. On a larger scale, the countryside is densely populated with little land, and there is a lack of industrial resources and conditions for large-scale automated production, thus widening the employment distance. To a lesser extent, the low degree of modernization of agricultural farming, low profits, subject to the influence of nature, information is relatively more than the plug, surplus labor force is also more. Third, the spiritual realm. The city has entered a fast-paced, interdependent, personalized life times, open-mindedness, tolerance, high tension, relatively high pressure, greater personal space, yearning for nature, the pursuit of a spiritual life colorful world. Of course, the drawbacks of industrialization have also begun to emerge quietly in the city. The countryside is in a time of plenty of time, self-sufficiency, migration and return, maintaining local customs, and living in harmony with nature and neighbors. The three festivals of the lunar calendar, in particular, continue millennia of tradition, with frequent group activities. Freedom of thought is great, the realm of uneven, openness and closedness coexist, wealth and poverty go hand in hand, both want to maintain an idyllic life, but also want to go to the exciting and varied spiritual life. Taken as a whole, and comparing the two, the gap exists, but there are advantages and disadvantages to life in the city and the countryside. In the next two decades, the State will step up its efforts and introduce a series of policies to narrow the gap between urban and rural areas. With the material and spiritual life of urban and rural areas continue to improve, I believe that the divine land is more equal, exudes a more colorful life characteristics, heaven and earth is full of harmony. The answer is simple and please adopt.