Risks of Laboratory Instruments and Equipment
1. Instruments and equipment that have influence on each other are placed together and interfere with each other, resulting in inaccurate data;
2. Instruments and equipment that have not been calibrated/checked for a long time, resulting in inaccuracy;
3. Instruments and equipment that do not have periodical checks, resulting in uncontrolled performance;
4. Instruments and equipment that do not have status labels or labels in a confusing manner, resulting in easy misuse;
5. Instruments and equipment without safety protection equipment, resulting in safety risks to the operator;
6. Instruments and equipment without safety protection equipment, safety risks to the operator;
6. Gas cylinders are not classified storage, no fixed and leak-proof facilities, there is a potential risk of explosion;
7. Instrumentation and equipment cross the messy gas line, there is a potential risk of fire;
8. Instrumentation and equipment use of the lack of records, the emergence of abnormalities can not be traced;
9. Instrumentation and equipment files are not recorded, and there is no way to trace back;
10. p>9. Incomplete information on the files of instruments and equipment, causing trouble for maintenance;
10. No strong exhaust device for instruments and equipment, which is harmful to the operators.
Risks of environmental control in the laboratory
1. No temperature and humidity meter between the operation room and the instrument room, and the experimental environmental conditions are unclear;
2. No "three wastes" collection and treatment device, posing a threat to the environment;
3. The room walls are peeling off, and the floor is rough, with sundry things lying around. Table clutter, poor environmental sensory, there is a risk of dust contamination experiments;
4. Laboratory without forced ventilation, no fire, water, corrosion and first aid facilities, there is a risk of personal safety;
5. Waste and long-term out-of-use equipment has not been cleared out of the testing site, there is a risk of misuse;
6. Testing work without records of the environmental conditions, the results of the test can not be reproduced;
7. 7. Microbiology laboratory logistics and human flow are not separated, the first, second and third shifts are not standardized, there is a risk of cross-contamination;
8. Pathogenic microorganisms laboratory without biosafety devices, there is a risk of pathogenic infection of the operator;
9. Mutually shadowed workspace is not effectively isolated, affecting the accuracy of test results;
10. Office, testing room, Instrument room mixed, mutual cross-contamination, there are safety hazards and risk of result accuracy.?
Laboratory standards and standard substances are at risk
1. Standards have no controlled number, the standard change can not be fully traced after the change, there is a risk of misuse of obsolete standards;
2. Standards for a long time without checking the new, the standard abolition of the new issue does not grasp, there is a risk of misuse of obsolete standards;
3. Obsolete standards are not retrieved or not stamped "cost". The old standards are not recovered or not stamped with the "cost" chapter, there is the possibility of misuse;
4. Currently valid standards have not purchased the official board, there is the possibility of textual errors;
5. The new standards have no record of publicizing, can not ensure that all relevant personnel to accurately grasp;
6. The new standards to enable the lack of approval procedures and records, the person in charge of technical Responsibility is not in place;
7. Standard substances and other reagents mixed storage, there is a risk of cross-contamination;
8. Standard substances without period verification records, the standard quality is not in control of the test results have an impact;
9. Standard substances can not be certified, the quality of the standard is not guaranteed, there is a risk of distortion of the results;
10. Storage of the standard substances in volumetric flasks. There is a risk of decreased measurement accuracy.?
Laboratory chemicals and consumables problems?
1. There is no list of qualified suppliers, and the quality of consumables is not guaranteed;
2. Poisonous drugs have not realized double locking and use tracking and supervision system, and there is a risk of leakage of poisonous drugs;
3. Perishable drugs have not realized double locking, and there is a risk of leakage of perishable drugs;
4. There is no log-in record of the use of reagents, and the management of reagents is not in place.
5. Reagent storage and operation room in the same room, harmful to the health of inspectors;
6. Reagent bottle labeling information is not enough, the reagents expired without control;
7. Standard reagent preparation is not carried out in constant temperature and humidity conditions, the gauge heat up and cold shrinkage, the standard solution can not be aligned;
8. Bulk purchases or large amounts of reagents are not re-examined and verified. Failure of reagents will cause huge losses;
9. Consumables quality without risk analysis and assessment, unqualified consumables will cause huge losses;
10. Reagents are not categorized and stored, there is a risk of cross-contamination, reagent room or reagent cabinets without forced exhaust facilities, the health of the operator is detrimental to the...
This is the first time in the laboratory that the reagents have been used in the laboratory.
Top ten problems in laboratory sample management
1. Sample numbering is confusing, there is no uniform and unique number, easy to confuse;
2. There is no description of the status of the sample and risk evaluation when receiving samples, and the results cannot be traced back to the abnormal results;
3. There is no flow of samples card, and the responsibility for the samples is not clear;
4. Samples have no status marking of the sample to be examined, examined and retained, and there is no identification of the status of the sample to be examined, examined and retained, which is harmful to the health of the operators, Samples without pending, in the test, self-test and retained samples state identification, there is the possibility of missed and re-test;
5. Samples and retained samples without classification storage and monitoring, there is a risk of cross-contamination and mold;
6. Recovery and disposal of samples after the test is not standardized, the responsibility of the technical person in charge of the failure to put in place;
7. Sample room and office mixed, there is a risk of safety;
8. Sample processing room mixed with the testing room, there is a risk of cross-contamination Sample processing room and testing room are mixed, there is a risk of cross-contamination;
9. Sample storage without environmental monitoring records, there is a risk of sample damage;
10. Sample collection process is not representative of the ominous sampling records, affecting the results of testing.
Ten major problems in laboratory personnel management
1. Key personnel without appointment documents, unclear authority;
2. Inspection projects without personnel induction certificate, the ability to not confirm;
3. Various types of personnel positions cross, unclear job responsibilities;
4. Key personnel without supervision plans or records, monitoring is not in place;
5. p>
5. Technical and management personnel without training programs or records, skills can not be continuously improved;
6. Personnel technical files and personnel files confused, inaccurate understanding of the guidelines;
7. Authorized forensic title and qualifications do not meet the requirements, can not serve as the post;
8. Technical responsible person's job title and qualifications do not meet the requirements, can not serve as the post;
9. Testing personnel without large equipment operating license, the equipment and results of the degree of unfavorable;
10. Personnel studied and engaged in the profession is too large a cross-section of the profession, must be continued education and assessment.?
Ten major problems in the laboratory test report
1. Insufficient information in the report does not meet the requirements of the Guidelines;
2. Incorrect conclusions of the report, the responsibility of the authorized signatory is not in place;
3. Inconsistency between the report data and the original records, the report reviewer's responsibility is not in place;
4. Report without three levels of approval and signatures, report Management chaos;
5. Report format changes, not serious and prudent;
6. Report stamped in the "inspection and testing seal" does not meet the "Guidelines" requirements, must be replaced;
7. Report no riding seal, there is a risk that the report switched the inside cover;
8. Report or Original records have irregular alterations, by the possibility of forgery;
9. Can not distinguish the difference between the inspection report, test report, appraisal report;
10. The report of the sending procedures are not strictly enforced, there is a risk of confidentiality.
Answers from