Evaluation methods and standards of government procurement samples

Legal analysis: the importance of samples in bid evaluation methods varies from project to project, and the setting of sample scores should also vary from project to project. For example, in some projects, samples only play an auxiliary role, and the focus is on the evaluation of the bidder's technical scheme, product brand, performance and other contents. The sample score should not be set too high, generally not exceeding10% of the total score; For office furniture, clothing procurement and other projects, samples are an important basis for bid evaluation, and a relatively high score can be set, accounting for 10%-30% of the total score, which is reasonable.

Legal basis: Article 2 of the People's Republic of China (PRC) Government Procurement Law applies to government procurement in People's Republic of China (PRC). The term "government procurement" as mentioned in this Law refers to the use of financial funds by state organs, institutions and organizations at all levels to purchase goods, projects and services within the centralized procurement catalogue formulated according to law or above the procurement quota standard. The catalogue of centralized government procurement and the standard of procurement quota shall be formulated in accordance with the authority prescribed in this Law. The term "procurement" as mentioned in this Law refers to the behavior of obtaining goods, projects and services for compensation through contracts, including purchase, lease, entrustment and employment. "Goods" as mentioned in this Law refers to articles in various forms and types, including raw materials, fuels, equipment and products. The term "project" as mentioned in this Law refers to construction projects, including new construction, reconstruction, expansion, decoration, demolition and repair of buildings and structures. The term "services" as mentioned in this Law refers to other government procurement objects except goods and projects.