Second, explain the historical materials and prove which key points of this topic have been proved.
Three, put forward their own consent or new proof, and prove it.
4. What are the possible problems and what are the refutations with your evidence?
5. Compare your argument with the rebuttal argument to prove your rationality.
The above are the main points of feasibility analysis, followed by format typesetting and data citation.
Feasibility analysis is to investigate, analyze and compare the main contents and supporting conditions of the project, such as market demand, resource supply, construction scale, process route, equipment selection, environmental impact, fund raising and profitability. And predict the possible financial, economic benefits and social and environmental impact after the completion of the project, so as to put forward suggestions on whether the project is worth investing and how to carry out construction, and provide basis for project decision-making. Feasibility analysis should be predictable, fair, reliable and scientific.
main content
1. Conduct comprehensive and in-depth market analysis and forecast. Investigate and predict the supply and demand situation and sales price of the products of the proposed project in the domestic and foreign markets; Study the target market of products and analyze the market share; Study and determine the market, mainly the advantages and disadvantages of product competitors and their own competitiveness, as well as the marketing strategy of products, and study and determine the main market risks and risk levels.
2. For resource development projects, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research to determine the available amount, natural quality, occurrence conditions and development and utilization value of resources.
3. In-depth project construction scheme design, including: project construction scale and product scheme, project site selection, process technology scheme and main equipment scheme, main materials and auxiliary materials, environmental impact issues, energy saving and water saving, organization and human resource allocation of the project, project schedule, detailed estimation of required investment, financing analysis, financial analysis, national economic evaluation, social evaluation, project uncertainty analysis, risk analysis and comprehensive evaluation.
The feasibility study of the project is a research process from shallow to deep, from coarse to fine, from front to back, and repeated optimization. The preliminary research is to create conditions for more accurate research and questions in the later stage. The feasibility study should accurately implement all business risks, technical risks and profit risks. If a defect is found through research, the main risk reasons should be found through the disclosure of sensitivity parameters, and better alternatives should be found from the aspects of marketing, product and scale, process technology, raw material route, equipment scheme and public auxiliary facilities scheme to improve the feasibility of the project. If all schemes are optimized repeatedly and the project is still not feasible, the reasons should be explained in the research document. However, it should be noted that even if the research results are not feasible, this research is still valuable because it avoids the abuse and waste of funds.
In addition to the above-mentioned project feasibility study, we also have a kind of research closely related to investment in practice, called thematic research, which mainly creates conditions for feasibility study (or preliminary feasibility study), studies and solves some key or specific problems, and is the premise and auxiliary of feasibility study. Thematic studies are classified as follows:
A. Product market research: investigation, analysis and prediction of market demand and price, research on product's ability to enter the market, expected market penetration and competition, research on product's marketing strategy and competitive countermeasures, etc.
B. Research on raw materials and inputs: including current and future sources and supplies of basic raw materials and inputs, and price trends.
C. Special research on laboratory and intermediate tests: determine the applicability of certain raw materials or products and the test and test degree required for their technical and economic indicators.
D. Study on plant area and site selection: combining industrial layout, regional economy, internal and external construction conditions, supply conditions of production materials, etc. Study and select the factory and site.
E. Research on economies of scale: Usually, it is conducted as an integral part of process selection research. When the problem is limited to economies of scale and does not involve a variety of complex processes, the main task of this study is to evaluate the economies of scale of the factory, comprehensively consider the available process technology, investment, cost, price, benefit and market demand, and choose the best production scale.
F process selection research: analyze, study and evaluate the advancement, applicability, reliability and economy of various possible production technologies, especially when adopting new technologies.
G. equipment selection ... >>
Question 2: Feasibility analysis of thesis opening report How to write the graduation thesis opening report and how to write it?
First, how to choose the question
What haunts me together is the repeated questioning of the tutor during the more than one year of writing the thesis opening report.
A question: "What's your puzzle?" How many times have I answered "My question is, China's?
Why can't the semiconductor industry develop? "The teacher with its unique savings to ask questions, just laughed. I am very annoyed in my heart.
Fire and regret: what's wrong with such a simple truth and such an obvious answer? !
The secret lies in the "level" of asking questions. Different from policy research reports, academic articles gather theoretical aspects and solutions.
Solve theoretical problems. A theory is a logical system composed of a series of premises and terms. Theories in specific fields have their specific generalizations.
Concept, category and research paradigm. Only under the same concepts, perspectives and paradigms can theories talk; Only through the right
Words, theory can develop. Few master's and doctoral dissertations create new theories, which is of course the best, but it is difficult.
Most of us have developed on the basis of existing theories, so when asking questions, we should be "experts" to understand.
Terms and clear logic to express. Look at my initial question, "Why can't China's semiconductor industry develop?"
This is only an exploration of phenomena, not a theoretical proposition to be verified. My theoretical proposition is: "China's industrial policy.
Is the process an elite-led knowledge process? In this proposition, "policy process", "elite politics" and "* * * knowledge.
The three terms "appeal" outline the theoretical scope and perspective of the study.
Secondly, multiple-choice questions are a process of "peeling bamboo shoots". Theoretical problems are always hidden in complex reality.
Behind it, and discovering theoretical problems requires the ability to use theoretical thinking. The training of theoretical thinking is a long-term accumulation
Process. However, novices need not be discouraged. Generally speaking, they can be divided into "three steps": the first step is to define a "xing"
Interest range ",such as semiconductor industry, information industry, rural medical care, higher education system, etc. , and browse the relevant media extensively.
Reports, * * * documents and academic articles, and find the "sticking point" or "hot spot" among them. The second step is to summarize the previous research.
Generally speaking, what theoretical perspective is used to analyze the "crux" or "hot spot" and what theoretical tools are used, such as public finance.
Perspective, social conflict paradigm, etc. The third step is to investigate the feasibility of the problem, that is, our own research space and research.
Feasibility of research. For example, can't western theories explain China's problems? Or can the same question be used in different ways?
Theory to explain? Or is the premise and logical deduction of the theory itself flawed? By answering these questions, I
Students find their own foothold in research. However, we should also pay attention to whether it is possible to complete our research within one or two years.
Become? Is data acquisition feasible? Wait a minute.
Finally, how to state the problem? In essence, stating the problem is the process of condensing the core idea. Views should come from the present.
Think and sum up practical problems, rather than "cutting feet and fitting shoes" in order to establish a theory. Political, Economic and Social Development in China
How to express a dynamic and rich scene with appropriate terms and accurate logic? ambitious
Beginners often come up with grand concepts or frameworks, but my suggestion is to narrow the scope of research as much as possible and clarify the research objects.
So as to clarify the memory logic of the object and ensure the completion of standard learning in a limited time.
Surgical paper. For example, "China semiconductor industry policy research" is a very vague statement, we can look at it from several aspects.
Short title: (1) time: from 1980 to 2000; (2) Objective: * * Rebels and decision-making.
Behavior, not market, enterprise, governance structure, etc. (3) Perspective: elite research in politics and * * * theory; (
4) Case: Project 908, Project 909, Document 13, Electronic Revitalization, which occurred in 1980-
Two major projects and two important documents in the field of semiconductor policy in 2000. With such a clear definition, we will
Focusing on the obvious concepts of "policy process", "elite" and "* * * knowledge", the problem will be solved easily.
Get out. At the same time, the problem is clear, and we have a clear standard when screening information and materials. In this "information"
Redundancy era can greatly improve the research efficiency.
Second, how to do literature review
First of all, we should combine "literature review" with "background description" (>:>
Question 3: How to write the feasibility analysis of the paper? Feasibility analysis can help you write it.
The title of an argumentative essay should conform to the stylistic characteristics and be clear, so that people can know its purpose at a glance. Articles with clear views are most popular with commentators, because it has a clear and transparent sense, can convey the general content of the article, and is easy to grasp the basic content of the whole article.
Question 4: How to write the feasibility demonstration part in the opening report of graduation thesis? Feasibility analysis should be what methods and means you will use to complete your research, so the content should have research methods and steps.
Question 5: How to write the feasibility of the paper? I will write it. Do you need any help? In the process of writing a thesis, the tutor usually asks the students to write an outline. As far as the writing procedure is concerned, it is a necessary preparation for the author before writing; As far as the outline itself is concerned, it is the concrete embodiment of the author's thoughts and articles.
Question 6: How to write the feasibility analysis of the paper in the opening report? Feasibility analysis should be what methods and means you will use to complete your research, so the content should have research methods and steps.
Question 7: Feasibility analysis of the introduction part of the paper How to write the introduction is the chapter before the text "chapter". The writing of the preface should include the research summary, and put forward the research scope and viewpoints of my thesis. 1. research summary writing a graduation thesis must have a research summary, also called a summary report. The research summary is to sort out the history, present situation and development trend of the research object of this paper, and to evaluate these studies. Determine the logical starting point of your own research and discuss what you want to do on the basis of others' research. In the dissertation I reviewed, the main problems in the research summary are too brief and lack of analysis and evaluation. Some just list other people's research works, without any analysis, and replace their own summaries with article lists. Some research reviews account for half of the whole paper, replacing their own views with reviews. 2. In addition to writing a summary of the research, the preface of the research point of view should also state your own research point of view, what problems to discuss and what opinions to put forward in the paper. Define the key words related to the viewpoint of the paper, what scope I discuss this problem and how to use this viewpoint. In this way, you can make your point clear, get to the point, and others can understand. It also avoids the ambiguity of discussion scope and keywords. The content of the preface should be clear, preferably with chapter titles. 3. General description of the research content. Generally speaking, the analysis method of dissertations follows two procedures, one is the logical analysis procedure: "analysis-synthesis", and the other is the system synthesis procedure: "synthesis-analysis-synthesis". I think it is best to adopt a systematic and comprehensive procedure, which has the function of establishing a strategic plan and outlining an outline. The first "synthesis" of the comprehensive program is the preface, which regards the research object as a synthesis and gives a general description of its own views. "Analysis" is to discuss each part from different angles on the basis of synthesis, and the results of each analysis are fed back to the next level of synthesis. The following "synthesis" is in the conclusion part of the paper, summarizing the research of the whole paper and summarizing my own thesis views. Therefore, the preface puts forward its own research point of view, which needs to further elaborate its research content as a whole, that is, to describe its discussion content systematically as a whole. This general description is equivalent to the abstract of the paper. It is convenient for readers to grasp the viewpoints and contents of their papers at a glance. This is also to prepare for the discussion in the first chapter. Perhaps some classmates will say that I have already talked about my research content in the abstract of the paper, and there is no need to talk about it in the preface. The two are different. The preface belongs to the main body of the paper and gives a comprehensive description of our research content. Readers don't have to read your abstract, but they must read your text. If you don't give a general description of your research content in the preface, you will miss an opportunity to let readers know the general appearance of your paper and increase the difficulty for readers to understand your paper. You make readers confused and can't find out what your point of view is for a long time. Readers may be unwilling or impatient if they don't understand.