The netizens think that this result is very fair and just, but also let the whole industry for the purging, so that professional counterfeiters will not be so rampant. The court found that the counterfeiter had subjective malice, and also concealed some facts in the course of the lawsuit, and ruled against him. This is actually the result of the 2nd deliberation, in the 1st time, the court awarded the woman to compensate the counterfeiter 10 times the amount. After that the woman appealed, and the end result was just better together with the 2nd and also final judgment that the counterfeiter could not go back to appeal.
We all say that the law is very fair, but sometimes if there is no corresponding evidence, it may also make the judge has no way to make a correct judgment. For example, in this case, the counterfeiter posed as a fellow villager in Handan and bought a lot of cooked food like the woman and paid a deposit of more than 3,000 yuan. However, after receiving the products, the hometown exposed his true colors and not only demanded 10 times the compensation from the merchant, but also refused to return the products. The woman is just a job in the village, the personnel usually will do their own job well, and then help folks to buy some things. As a result of its being counterfeiting people aimed at the helpless to fight a lawsuit.
In the first trial, because of the epidemic the woman did not participate, so it was ruled a loss. In fact, it is also a common practice of the court, as long as one party did not attend, then it will be awarded to the party who attended the case. However, both parties are able to follow up with a second appeal, and the woman provided the appropriate evidence that the man was fishing society counterfeiting. At the time of purchase from the production of the goods for the goods is already very well known, and this is a bulk food, and not the kind of pre-prepared food. The counterfeiter, as an adult, should have known whether the product had expired or not, and could not know certain facts and still choose to go for compensation.
In this case, the professional counterfeiter is just a profit maker, not a consumer at all, and such dishonest counterfeiting will also make the market more confusing. Solely in the end, the counterfeiter lost the case, and also need to bear the cost of acceptance of the case.