I have a friend who is the owner of a construction company. He recently participated in a bidding project. In addition to them, a small company that was just established also received a bidding invitation. According to the analysis, the comprehensive level of that small company was far inferior to theirs. My friend had a chance to win, but in the end, it was that small company that won the bid. My friend thought that he might have won the bid because the small company's quotation was lower than his. After asking around, he found that the small company's quotation was not lower than his, but because the owner of the small company was the bidding manager. nephew. Knowing this news, my friend was very angry and helpless. In such a corrupt environment, not only him, but many bidders have experienced such experiences.
Today, the editor will show you 5 tricky phenomena in tendering, so be careful.
Special customization
As we all know, after the pre-qualification of the bidding unit, several bidding units will be determined and an inspection group will be organized to inspect the units that intend to participate in the bidding. Each bidding unit mobilized a large number of people, received them warmly, and spent money. In fact, the bidding unit had already identified an interested unit before the inspection, and "tailor-made" terms with obvious tendencies for the intended unit based on its corporate characteristics, award-winning quotations, construction technical plans and other factors. This bid control.
Create time difference
In the name of grabbing time, regardless of reality, the bidding unit deliberately shortened the deadline for purchasing bids or bidding deadlines, and arranged the deadline for purchasing bids in the announcement The next day, most competitive companies were unable to participate in the purchase. Only those companies that have a relationship with the owner can respond freely because they have obtained the information in advance. Those who do not know the inside information may give up or have their bids scrapped due to lack of time.
Change the judging rules at will
For example, if a project is invited to bid, a company should be the winning bidder based on its technical bid, commercial bid and on-site defense. However, in order to let the interested units win the bid, many bidding units will change the evaluation rules at will, conduct closed bid evaluation, and replace the winning bidder with the interested unit.
Special treatment
Some review experts clearly know that they have a direct interest in the bidders but do not actively avoid them. In order to win the bid, some bidders will make some special marks in the bidding documents, so that the review experts will give special treatment to the bidders when scoring.
Using administrative measures to default on project payments
After the bidding project is completed, some places are unwilling to pay the remaining balance of the project in full, so they will invite the local audit bureau to re-audit the executed contract. , the audit result is often "the contract signing unit has priced too high, XX fees should be reduced, etc." According to the local audit decision, the construction party not only cannot get the balance, but also has to refund the money.
That’s it for today. I hope that bid evaluation experts and bidding parties can maintain justice and fairness and purify the bidding market environment.
For more information about engineering/service/purchasing tender document writing and production to improve the bid winning rate, you can click on the official website customer service at the bottom for free consultation: /#/?source=bdzd