Question 2: The Philippines anti-drug killed how many people The Philippines anti-drug is not to kill how many people triggered by the controversy, but he did not go through the legal process at all on the killings, as when our country Yan \ Fight, in fact, to a certain extent, and now the Philippines is similar to the situation, no matter whether it is a good or a bad wrongful conviction of a person certainly will not be a few. But anti-drugs believe that it will only be a matter of time, after achieving results, should shift policy.
Question 3: What do Filipinos think of the President's anti-drug? From the available news, most Filipinos should be supportive with acquiescence. Don't forget that the President of the Philippines is also running for office, so the President tends not to do things against the people's will
Question 4: The latest news on the anti-drug campaign in the Philippines, is there a death penalty in Philippine law? There is no death penalty in Philippine law at the moment. The Philippines abolished the death penalty in 1987 by Mrs. Aquino (the mother of former President Aquino III), and reinstated it 90 years later. Mrs. Arroyo imposed a moratorium on the death penalty when she took office, and then abolished it in 2007, and hasn't reinstated it yet.
Question 5: Is there any precedent for anti-drugs like in the Philippines? Back then, our country's crackdown was in fact similar to the current situation in the Philippines to a certain extent. Just do not allow the people to lynch. Anti-drug believe that it will only be a matter of time, after achieving results, it should change the policy.
Question 6: How does the Philippines balance human rights and anti-drugs Didn't read this. Guess, the introduction of foreign capital (Chinese capital) for infrastructure construction, transportation, water and electricity, housing, industrial and agricultural infrastructure equipment, medical equipment and technology, advanced technology in various industries, regulate social order, etc., to improve the living environment, the development of tourism, the development of productive forces, increase employment and income. As society progresses, human rights are extended and guaranteed.
Question 7: The Philippine "war on drugs, kill no amnesty", in the end, how the decree is finally out of the President's direct jurisdiction before the Philippine warlords divided Which people listen to him? Don't think of every country as a highly centralized country like China, the Philippines is only nominally united, this populist decree on the surface is tough, but in fact not only killed people, but also completely destroyed the rule of law and the spirit of the rule of law, the decree is essentially just a political means to take advantage of the people's populist style to enhance their own political prestige, poor Filipino people
Question 8: Why the European Union and the United States always duty
The Philippines violently anti-narcotics First, because they don't have the power to do so. The Philippines violent anti-drug First, because they have not read the book of sages, do not know what is called "chaotic times with heavy punishment".
Second, the United States has always been the Philippines to fight against China, and now the new President of the Philippines to change the policy, intends to make friends with China, caused the United States dissatisfaction, deliberately looking for excuses to blame.
Question 9: Why did Obama intervene in the Philippine anti-drug campaign? Outsiders say one reason is that the Philippines anti-drug extrajudicial shooting of suspects does not respect human rights. The United States will often see the road to pull out the knife to help
Question 10: Why our country can not be like Duterte anti-drug When our country cracked down, in fact, to some extent, and now the Philippines is similar to the situation. Just do not allow the people to lynch. Anti-drug I believe it will only be a matter of time, and after the results are achieved, there should be a shift in policy.