Can a different diagnosis and medical history be used for a claim? Can be modified?

Medical record is only a record of the patient's medical history, Bunsen is only a record of the medical history. Should be based on the diagnosis certificate issued by the medical institution to do out as the basis for theory. The two content is not the same not must repair must, should be diagnosis as the basis for determining the facts.

First, the applicant provides medical records can not replace the medical institutions should issue a diagnosis certificate. In practice, the claim is based on the post-injury diagnostic certificate issued by the medical institution, rather than ordinary medical records.

The second diagnostic certificate refers to the medical unit issued by the medical documents with certain legal effect, is as one of the judicial appraisal, retirement due to illness, disability appraisal, insurance claims and other important basis. Ordinary medical records are the sum of words, symbols, charts, images, slides and other information formed by medical personnel in the course of medical activities.

Third, the general medical records and diagnostic proof of inconsistency should be applied to diagnostic proof. General medical records are medical personnel in the process of medical interaction, due to the patient's physical condition, medical equipment, medical personnel professional level, treatment process and other factors, not only the same patient's medical records in different medical institutions may be different, that is, the same patient in the same medical institutions at different times of the medical records may also be different, and thus inconsistent general medical records and diagnostic proof of the case, the practice is inevitable. In practice, it is inevitable. Diagnostic certificate and general medical records belong to the documentary evidence, but from the form of evidence, diagnostic certificate is issued by the medical and health institutions, general medical records are medical personnel signatures issued by the former is better than the latter.

Fourth, both the diagnostic certificate and general medical records, are not the only basis. Out of the diagnosis, but also must be combined with other evidence, only between the evidence to form a more complete chain of evidence, regarded as an investigation to confirm the relevant facts of the service, to determine the facts of the final basis of the evidence and logical reasoning, the burden of proof allocation itself can not solve the problem of determining the facts on the book.