Security assessment report
Security assessment report, the report is increasingly useful, when the higher-ups deployed can be the corresponding work plan, in order to better accomplish the task, generally have to write a report to the higher-ups, reflecting the basic situation in the work. We should avoid excessive length when writing a report. The following is a security assessment report.
Safety Assessment Report 1I. Project Overview
Many newcomers will copy the contents of the project information directly into the report, in fact, this will make the first mistake. Although they are "engineering profile", but different places to use the information is different. In a project file, the project overview is often more detailed, but in a safety assessment report, the focus is on safety issues.
The first is the volume of the project and how it was constructed. This information can determine the safety category of the project and facilitate the assessment. Secondly, there are some basic data, such as the number of building floors, axial distance, elevation and other information, which can reflect the quality of this kind of project is prone to common problems. Finally, there is some information about the participating units and supervisory units, which makes it easy to predict the construction quality.
Second, the engineering safety assessment basis
Here is usually a list of industry standards, it should be noted that the industry standards should be updated in a timely manner, that is, listed in the latest standards, if the standard is not updated in a timely manner, it can not reflect the safety of engineering construction. At the same time to consider the standard to be able to cover the scope of engineering design.
Third, risk analysis
Risk analysis should consider the people, machines, materials, methods, environment and other aspects, and consider the impact of risk-causing factors on the engineering risk. People who may be harmed usually include operators, other people on the same working surface and surrounding people, while the causes of accidents usually include mechanical equipment failure, human error and natural disasters.
Fourth, the scope of safety risk assessment
The scope of safety assessment of the project is not a generalization of the entire scope, but a targeted selection of the project may be the existence of safety risks of the section or scope of the assessment, otherwise it is easy to ignore some of the problems. However, the scope of assessment should also prevent generalization and ignore other possible safety risks.
V. Safety risk assessment methods
Specialized engineering to use specialized evaluation methods. Usually need to introduce the operating conditions of the concept of risk assessment methods and implementation steps for a detailed introduction; after the implementation of the risk assessment method to explain the steps, the design of the formula calculation part of the formula and the meaning of each letter, if necessary, shall be cited in the data table; finally, the special risk assessment.
Sixth, the safety risk level requirements
Here you can list the risk level corresponding to the requirements of the treatment measures, can be reflected in the form of tables. Here should avoid applying the content of other reports, should be prepared according to the characteristics of the project.
VII, determine the level of security risk
Here you need to list the probability of occurrence of risk level and judgment criteria, and then the risk of loss level and judgment criteria.
VIII, engineering safety production comprehensive evaluation opinion
For the overall analysis of the assessment report, the project to give a comprehensive evaluation of safety production opinion. The opinion needs to be refined to the details of each sub-part of the project, and targeted analysis, and finally give an objective safety evaluation. It should be noted that the rating opinion avoids uniformity, and should objectively evaluate the safety problems of different projects, and directly point out the existing risks and problems, which is crucial for the subsequent construction of the project.
Safety Assessment Report 2I. Purpose of the audit
The safety assessment report is the product of the evaluation organization, the evaluation organization must bear the responsibility related to the quality of the product. The quality of the safety evaluation report directly affects the reputation of the evaluation agency, in order to improve the quality of the evaluation report, to achieve evaluation quality standardization, reflecting the safety evaluation process control and quality control, the safety evaluation report must be "report audit"
Second, the audit staff
The reviewers of the evaluation report should at least include a full-time process control officer and a full-time technical officer formally appointed by the evaluation organization, according to the actual situation of the company, the reviewers can be appropriately expanded. Project internal audit, you can ask non-evaluation project personnel to participate in the report audit, process control and technical audit, increase the safety evaluation of the person in charge or the chief engineer report approval, the report is completed and stamped with the official seal of the unit before the increase in the legal representative report issuance, etc.
Third, the scope of the audit
Audit of the person in charge of the process control Scope is the project safety evaluation of the various control processes, including the undertaking of the project risk analysis process, evaluation of the project team to establish the process, the project evaluation plan process, investigation and analysis and site survey process, the project self-examination process.
The audit scope of the technical person in charge of the evaluation is the evaluation of the `technical links, including the evaluation of whether the information is complete, the identification of risk factors are not missing, the evaluation of the content and evaluation methodology is reasonable, the countermeasures or corrective action is targeted, the evaluation of the conclusions are accurate, the format of the report meets the requirements, and so on.
The company should have a report issuance link, the legal representative of the issuance of the audit scope can be determined for the project may lead to legal disputes, the evaluation process whether there is a violation of the law, the project of various types of risk can be afforded to the company, the evaluation of the report of the confidentiality of the correct, and so on.
Fourth, the audit requirements
Auditors should be consistent with the report should be audited, which is the evaluation report can be audited through the basic requirements, less than the basic requirements, the auditor should be returned to the comments and modifications.
Fifth, the audit process
Each step of the audit process is to report the audit of the veto items. Where the requirements are not met, no longer continue to audit, returned after the audit opinion.
Evaluation report before the audit, first check whether the security evaluation process is effectively controlled, each process is whether the evaluation organization full-time process controller to confirm the completion. Against the evaluation contract, check whether the report clearly indicates the evaluation boundaries and the scope of responsibility for evaluation.
Whether the logical structure of the report is coherent, and whether there is no follow-up to the previous proposed, or suddenly appear in the back of the report did not mention the previous content. The report is reviewed according to the core elements of the report review. Audit the traceability of information cited in the report. Review the completeness of the report's annexes. Audit the systematic nature of the report archiving information.
Six, the audit method
The audit of the evaluation report can not stay in the report itself, the more important is the verification of the content, including the expert meeting discussions, on-site verification, verification of the information, methodology and verification of the calculations, in particular, the relevance of the countermeasures and the feasibility of the verification.
Seven, the report audit
The audit of the safety evaluation report is an important link to ensure the quality of safety evaluation. Evaluation report audit is divided into three levels: project self-examination, technical audit, process control audit
1, project self-examination
After the completion of the first draft of the safety evaluation report, in order to reduce the evaluation of individual differences in the evaluation of the quality of the evaluation report, the project leader should be convened to evaluate the evaluation of the project team of all the staff and evaluation of the evaluation of the project team outside the evaluation of the project team. The project leader should call all the personnel of the evaluation project team and the evaluation personnel outside the evaluation project team to participate in the project self-examination meeting, and reflect the behavior of the legal person of the safety evaluation organization with collective wisdom. The project leader presided over the project self-examination meeting.
The project leader is mainly responsible for introducing the project overview and evaluation process, checking the work done by the project team members according to the division of labor, soliciting the opinions of the project team members on whether the report is a true reflection of the status of the evaluation project, confirming the contribution of the project team members to the report, and listening to the evaluation of the project team outside of the evaluator and the experts on the report to the questions and comments.
The main work of the project self-review meeting is to verify the completion of the evaluation project team division of labor, check whether the evaluation process has been confirmed, check whether there are any technical problems in the report, check the format and text of the report, set out the report annexes, and organize the archived information. The content of the project self-audit must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting and serve as the basis for the next step of the audit. There is no project self-examination of the minutes of the meeting, shall not be transferred to the technical audit and process control audit.
2, technical audit
The end of the project self-review and modify the report, the project leader will evaluate the report to the technical person in charge of technical review. The content of the technical audit mainly includes whether the relevant information collected on site is complete and effective, whether the identification of hazardous and harmful factors is sufficient, whether the evaluation method is reasonable, whether the countermeasures are targeted, whether the conclusions are correct, whether the format of the report is standardized, whether there is any error in the text of the report, and to confirm the completeness of the information archived. Project evaluation team according to the technical review of the modified report and retain the draft before modification, after modification, the report must be reported again to the technical review, not through the technical review of the requirements, the technical director shall not sign, without the technical director of the audit signature, the report is not allowed to issue.
3, process control audit
Process control audit is the evaluation of the project in the completion of each process, the project leader will be the evaluation report and process information to the process control person in charge of the process control audit, to confirm the completion of the evaluation process. Evaluation process control audit mainly includes whether the project to undertake risk analysis, whether the preparation of the project implementation plan, whether the site survey, whether the collection of evidence on site, whether the project self-audit, whether the project technical review, evaluation process records are complete, whether to meet the process control requirements.
The evaluation project team should improve the evaluation process according to the process control audit, the process does not meet the requirements, or the process evidence is not sufficient to form a chain of evidence, it should be supplemented in a timely manner and make a statement. Evaluation of the project team according to the process control responsible for the audit comments, supplement the process and obtain evidence, and again reported to the process control audit, without the process control responsible for the audit and signature to confirm the completion of the evaluation process, shall not be entered into the next part of the evaluation process.
Eight, the report issued
Evaluation agency legal representative of the project evaluation report must be issued, can be standardized to the maximum extent possible safety evaluation behavior. Report issuance needs to complete the following tasks:
1. Verification of issues that may affect the credibility of the evaluation organization. Ask and confirm whether the evaluation project may lead to legal disputes; ask and confirm whether there are violations in the evaluation process; determine whether the evaluation project may be various types of risk within the scope of the evaluation agency can afford; whether to sign a confidentiality agreement with the client and accordingly determine the confidentiality of the evaluation report; confirm the number of reports printed; confirm the completeness of archived information.
2, report assessment. Whether the report reflects the overall control level of the evaluation organization, the report is in line with the latest requirements of the supervision and management of production safety, the report text checking is serious, project self-audit, technical audit, process control audit is complete.
3, the legal representative issued the report. After the issuance of the report, the project leader shall submit the report to the archivist for archiving a full set of archived information. Evaluation report printed by the office, binding, inserting photocopies of qualification certificates, stamped with the company seal, sent to the client.
Safety Evaluation Report 3(a) Safety Status Evaluation Report Requirements
The content requirements of the Safety Status Evaluation Report are more detailed and specific than the Safety Pre-evaluation Report, especially for the higher requirements of the hazard analysis, so the entire preparation of the evaluation report should be completed by the participation of the experts who understand the process and operation.
(ii) Safety status evaluation report content
Preface
Including the project unit introduction, evaluation of the project entrusted to the party and the evaluation of the evaluation requirements and evaluation purposes.
Overview of the evaluation project
It should include an overview of the evaluation project, geographic location and natural conditions, process, production and operation of the current situation, the scope of evaluation of the project commissioned by the agreed evaluation, the evaluation of the basis (including regulations, standards, norms and relevant documents of the project).
Evaluation procedures and evaluation methods
Description of the evaluation procedures and evaluation methods selected for the main risks, harmful factors and production characteristics.
Hazardous pre-analysis
Should include process flow, process parameters, control methods, operating conditions, material types and physical and chemical properties, process layout, general location, public works, the use of selected analytical methods for the production of hazardous and harmful factors in the analysis.
Hazard and risk index analysis
According to the results of the analysis of hazardous and harmful factors and determine the evaluation unit, evaluation elements, with reference to the relevant information and data with the selected evaluation method for quantitative analysis.
Accident analysis and major accident simulation
Combined with the results of the field investigation and the peer or similar production of accident case analysis, statistics on the causes and probability of occurrence, the use of the corresponding mathematical model for major accident simulation.
Countermeasures and Recommendations
Synthesize the evaluation results, put forward the corresponding countermeasures and recommendations, and rank the solutions according to the degree of risk.
Evaluation conclusions
Clearly indicate the level of project safety status, and briefly explain.