First of all, it is to put forward the focus of the thesis
Secondly, to explain the historical materials to prove that the thesis has been proved by the relevant points
Thirdly, to put forward your own agreement or a new point of evidence, and cite the evidence
Fourthly, there may also be the existence of problems, and your evidence of the point of refutation of the what
Fifthly, you will be put forward with the argument to refute the point of comparison in order to prove your justification
The above points of feasibility analysis, and then formatting and citation of sources
Feasibility analysis
The above points for the feasibility analysis, and then is the format layout and information references
Feasibility analysis is through the main content of the project and supporting conditions, such as market demand, resource supply, scale of construction, process routes, equipment selection, environmental impacts, financing, profitability, etc., from the technical, economic, engineering and so on, investigation, research and analysis and comparison. Investigation, research and analysis and comparison, and on the project after the completion of the possible financial, economic benefits and social and environmental impact of the forecast, so as to put forward the project whether it is worth investing and how to carry out the construction of the advisory opinion, for the project decision-making basis for a comprehensive systematic analysis method. Feasibility analysis should have the characteristics of predictability, impartiality, reliability and science.
Main content
1, comprehensive and in-depth market analysis and forecasting. Investigate and forecast the supply and demand of the proposed project products in the domestic and international markets and sales prices; study the target market for the product, analyze the market share; research to determine the market, mainly product competitors and their own competitiveness strengths and weaknesses, as well as the product's marketing strategy, and to study and determine the main market risks and the degree of risk.
2, the resource development project should be in-depth study to determine the amount of resources available, the natural quality of resources, the conditions of resources and the value of the development and utilization of resources
3, in-depth design of the project construction program, including: the construction scale of the project and the product program, site selection, process technology and major equipment programs, the main materials and auxiliary materials, the issue of environmental impact, energy saving and water conservation
The feasibility study of the project is from shallow to deep, from coarse to fine, before and after the connection, repeated optimization of a research process. The former stage of the study is for the latter stage of a more precise study of the problem to create conditions. Feasibility study should implement all the business risks, technical risks and profit risks accurately. If a certain aspect is found to be defective after the study, the main reasons for the risks should be found through the revelation of sensitivity parameters, and better alternatives should be found in terms of marketing, products and scales, process technology, raw material routes, equipment programs as well as programs of utility and auxiliary facilities in order to improve the feasibility of the project. If all the options have been repeatedly preferred and the project is still not feasible, the reasons should be stated in the study document. However, it should be made clear that even if the results of the study are infeasible, the study is still valuable as it avoids misuse and waste of funds.
In addition to the above mentioned project feasibility study, we have a closely related to the investment in practice, known as thematic studies, mainly for the feasibility study (or preliminary feasibility study) to create the conditions for the study and to solve some key or specific some of the problems, it is a feasibility study of the prerequisites and aids. Thematic research is categorized as follows:
a. Product market research: market demand and price surveys, analysis and forecasts, the ability of the product to enter the market as well as the expected market penetration, the study of competition, product marketing strategy and competitive countermeasures.
b. Raw materials and input material research: including basic raw materials and inputs of the current and future sources and supply, as well as price trends.
c. Laboratory and intermediate testing of thematic studies: the need for testing and the extent of testing to determine the applicability of certain raw materials or products and their techno-economic indicators.
d. Plant areas and plant site research: combined with the industrial layout, regional economy, internal and external construction conditions, production and supply conditions. Research and selection of areas and sites for plant construction.
e. Economy of scale study: generally as part of the process selection study to be carried out. When the problem is limited to the economy of scale and does not involve a variety of complex processes, the main task of this study is to assess the scale of the plant economy, taking into account the available technology, investment, cost, price, efficiency and market demand, choose the best production scale.
f. Process Selection Study: a variety of possible production technology technology of advanced, applicability, reliability and economy of analysis and evaluation, especially the use of new technologies, new technologies, this research is particularly necessary.
g. Equipment selection ...... >>
Question 2: Whether the conclusions, recommendations or strategies in the thesis are feasible and operational Graduate thesis defense A. Defense process (a) Briefly describe the content of your thesis. In the narrative, you should clearly express your idea (outline), thesis, arguments, and the way of exposition (method). Generally, it takes about 5 minutes. The teacher of the defense will understand your thinking process of the thesis through your narration, and examine your ability of analysis and synthesis. (ii) Impromptu defense. After the defense teacher asks you 2-3 questions, one of the questions is generally directed at the basic concepts and basic principles involved in your dissertation, and examines whether the student's understanding of the cited basic concepts and basic principles is accurate. The second question, which is generally directed at a certain aspect of the arguments involved in your thesis, requires a lecture (discussion) in the context of actual work or professional practice. It examines the connection and help of the professional basic knowledge you have learned to your practical (actual) work, i.e. the ability to link theory with practice. The third question, according to the students have some work experience, puts forward the professional theory or practice in the problem, guides the students to work practice encountered in the case and practice, the discussion of the theoretical basis or the current development of the specialty studied in the many problems and hot issues. Examining the potential ability of students in professional aspects II. Preparation for the defense (a) Students' self-description of the issues that need to be prepared 1. Why did they choose this topic? 2. What is the significance and purpose of studying this topic? (Academic value and practical significance) 3. How is the basic framework and structure of the whole paper organized? 4、How is the logical relationship between the parts of the whole text? 5, explain the history and status of research on this topic, thousands of people have done what research, what results have been achieved, what problems have not been solved, their own in the process of research on this topic, found those different opinions? How do you gradually recognize these different opinions? And how to deal with? 6, although the paper has not been discussed, but its more closely related to the issue of what else? 7, what other issues they have not been clear, in the paper is not thorough enough? 8, the basic point of view of the article and the basis of the argument? 9. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the paper? 10. What are the innovations in the paper? 11. the specific sources of important citations? 12. the feasibility of the insights presented in the paper? 13. the flaws you found when you reread it yourself after the final draft was handed in? 14. what were the lessons learned while writing the thesis? You should think carefully about the above questions, and if necessary, you should organize them with notes and write them into a speech outline to be used in the defense. In this way, you can be prepared and not panic in the battlefield. (B) the defense process, the teacher often asked questions: 1, your thesis used what research methods related to the specialty? 2, what is the core concept in the thesis? Summarize it highly in your own words. 3、What is the reason for you to choose the topic? What kind of practical guidance does the research have? 4、How can the core concepts in the thesis be reflected in your text? 5、Think about it from the opposite point of view: if you don't do what you say, what will be the result? 6、How does the theoretical foundation of the thesis relate to the main framework? What are the most important theoretical foundations? 7、Difference between qualitative research and interview method, qualitative research, quantitative research, survey research, empirical research? 8、After your research, what do you think the results will be? What are the positive or negative effects? 9、What kind of research perspective is the basis of your thesis? Is it a managerial, educational, psychological or sociological perspective? 10. Is your dissertation about an individual or a group? Is it a point study or a surface study? 11. What are the shoulds, realities, and enablements of the study? 12. Are the conclusions, recommendations or strategies in the dissertation feasible and operational? 13. Are the research subjects comparable? Whether the research framework is in line with the specification of the dissertation (rather than the logic of writing a book)! Third, the defense skills (a) self-explanatory and question and answer students should first introduce a summary of the dissertation, which is called the "self-explanatory report", it must be emphasized that the "self-explanatory" rather than "self-reading. It is important to emphasize that it is "self-reporting" and not "self-reading". It is important to emphasize that it is "self-reporting" and not "self-reading". The important skill here is that you must be careful not to turn the report into a "reading" by reading from a book. "Read from the book" is the first major taboo. This part of the content can include writing motives, reasons, research direction, comparison of selected topics, the scope of the study, around the topic of the latest research results, their own new insights in the paper, new understanding or new breakthroughs. Do summarize briefly and concisely. Can not take up too much time, generally limited to ten minutes. The so-called "cut the complexity and redundancy to leave a clear being, drawing to no time is ripe", that is to say, try to achieve the word about the purpose of rich, a word in the right place. To highlight the key points, the biggest gain, the deepest experience, the most essence and the most characteristic part of the expression. Here to pay attention to a taboo theme is not clear; ...... >>
Question 3: how to write the feasibility of the paper Wenma, so the main thesis of the off point, then
one, first of all, is to put forward the focus of the thesis
two, explaining the historical material to prove that the thesis of the off point what has been proved
three, put forward your own agreement or new evidence points, and cite
four, there may also be
The problem is, what are the refuting points
V. Compare and contrast your argument with the refuting ones to prove your validity
The above are the points of feasibility analysis, and then there is the formatting and citation of the information
A. [Basis for Selection of the Topic]
A compendium of the academic history of the relevant studies in China and overseas and their dynamics
The topic is unique to the existing studies
This topic is not a new one.
The unique academic value and application value of this topic relative to existing research.
This part of the writing method is significantly different from the previous year's "review of the current state of research at home and abroad" in the requirements. "Academic history of combing" is closely related to the subject of academic research to do systematic combing, experts recommend that, in accordance with the chronological order of combing, explaining each period of time to pay attention to the content of the research, the formation of the main points of view, to solve which problems, the main academic contribution and the shortcomings, etc.; "research dynamics "refers to the current state of research, that is, the current research of the main academic schools, the main focus on what issues, what views, what problems have been solved, what academic gaps exist, what issues need to be further deepened research, etc.;" "the unique academic value of this topic relative to the existing research and the application of value "On the basis of the above sorting, explain what theoretical and practical problems your research is intended to solve, what aspects of your research can fill the gaps, or in what aspects of the existing research to play a complementary and corrective role, and then explain your research "relative to the unique academic value of existing research and application value "The amount of text in this section will take up a certain amount of space. This part of the amount of text should take up more space, not too simple, to be carefully sorted out.
Second, [the content of the study]
The subject of the research object, the overall framework, the focus of the difficulties, the main objectives.
"The object of research on this topic", not only to explain what you want to study, but also to explain the importance of this issue, the importance of the two main aspects of the meaning: one is the main theoretical, the second is the practice or application of the importance of. Focus on that aspect of the specific look at your research focus on that aspect, do not write that is of great theoretical significance and significant practical (applied) significance, unlimited exaltation will affect the credibility. Enough to let the reviewer that there is indeed a need for research. This part should be written in more detail, the argument is sufficient, can not be too simple, otherwise it is difficult to be persuasive.
"General framework" should have the basic structure of the study, but also to write the "flesh and blood", not just a title. The basic framework should be interlocked, logical, content should also have the top and bottom of the undertaking. The formation of a rigorous structure, content-rich research overall framework. This part of the writing and the past, "the main study" is very similar, but more on the problem of awareness of the content of the investigation, is the core part of the argumentative material weighted the highest.
Third, [ideas and methods]
The basic idea of the subject research, specific research methods, research programs and their feasibility.
Among them, special attention should be paid to the specific research methods, not only to explain the use of research methods, but also to explain in the study of which specific issues when using these methods. Do not write about methods that are not relevant to this study, or the jury will consider you to have problems with research methodology.
Fourth, please pay attention to the format, be sure to follow the requirements, please double-check.
The content of the declaration material is fixed and can not be changed at will. Generally speaking, do not fill in the format requirements, the review experts will be considered not serious. The evaluation results will have a great impact!
I hope to help you, satisfied with the hope adopted Oh.
Question 4: How to write the feasibility of the paper I am studying engineering, our feasibility analysis is to analyze the environmental feasibility of the technology, economic feasibility, policy feasibility, technical feasibility, in order to determine the feasibility or infeasibility of the program. And make a summary.
Question 5: How to write a feasibility analysis of the dissertation opening report How to write a dissertation opening report
First, how to choose the problem
What haunts me together is that in the more than a year of writing the dissertation opening report, the tutor repeatedly asked
A question: "What is your puzzle? " How many times I answered without thinking, "My question is why China's
semiconductor industry can't develop." The teacher question with its characteristic savings, laugh and not answer. I was both annoyed
fire and chagrin in my mind: such a simple reason, such an obvious answer, where in the end is wrong?
The mystery lies in the "level" of the question. Unlike policy research reports, academic articles gather theoretical dimensions and solve
theoretical problems. Theory is a logical system constructed from a series of presuppositions and terms. Theories in a particular field have their own specific concepts,
concepts, categories and research paradigms. Only with the same concepts, perspectives, and paradigms can theories be dialogued, and only through dialog can theories evolve. Very few master's and doctoral dissertations create new theories, and it would be nice to do so, but it is very difficult.
Most of us build on existing theories, and therefore formulate our questions in terms that "insiders" understand
and with clear logic. Looking at my original question, "Why is China's semiconductor industry failing to develop"
, this is merely an inquiry into the phenomenon, not a theoretical proposition to be proven. My theoretical proposition is: "China's industrial policy
process is elite-led **** knowledge process?" In this proposition, the terms "policy process", "elite politics", and "*** knowledge
demands" outline the broad theoretical scope and perspective of the study.
Second, the selection of issues is a process of "peeling off the shoots". Theoretical issues are always y hidden behind the complex reality
, and the discovery of theoretical issues requires the ability to use theoretical thinking. The training of theoretical thinking is a long-term accumulation
process. However, beginners do not have to be deterred, can be roughly divided into "three steps": the first step, first delineate a "range of interest
, such as the semiconductor industry, the information industry, rural health care, higher education system, etc., and widely browse through the relevant media
The first step is to define a "scope of interest", such as the semiconductor industry, information industry, rural healthcare, higher education system, etc., and browse the relevant media reports, *** literature and academic articles to find the "crux" or "hot spot". The second step is to summarize the theoretical perspectives from which previous researchers
have analyzed the issues and the theoretical tools they have used, such as the public finance
perspective and the social conflict paradigm. The third step is to examine the researchability of the problem, that is, our own research space and the feasibility of research.
For example, whether Western theories are unable to explain the problem? For example, are Western theories unable to explain Chinese problems? Or can the same problem be explained by different
theories? Or are there flaws in the assumptions and logical derivations of the theories themselves?
By answering these questions, we find the basis for our research. But it is also important to note whether our research is likely to be completed within the allotted one to two years.
Is it feasible to obtain the data? Is it feasible to obtain the data? And so on.
Finally, how do you state the problem? The problem statement is essentially the process of crystallizing the core ideas. The idea should come from thinking and summarizing the actual problem, not from "cutting the feet to fit the shoes" in order to set up a theory. China's political, economic, and social development
is a dynamic and rich landscape, so how can it be expressed in appropriate terms and precise logic? Ambitious
Beginners often put forward ambitious concepts or frameworks, but my advice is to narrow the scope of the study as much as possible, clear research objects,
so as to clarify the object of the memory of the logic, to ensure that in the limited time to complete the specification of the academic
academic papers. Such as "China's semiconductor industry policy research" is a very ambiguous statement, we can from several aspects
to contract the topic: (1) time: from 1980 to 2000; (2) the object: *** insurgents and decision-making
behavior, rather than the market, business, governance structure, etc.; (3) the perspective: *** insurgents and decision-making
behavior, not the market, business, governance structure, etc.; (3) the perspective: *** insurgents, business, governance structure, etc. etc.; (3) Perspective: elite studies in politics and *** theory; (
4) Cases: Project 908, Project 909, Document 13, and Electronic Revitalization, two major projects and two important documents in the field of semiconductor policy that took place between 1980 and
2000. With such a clear definition, we can focus
on the obvious concepts of "policy process", "elites", and "*** knowledge", and the problem will be solved.
The problem is now clear. At the same time, the problem is clear, we have a clear standard in the screening of information and data, in this "information
redundancy" era, can greatly improve the efficiency of research.
Second, how to do a literature review
First of all, you need to "Literature Review" and "Background Description (......)". >>
Question 6: How to write a feasibility analysis of the introduction part of the dissertation The introduction is a chapter before the main body "chapter". The writing of the introduction should include a research review, the scope of the research and the research point of view of their own thesis. 1. research synthesis Writing a thesis must have a research synthesis, also called a synthesis report. Research synthesis is to sort out the history, current situation, development trend of the research object of this thesis, and to evaluate these studies. It identifies the logical starting point for your own research and builds on the exploration you will be doing based on the research of others. In the dissertations I reviewed, the problems of research synthesis are mainly manifested in the fact that it is too brief and lacks analysis and evaluation. Some of them just list the treatises of other people's research without any analysis, replacing their own review with a list of articles. In some cases, the research review takes up half of the whole paper, replacing the exposition of one's own point of view with the review. 2. Research point of view In addition to writing a research synthesis, the preface should also state your own research point of view, what issues you will discuss in this thesis, and what points of view you put forward. Define the key words that relate to the point of view of the thesis, to what extent one is discussing the issue and how one is using the point of view. Doing this makes one's ideas clear and focused so that others can see them. It also avoids ambiguity about the scope of the discussion and keywords. The preface should be clear and understandable, and it is best to have chapter headings as well. 3. General description of the research content The analytical method of the dissertation generally follows two procedures, one is the logical-analytical procedure: "analyze-synthesize", and the other is the systematic-synthesized procedure: "synthesize-analyze-synthesize". -analysis-synthesis". I think it is best to adopt a systematic and comprehensive procedure, with a high level, the role of the outline. Comprehensive procedure of the first "synthesis" is the preface, the object of study as a synthesis, the overall description of their own views. The "analysis" is based on the synthesis, the various parts of the chapter according to the sub-point of view of the discussion, each analysis of the results of the feedback to the previous level of synthesis. The latter "synthesis" is the concluding part of the dissertation, which summarizes the entire study and outlines one's own dissertation ideas. Therefore, the introduction presents the viewpoints of one's own research, and it is necessary to further elaborate one's own research as a whole, that is to say, to make a systematic general description of one's own thesis. This overall description is equivalent to the abstract of the paper. Convenient for readers to grasp at a glance the thesis of their own thesis and the content of the thesis. Also for the following into the first chapter of the discussion to prepare. Perhaps some students will say, I have already talked about their own research in the abstract, do not need to talk about the content of the thesis in the preamble. The two are different; the introduction belongs to the body of the dissertation, in which you should give a comprehensive description of your research. The reader may not read your abstract, but read your body. If you don't give a general description of your research in the preface, you miss an opportunity to give the reader a general picture of your dissertation and increase the difficulty of understanding your dissertation ideas. You leave the reader confused and unable to find out what your point is half the time. If the reader can't understand it, he or she may be reluctant or impatient to read it.
Question 7: How to write the feasibility analysis of the dissertation in the opening report Feasibility analysis should be, by what methodological means you will complete your research, so the content should have the research methodology and steps
Question 8: It is time to defend the dissertation, I do not know the basic points of the dissertation and the feasibility of presenting the insights to be answered what? 20 points You know how to write a busy Teach me
Question 9: from the institutional aspects of the feasibility of the thesis arguments of judges and lawyers? Judges and lawyers There are, to bang help?