After understanding this point, you should understand that the state used to assist the disaster area of all the supplies (water, food, tents, medical facilities, etc.) are basically from the community to buy the enterprise. In addition to corporate donations, the rest of the supplies are purchased in cash. Most of the money donated to the disaster area was used to purchase these facilities.
As for post-disaster reconstruction, basically speaking, donations are not enough. The state has already allocated money from its budget. But by the same token, building materials, labor costs, etc. needed for reconstruction also need to be purchased.
The owner of the building thinks that it is all in one country, how can it still use money. The reason for this is that the materials used for aid do not belong to the state, but to individuals, and the state does not have the right to force them to be used without compensation.
Now more than $100 million in donations from all over the world, if you have to analyze from an economic point of view, then the first is that with this $100 million, the country can be less than $100 million, which is the same as a certain degree of reduction in the issuance of currency, to avoid inflation (but in fact, $100 million of the impact on inflation is extremely small)
The second is that the country because of the donations can be less expenditure of part of the funds, can be better The second is that the country will have less money to spend because of the donation, which can be better utilized in other areas.
Regarding what was said upstairs, there are some mistakes. This time, the disaster area does not accept used clothes, only new ones. This, about fundraising, actually it is not an economic behavior, so it is difficult to explain by economic principles.
Corporate fundraising is, to a certain extent, an advertising behavior for our company. But I hope people don't see it as an advertisement, but as an expression of love.
The implications. I have written about it earlier.