After as many as four coordination of the relevant departments, the community property and developers of the dispute is still not properly resolved, and now the two sides have entered the litigation process, the next step in the progress of the two sides need to be lawyers, including professionals, in accordance with the relevant legal process to clarify the responsibility for the responsibility of the responsibility for the lack of clear delineation of the previous, I'm afraid it is impossible to short time To solve this dispute, but also fully illustrates our current property management and real estate development field there is still a short board, the lack of professionalism, but also led to the emergence of similar cases of the layer is not strong.
It is well known that disputes between property companies and owners of the community are relatively common, but there are few conflicts between property companies and developers, which has a lot to do with the chaotic and unorganized development of the industry over the years. Usually, the property companies in the community are all under the developer's umbrella or a cooperative enterprise, and therefore cooperate with each other in the interests of the relevant situation, but as more and more neighborhoods begin to pay attention to the role of the property committee, the property company is composed of the developer or a cooperative enterprise. But as more and more neighborhoods began to focus on the role of the committee, the property company by the open business appointed or decided to further improve the chaos of the industry, the dispute in Qionghai is very persuasive.
In fact, property companies and owners and developers are closely linked to the interests of the **** the same body, the developer to complete the development of the property and the owners to move in after the relevant services and management will be undertaken by the property company, especially the income and expenditure of water and electricity, the property company needs to formulate a meticulous plan to avoid large errors, but the real estate developer of the district, and will not be the water and electricity related facilities and equipment transferred to the property company, coupled with the fact that the property company will not be the property company. However, the real estate developer of the district, did not transfer the water and electricity related facilities to the property company, coupled with a large common area in the district, which led to a large difference between the fees collected and paid, which is the fundamental reason for the dispute between the two sides.
Undoubtedly, the property company and the developer for whatever reason, the owners of the district as a disadvantaged party will be affected, especially the problem of water and electricity, once unable to solve the problem of water and electricity at every turn to take the extreme means and measures, which also greatly affects the normal life of the owners of the district, so that regardless of the dispute between the two parties to deal with the follow-up of how to evolve, it is not to let the owners to bear the costs and costs. The cost and price of the dispute is not to be borne by the owners.